0
Letters |

Buprenorphine Implants and Opioid Dependence

Darius A. Rastegar, MD
JAMA. 2011;305(3):253-255. doi:10.1001/jama.2010.1988
Text Size: A A A
Published online

To the Editor: Dr Ling and colleagues1 provided evidence of the effectiveness of buprenorphine implants for the treatment of opioid dependence. However, as Dr O’Connor2 pointed out in his accompanying Editorial, there are barriers to this approach, and it remains to be seen whether this is more effective than the current practice of prescribing sublingual buprenorphine in an office-based setting.

In their discussion, the study authors made a case for the superiority of implants over the current approach by selectively comparing their 6-month treatment retention of 65.7% with 3 other studies with rates ranging from 33% to 38%. However, none of these studies assessed office-based treatment. One (reference 21 in the article) provided a modest maximum dose of 8 mg per day of buprenorphine; another (reference 22) was a 16-week trial followed by a 10-week taper-off treatment; and the third (reference 20) was a study of a stepped-care approach that reported a 6-month treatment retention of 77%, but approximately half of those assigned to buprenorphine switched to methadone maintenance.

In contrast, there are published studies of office-based sublingual buprenorphine treatment that report much better treatment retention rates. In the open-label phase of the landmark study by Fudala et al,3 55% of the participants received at least 6 months of treatment. In an analysis of office-based buprenorphine treatment at the Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, 57% of patients remained in treatment at 12 months.4

AUTHOR INFORMATION

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: The author has completed and submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest and none were reported.

REFERENCES

Ling W, Casadonte P, Bigelow G,  et al.  Buprenorphine implants for treatment of opioid dependence: a randomized controlled trial.  JAMA. 2010;304(14):1576-1583
PubMedCrossRef
O’Connor PG. Advances in the treatment of opioid dependence: continued progress and ongoing challenges.  JAMA. 2010;304(14):1612-1614
PubMedCrossRef
Fudala PJ, Bridge TP, Herbert S,  et al; Buprenorphine/Naloxone Collaborative Study Group.  Office-based treatment of opiate addiction with a sublingual-tablet formulation of buprenorphine and naloxone.  N Engl J Med. 2003;349(10):949-958
PubMedCrossRef
Soeffing JM, Martin LD, Fingerhood MI, Jasinski DR, Rastegar DA. Buprenorphine maintenance treatment in a primary care setting: outcomes at 1 year.  J Subst Abuse Treat. 2009;37(4):426-430
PubMedCrossRef

First Page Preview

First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

Ling W, Casadonte P, Bigelow G,  et al.  Buprenorphine implants for treatment of opioid dependence: a randomized controlled trial.  JAMA. 2010;304(14):1576-1583
PubMedCrossRef
O’Connor PG. Advances in the treatment of opioid dependence: continued progress and ongoing challenges.  JAMA. 2010;304(14):1612-1614
PubMedCrossRef
Fudala PJ, Bridge TP, Herbert S,  et al; Buprenorphine/Naloxone Collaborative Study Group.  Office-based treatment of opiate addiction with a sublingual-tablet formulation of buprenorphine and naloxone.  N Engl J Med. 2003;349(10):949-958
PubMedCrossRef
Soeffing JM, Martin LD, Fingerhood MI, Jasinski DR, Rastegar DA. Buprenorphine maintenance treatment in a primary care setting: outcomes at 1 year.  J Subst Abuse Treat. 2009;37(4):426-430
PubMedCrossRef
January 19, 2011
Debasish Basu, MD; Vineet Kumar, MD
JAMA. 2011;305(3):253-255. doi:10.1001/jama.2010.1989.
January 19, 2011
Patrick G. O’Connor, MD, MPH
JAMA. 2011;305(3):253-255. doi:10.1001/jama.2010.1991.
January 19, 2011
Walter Ling, MD; Richard N. Rosenthal, MD; Katherine L. Beebe, PhD
JAMA. 2011;305(3):253-255. doi:10.1001/jama.2010.1990.
CME Course for:


You need to register in order to view this quiz.


To understand the clinical management of acute heart failure syndromes.
Accreditation Information The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
To view and print your certificate and access a summary of your CME courses go to My CME.
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s “Cited By” API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Response

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.