RT Journal
T1 Numerical error in associated review article in: Circumcision and hiv prevention among men who have sex with men: no final word
JF JAMA
JO JAMA
YR 2009
FD March 18
VO 301
IS 11
SP 1129
OP 1129
DO 10.1001/jama.281.12.1086
UL http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.281.12.1086
AB 
Numerical Error in Associated Review Article:  In the Editorial entitled “Circumcision and HIV Prevention Among Men Who Have Sex With Men: No Final Word” published in the October 8, 2008, issue of JAMA (2008;300[14]: 1698-1700), a numerical error was published. On page 1698, in sentence 5 of paragraph 4, the odds ratio should have read “0.95 (95% confidence interval, 0.81-1.11).” This incorrect odds ratio occurred because of an error in the spreadsheet computations of the random-effects variance estimate in the associated Review article entitled “Circumcision Status and Risk of HIV and Sexually Transmitted Infections Among Men Who Have Sex With Men: A Meta-analysis.”