<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/">
  <channel>
    <title>JAMA: War Topic Collection</title>
    <link>http://jama.jamanetwork.com/</link>
    <description>
    </description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 22:46:50 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>Silverchair</generator>
    <managingEditor>editor@jama.jamanetwork.com</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>webmaster@jama.jamanetwork.com</webMaster>
    <item>
      <title>Combat Casualty Care Research</title>
      <link>http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleID=1677347</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Mitka M. </author>
      <description>&lt;span class="paragraphSection"&gt;The Department of Defense (DoD) estimates that almost 25% of service members who die in combat could have survived if better and faster medical care had been available. But a report from the Government Accountability Office (GAO), released February 13, found that communication among the elements of the DoD charged with conducting research and development on biomedical casualty care was so poor that the department cannot be sure the research it is conducting is producing results that save lives on the battlefield (http://tinyurl.com/aqzoxqv).&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <prism:volume xmlns:prism="prism">309</prism:volume>
      <prism:number xmlns:prism="prism">14</prism:number>
      <prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="prism">1452</prism:startingPage>
      <prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="prism">1452</prism:endingPage>
      <prism:doi xmlns:prism="prism">10.1001/jama.2013.3559</prism:doi>
      <guid>http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleID=1677347</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>