<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/">
  <channel>
    <title>JAMA: Ophthalmology Topic Collection</title>
    <link>http://jama.jamanetwork.com/</link>
    <description>
    </description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 20:45:26 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>Silverchair</generator>
    <managingEditor>editor@jama.jamanetwork.com</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>webmaster@jama.jamanetwork.com</webMaster>
    <item>
      <title>Lutein + Zeaxanthin and Omega-3 Fatty Acids for Age-Related Macular Degeneration The Age-Related Eye Disease Study 2 (AREDS2) Randomized Clinical Trial   Supplements and Age-Related Macular Degeneration </title>
      <link>http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleID=1684847</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author> . </author>
      <description>&lt;span class="paragraphSection"&gt;&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Importance&lt;/div&gt;Oral supplementation with the Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) formulation (antioxidant vitamins C and E, beta carotene, and zinc) has been shown to reduce the risk of progression to advanced age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Observational data suggest that increased dietary intake of lutein + zeaxanthin (carotenoids), omega-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (docosahexaenoic acid [DHA] + eicosapentaenoic acid [EPA]), or both might further reduce this risk.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Objectives&lt;/div&gt;To determine whether adding lutein + zeaxanthin, DHA + EPA, or both to the AREDS formulation decreases the risk of developing advanced AMD and to evaluate the effect of eliminating beta carotene, lowering zinc doses, or both in the AREDS formulation.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Design, Setting, and Participants&lt;/div&gt;The Age-Related Eye Disease Study 2 (AREDS2), a multicenter, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled phase 3 study with a 2 × 2 factorial design, conducted in 2006-2012 and enrolling 4203 participants aged 50 to 85 years at risk for progression to advanced AMD with bilateral large drusen or large drusen in 1 eye and advanced AMD in the fellow eye.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Interventions&lt;/div&gt;Participants were randomized to receive lutein (10 mg) + zeaxanthin (2 mg), DHA (350 mg) + EPA (650 mg), lutein + zeaxanthin and DHA + EPA, or placebo. All participants were also asked to take the original AREDS formulation or accept a secondary randomization to 4 variations of the AREDS formulation, including elimination of beta carotene, lowering of zinc dose, or both.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Main Outcomes and Measures&lt;/div&gt;Development of advanced AMD. The unit of analyses used was by eye.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Results&lt;/div&gt;Median follow-up was 5 years, with 1940 study eyes (1608 participants) progressing to advanced AMD. Kaplan-Meier probabilities of progression to advanced AMD by 5 years were 31% (493 eyes [406 participants]) for placebo, 29% (468 eyes [399 participants]) for lutein + zeaxanthin, 31% (507 eyes [416 participants]) for DHA + EPA, and 30% (472 eyes [387 participants]) for lutein + zeaxanthin and DHA + EPA. Comparison with placebo in the primary analyses demonstrated no statistically significant reduction in progression to advanced AMD (hazard ratio [HR], 0.90 [98.7% CI, 0.76-1.07]; P = .12 for lutein + zeaxanthin; 0.97 [98.7% CI, 0.82-1.16]; P = .70 for DHA + EPA; 0.89 [98.7% CI, 0.75-1.06]; P = .10 for lutein + zeaxanthin and DHA + EPA). There was no apparent effect of beta carotene elimination or lower-dose zinc on progression to advanced AMD. More lung cancers were noted in the beta carotene vs no beta carotene group (23 [2.0%] vs 11 [0.9%], nominal P = .04), mostly in former smokers.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Conclusions and Relevance&lt;/div&gt;Addition of lutein + zeaxanthin, DHA + EPA, or both to the AREDS formulation in primary analyses did not further reduce risk of progression to advanced AMD. However, because of potential increased incidence of lung cancer in former smokers, lutein + zeaxanthin could be an appropriate carotenoid substitute in the AREDS formulation.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Trial Registration&lt;/div&gt;clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00345176&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <prism:volume xmlns:prism="prism">309</prism:volume>
      <prism:number xmlns:prism="prism">19</prism:number>
      <prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="prism">2005</prism:startingPage>
      <prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="prism">2015</prism:endingPage>
      <prism:doi xmlns:prism="prism">10.1001/jama.2013.4997</prism:doi>
      <guid>http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleID=1684847</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Do Findings on Routine Examination Identify Patients at Risk for Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma? The Rational Clinical Examination Systematic Review  Patients at Risk for Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma </title>
      <link>http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleID=1687583</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Hollands H, Johnson D, Hollands S, et al. </author>
      <description>&lt;span class="paragraphSection"&gt;&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Importance&lt;/div&gt;Glaucoma is the second leading cause of blindness worldwide, and its insidious onset is often associated with diagnostic delay. Since glaucoma progression can often be effectively diminished when treated, identifying individuals at risk for glaucoma could potentially lead to earlier detection and prevent associated vision loss.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Objective&lt;/div&gt;To quantify the diagnostic accuracy of examination findings and relevant risk factors in identifying individuals with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), the most common form of glaucoma in North America.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Data Sources&lt;/div&gt;Structured Medline (January 1950-January 2013) search and a hand search of references and citations of retrieved articles yielding 57 articles from 41 studies.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Study Selection&lt;/div&gt;Population-based studies of high-level methods relating relevant examination findings of cup-to-disc ratio (CDR), CDR asymmetry, intraocular pressure (IOP), and demographic risk factors to the presence of POAG.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Results&lt;/div&gt;The summary prevalence of glaucoma in the highest-quality studies was 2.6% (95% CI, 2.1%-3.1%). Among risk factors evaluated, high myopia (≥6 diopters; odds ratio [OR], 5.7; 95% CI, 3.1-11) and family history (OR, 3.3; 95% CI, 2.0-5.6) had the strongest association with glaucoma. Black race (OR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.4-5.9) and increasing age (especially age &gt;80 years; OR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.9-4.3) were also associated with an increased risk. As CDR increased, the likelihood for POAG increased with a likelihood ratio (LR) of 14 (95% CI, 5.3-39) for CDR of 0.7 or greater. Increasing CDR asymmetry was also associated with an increased likelihood for POAG (CDR asymmetry ≥0.3; LR, 7.3; 95% CI, 3.3-16). No single threshold for CDR or asymmetry ruled out glaucoma. The presence of a disc hemorrhage (LR, 12; 95% CI, 2.9-48) was highly suggestive of glaucoma, but the absence of a hemorrhage was nondiagnostic (LR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.83-0.98). At the commonly used cutoff for high IOP (≥22), the LR was 13 (95% CI, 8.2-17), while lower IOP made glaucoma less likely (LR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.55-0.76). We found no studies of screening examinations performed by generalist physicians in a routine setting.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Conclusions and Relevance&lt;/div&gt;Individual findings of increased CDR, CDR asymmetry, disc hemorrhage, and elevated IOP, as well as demographic risk factors of family history, black race, and advanced age are associated with increased risk for POAG, but their absence does not effectively rule out POAG. The best available data support examination by an ophthalmologist as the most accurate way to detect glaucoma.&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <prism:volume xmlns:prism="prism">309</prism:volume>
      <prism:number xmlns:prism="prism">19</prism:number>
      <prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="prism">2035</prism:startingPage>
      <prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="prism">2042</prism:endingPage>
      <prism:doi xmlns:prism="prism">10.1001/jama.2013.5099</prism:doi>
      <guid>http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleID=1687583</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>