Author Affiliations: Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center (gilkey@email.unc.edu); and Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (Dr Brewer).
To the Editor: Mr Gostin's Commentary questioned whether mandates for human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination are effective enough to risk alienating the public.1 Data in studies he cites address this matter. In the 2 places that have adopted mandates, Virginia and the District of Columbia, coverage remains modest. Compared with 49% of female adolescents nationwide, just 54% of those in Virginia and 58% of those in the District of Columbia had received 1 or more doses of HPV vaccine by 2010 according to medical records.2 Existing mandates include generous opt-out provisions that, in the case of the District of Columbia, more than 40% of parents used to circumvent the policy.
Gostin suggested widespread educational campaigns and mandates without generous opt-outs as a last resort, but we think this focus on the public is likely misguided. Numerous surveys indicate that many people already agree with HPV vaccination mandates. Most recently, studies found that 47% to 59% of parents agreed with mandates that did not specify an opt-out provision.3 - 4 When opt-out provisions were included, agreement increased dramatically to 84% to 92%.3 - 4 Thus, the very thing that undermines the effectiveness of mandates, an opt-out clause, is what makes them palatable. Weakly effective interventions like education are neither likely to resolve this paradox nor substantially increase vaccine uptake.
By contrast, interventions that address the factors of health care systems such as cost and clinician recommendation show considerable promise. For example, voluntary provision of no-cost HPV vaccine is a strategy that 3 states, including South Dakota and Washington, currently use. With 69% of adolescent girls having received at least 1 dose, these 2 states have attained among the highest HPV vaccine initiation rates in the nation.2 Evidence from abroad indicates that combining universal coverage with a school-based approach may be particularly effective; a voluntary, no-cost, school-based program in England, for example, has achieved vaccine initiation levels as high as 90%.5 Because the Affordable Care Act will provide nearly universal coverage for vaccination costs, such an approach may be increasingly feasible in the United States.
Gostin concluded, “Above all, health policy must be driven by science.”1 Although we are far from having conclusive evidence, an emergent literature indicates that cost and access are more important barriers to HPV vaccination than public opinion. Further study of voluntary, no-cost programs in schools to improve HPV vaccine uptake among adolescents in the United States is warranted.
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Both authors have completed and submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Dr Gilkey reported being funded by a grant from the National Cancer Institute to the University of North Carolina. Dr Brewer reported receiving grants from GlaxoSmithKline and Merck and serving on the advisory board for the HPV vaccine for Merck.
Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature
Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal
Instructions
Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of the Journal of American Medical Association editors. Comments should not exceed 500 words of text and 10 references.
Do not submit personal medical questions or information that could identify a specific patient, questions about a particular case, or general inquiries to an author. Only content that has not been published, posted, or submitted elsewhere should be submitted. By submitting this Comment, you and any coauthors transfer copyright to the journal if your Comment is posted.
* = Required Field
Disclosure of Any Conflicts of Interest* Indicate all relevant conflicts of interest of each author below, including all relevant financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including, but not limited to, employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speakers’ bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued. If all authors have none, check "No potential conflicts or relevant financial interests" in the box below. Please also indicate any funding received in support of this work. The information will be posted with your response.
Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more
Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features
Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)
Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.
Download citation file:
Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.
and access these and other features:
Register Now
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.
Athens and Shibboleth are access management services that provide single sign-on to protected resources. They replace the multiple user names and passwords necessary to access subscription-based content with a single user name and password that can be entered once per session. It operates independently of a user's location or IP address. If your institution uses Athens or Shibboleth authentication, please contact your site administrator to receive your user name and password.