0
Book and Media Reviews |

The Practice of Radiology Education: Challenges and Trends

Helen Anne D'Alessandro, MD
JAMA. 2010;304(11):1242-1243. doi:10.1001/jama.2010.1353
Text Size: A A A
Published online

AUTHOR INFORMATION

Edited by Teresa Van Deven, Kathryn M. Hibbert, and Rethy K. Chhem
264 pp, $129
New York, NY, Springer, 2009
ISBN-13: 978-3-6420-3147-2

“Teaching is not a lost art, but the regard for it has become a lost tradition.” This quote in The Practice of Radiology Education: Challenges and Trends expresses the book's underlying concern: that the reciprocal partnership between radiology teaching and education is vital and yet often neglected in academic radiology.

The Practice of Radiology Education —second in a series on radiology education—serves as a reference guide for readers interested in improving radiology teaching programs and resident education. Based primarily on the experiences of educators in the Department of Medical Imaging at the University of Western Ontario, Canada, the book presents an international perspective on how to best implement postgraduate training programs and improve radiology education. Although radiologists are the target audience, the book contains universal themes and recommendations for postgraduate physician education in any medical specialty. The authors' main goal is to emphasize the symbiotic relationship between teaching and education and to demonstrate its effective incorporation into residency training programs, both in theory and in practice.

The book is divided into 3 main sections. The first section, “Curriculum,” outlines the journey many radiologists take as educators, describing the important partnership between radiology teaching and resident education. Radiology learning is an active, ongoing, integrative process that combines “three basic skills: perception, interpretation and diagnosis.” The book provides effective ways to develop these skills and design a core curriculum for residents and fellows. The main examples provided are the CanMeds and Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education radiology residency programs in Canada and the United States, respectively. The “three basic core approaches” to resident training—rotations, case-based learning, and academic time—are discussed in depth. The authors stress the need for a participatory and dynamic learning environment with an “integrated curriculum” in medical imaging (self-directed study, online learning, and teaching modules) to better suit the needs of a rapidly changing specialty, especially with the implementation of new technology including digital imaging.

The second section, “Programs and Trainees,” offers an international perspective on how to redesign and effectively implement radiology education programs. The national training programs in Australia/New Zealand and Thailand are showcased as examples of a more effective way to train and deploy radiologists. Daily resident case review is the most important component of a radiology training program, its effectiveness depending on the quantity and variety of teaching interactions and available cases. However, some of the chapters in this section, including the training of musculoskeletal ultrasound specialists and medical physics in radiology imaging, seem misplaced and not specifically related to radiology education and the ethos of the book.

The third section, “Leadership and Resources,” effectively details how radiologists can overcome the inherent obstacles involved in restructuring an academic program and how to use their available resources to improve both clinical and academic productivity. It offers a firsthand account of how a new department chairman rejuvenated a program and serves as a primer for those interested in leadership positions in radiology. The importance of fostering translational research is likewise discussed, emphasizing “residents who transition from practitioners to researchers are more likely to become successful academic leaders.” It additionally stresses the importance of research mentors, transdisciplinary learning, and annual research forums.

The importance of having a standardized structure and documentation process in a teaching program—from resident selection to staff evaluations to research projects—is heavily emphasized. Differentiated instruction is championed, recognizing that new medical school graduates often present to residencies with different “funds of knowledge.” The chapter covering this topic offers an interesting perspective, explaining that difference should not be equated with deficiency and shows how residents can use differentiated instruction to create a more individualized learning program. The book also questions, but does not effectively answer, how more universal terminology might be created to organize and communicate radiological information more efficiently and effectively.

The Practice of Radiology Education: Challenges and Trends is a valuable reference to help design, develop, and implement more effective training programs. Radiologists are not only clinicians but valued consultants, helping referring physicians as well as patients. The book is most compelling when emphasizing the important relationship between teaching and education—vital in all medical specialties—which ultimately leads to improved patient care.

Financial Disclosures: None reported.

First Page Preview

First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

CME Course for:


You need to register in order to view this quiz.


To understand the clinical management of acute heart failure syndromes.
Accreditation Information The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
To view and print your certificate and access a summary of your CME courses go to My CME.
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s “Cited By” API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Response

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.