TY  - JOUR
T1  - PRemarital hiv screening-reply
AU  - Belongia EA, Vergeront JM, Davis JP
Y1  - 1989/04/21
N1  - 10.1001/jama.1989.03420150048017
JO  - JAMA
SP  - 2198
EP  - 2198
VL  - 261
IS  - 15
N2  - In Reply. — 
    We agree with Dr Mercola that the cost of identifying a person with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection is currently lower than our original estimate, although variations in the cost of testing limit the accuracy of this analysis. Dr Mercola, however, fails to recognize that a reduction of the cost estimate does not alter the main point of our letter: that premarital screening for HIV infection does not represent rational or effective public health policy. The goal of any screening program should be the prevention of additional illness. There is no evidence that this goal has been accomplished in Illinois. The prevalence of HIV infection is extremely low among marriage license applicants and the number of cases prevented is likely to be much lower than the number of cases identified. During 1988, twenty-six (0.017%) of 155 458 Illinois marriage license applicants were seropositive, but it is not
SN  - 0098-7484
M3  - doi: 10.1001/jama.1989.03420150048017
UR  - http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.1989.03420150048017
ER  -