0
Editorial |

Lactoferrin Supplementation to Prevent Nosocomial Infections in Preterm Infants

David A. Kaufman, MD
[+] Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville.


JAMA. 2009;302(13):1467-1468. doi:10.1001/jama.2009.1449
Text Size: A A A
Published online

The study by Manzoni and colleagues1 in this issue of JAMA represents an important step toward preventing infections that currently pose a major hurdle for preterm infants. The findings give insight into the role of lactoferrin in preventing infection, helping to define its importance in breast milk as well as the effect of daily supplementation with bovine lactoferrin (BLF) in preterm infants.

The incidence of late-onset (>72 hours of age) bloodstream infections in very low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants (<1500 g) is approximately 20% and is complicated by high mortality and neurodevelopmental impairment.2 - 3 In the United States, nearly 65 000 VLBW infants are born each year, which translates into approximately 13 000 infections, 2300 deaths, and neurodevelopmental impairment in 3000 survivors.4 For the smallest infants of extremely low birth weight (ELBW) (<1000 g), neurodevelopmental impairment occurs in 45% of those who survive bacteremia and 57% of those who survive fungemia.3 For VLBW infants, bloodstream infections increase hospital treatment costs and length of stay.5

Manzoni and colleagues1 performed a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial in VLBW infants comparing administration of BLF alone or in combination with Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) to placebo. Invasive infections (blood or cerebrospinal or peritoneal fluid) were significantly lower in the treatment groups (5.9% for BLF and 4.6% for BLF plus LGG, vs 17% for placebo). This effect was strongest for infants weighing less than 1000 g (11.3% for BLF and 11.1% for BLF plus LGG, vs 36.7% for placebo). There was an effect on infection-related mortality for both treatment groups (0% for BLF and 0.7% for BLF plus LGG, vs 4.8% for placebo), whereas the incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis was decreased in the BLF plus LGG group only (0% vs 6% in infants receiving placebo).

The effect of BLF and BLF plus LGG was significant for ELBW infants (n = 167), as well as those weighing less than 750 g (n = 39) and of 27 weeks or fewer gestation (n = 118), but not for infants weighing between 1000 and 1500 g (n = 307). This may be explained in part by the dosing used in the study. The infants did not receive dosing based on their weight, but rather all infants received 100 mg per day; therefore, smaller infants received a higher dose per kilogram per day. For example, for infants weighing 500, 1000, and 1500 g, the dose per kg would be 200, 100, and 67 mg/kg, respectively. Extremely low-birth-weight infants also received study drug for 6 weeks compared with only 4 weeks for infants weighing 1000 to 1500 g. Thus, supplementation of BLF between 100 and 200 mg/kg per day and possibly for a longer period may be needed for all patients. Additionally, doses higher than 200 mg/kg per day may have a greater effect and need to be further studied.

Post hoc analysis revealed that BLF decreased gram-positive and fungal infections. This demonstrates the probable interaction of lactoferrin with the gastrointestinal tract microflora effecting common gram-positive skin and central venous catheter bloodstream infections, as central venous catheter days and time to reach full enteral feedings were similar between groups.6 While BLF did not change fungal colonization, it prevented progression to infection, thus potentially allowing fungi to maintain their symbiotic role in the gut and helping to maintain a balanced microflora.

Fluconazole prophylaxis has demonstrated efficacy in reducing invasive Candida infections in single and multicenter randomized controlled trials.7 However, intravenous immunoglobulin products and colony-stimulating factors have not proven effective in preventing infections, largely because many elements of the immune system are underdeveloped in preterm infants.8 - 9 Lactoferrin has many functions and is a key link in several immune processes.6 This may in part explain the large effect demonstrated by Manzoni et al.1

Lactoferrin is the major whey protein in human milk and is involved in innate host defenses having antimicrobial and immunomodulation activities as well as promoting a mature and healthy gut.6 ,10 - 11 Bovine lactoferrin has activity against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, fungi, and viruses such as rotavirus, enterovirus, and adenovirus.6 This includes antilipopolysaccharide (against gram-negative organisms), antilipoteichoic acid (against gram-positive organisms), and anti-Candida cell wall component activity.10 Lactoferrin passes through the stomach, allowing it to act in the entire gastrointestinal tract, and is largely excreted in the stools unchanged. Furthermore, lactoferrin is converted via pepsin and low pH into a potent antimicrobial peptide, lactoferricin, which can eradicate ingested pathogens and bind endotoxin in the stomach. Indirectly, lactoferrin binds iron, making it unavailable to support microbial growth and preventing bacterial invasion of the bowel by blocking adherence of bacteria to the gut epithelia.

The immunomodulatory properties of lactoferrin include reducing inflammation by decreasing production of tumor necrosis factor α and other proinflammatory molecules and by regulating the immune response, protecting against severe inflammation related to infection and septic shock.11 - 12 This may contribute to decreasing the mortality and neurodevelopmental impairment associated with bloodstream infections. Moreover, lactoferrin contributes to intestinal cell proliferation and differentiation, which enhances the gut barrier and promotes the growth of bifidobacteria, helping to establish a favorable microbiome.13

Because colostrum contains the highest lactoferrin content (6 g/L, vs 1-5 g/L in mature human milk), nature is providing “added protection” for a short period to full-term infants—but for preterm infants this added protection is needed for weeks or months. Very low-birth-weight infants receiving human milk have inadequate protection because it can take 2 to 3 weeks until they receive full-volume enteral feedings and the full amounts of the protective components in human milk. Even this may not be enough until infants are close to full-term corrected age.

The study by Manzoni et al1 used BLF rather than human lactoferrin (HLF). Both HLF and BLF have high homology (77%). Industry is currently able to produce highly purified BLF as well as recombinant HLF. Bovine lactoferrin and lactoferricin exhibit higher antimicrobial activity compared with their human counterparts.13 - 14 However, the comparative safety and efficacy of BLF compared to HLF in preterm infants will be an important question to answer in future studies, as will be finding the optimal dosing of each.

Future research should be directed at confirming the safety and efficacy of lactoferrin in VLBW infants, including more extremely preterm infants, because they potentially will benefit the most from lactoferrin. Combination strategies,15 such as the use of BLF plus LGG in the study by Manzoni et al,1 should be pursued, and substances that might affect lactoferrin activity, such as iron supplementation, should be investigated. The effect of lactoferrin on hematocrit should be monitored, and the effects of lactoferrin on neurodevelopmental outcome, hospital length of stay, and costs should be studied.

The beginnings of further research are under way. A phase 1 multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled study (clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00854633) has begun, assessing a recombinant HLF product to prevent neonatal infections in infants weighing 750 to 1500 g, using dosing of 150 mg/kg every 12 hours. Manzoni et al are further studying the effect of BLF alone or in combination with LGG on the primary end point of necrotizing enterocolitis.16

The results of the current study by Manzoni et al provide the opportunity to make further research on lactoferrin a priority. For this vulnerable population of extremely preterm infants, it is important to move forward in a timely fashion to prevent nosocomial infections, infection-related mortality, and associated neurodevelopmental impairment.

AUTHOR INFORMATION

Corresponding Author: David A. Kaufman, MD, Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Virginia Health System, Box 800386, Charlottesville, VA 22908 (dak4r@virginia.edu).

Financial Disclosures: None reported.

Editorials represent the opinions of the authors and JAMA and not those of the American Medical Association.

Manzoni P, Rinaldi M, Cattani S,  et al; for the Italian Task Force for the Study and Prevention of Neonatal Fungal Infections, the Italian Society of Neonatology.  Bovine lactoferrin supplementation for prevention of late-onset sepsis in very low-birth-weight neonates: a randomized trial.  JAMA. 2009;302(13):1421-1428
CrossRef
Stoll BJ, Hansen N, Fanaroff AA,  et al.  Late-onset sepsis in very low birth weight neonates: the experience of the NICHD Neonatal Research Network.  Pediatrics. 2002;110(2, pt 1):285-291
PubMedCrossRef
Stoll BJ, Hansen NI, Adams-Chapman I,  et al; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network.  Neurodevelopmental and growth impairment among extremely low-birth-weight infants with neonatal infection.  JAMA. 2004;292(19):2357-2365
PubMedCrossRef
Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Ventura SJ. Births: preliminary data for 2007.  Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2009;57(12):3-18
Payne NR, Carpenter JH, Badger GJ, Horbar JD, Rogowski J. Marginal increase in cost and excess length of stay associated with nosocomial bloodstream infections in surviving very low birth weight infants.  Pediatrics. 2004;114(2):348-355
PubMedCrossRef
Yamauchi K, Wakabayashi H, Shin K, Takase M. Bovine lactoferrin: benefits and mechanism of action against infections.  Biochem Cell Biol. 2006;84(3):291-296
PubMedCrossRef
Kaufman DA. Fluconazole prophylaxis: can we eliminate invasive Candida infections in the neonatal ICU?  Curr Opin Pediatr. 2008;20(3):332-340
PubMedCrossRef
Shah PS, Kaufman DA. Antistaphylococcal immunoglobulins to prevent staphylococcal infection in very low birth weight infants.  Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(2):CD006449
PubMed
Kaufman D, Fairchild KD. Clinical microbiology of bacterial and fungal sepsis in very-low-birth-weight infants.  Clin Microbiol Rev. 2004;17(3):638-680
PubMedCrossRef
Brock JH. The physiology of lactoferrin.  Biochem Cell Biol. 2002;80(1):1-6
PubMedCrossRef
Berlutti F, Schippa S, Morea C,  et al.  Lactoferrin downregulates pro-inflammatory cytokines upexpressed in intestinal epithelial cells infected with invasive or noninvasive Escherichia coli strains.  Biochem Cell Biol. 2006;84(3):351-357
PubMedCrossRef
Otsuki K, Yakuwa K, Sawada M,  et al.  Recombinant human lactoferrin has preventive effects on lipopolysaccharide-induced preterm delivery and production of inflammatory cytokines in mice.  J Perinat Med. 2005;33(4):320-323
PubMedCrossRef
Buccigrossi V, de Marco G, Bruzzese E,  et al.  Lactoferrin induces concentration-dependent functional modulation of intestinal proliferation and differentiation.  Pediatr Res. 2007;61(4):410-414
PubMedCrossRef
Vorland LH, Ulvatne H, Andersen J,  et al.  Lactoferricin of bovine origin is more active than lactoferricins of human, murine and caprine origin.  Scand J Infect Dis. 1998;30(5):513-517
PubMedCrossRef
Sherman MP, Bennett SH, Hwang FF, Yu C. Neonatal small bowel epithelia: enhancing anti-bacterial defense with lactoferrin and Lactobacillus GG.  Biometals. 2004;17(3):285-289
PubMedCrossRef
 Neonatal Sepsis Club. Lactoferrin: hot new peptide or long time friend in human milk? Presented at: Pediatric Academic Societies Annual Meeting; May 2-5, 2009; Baltimore, MD 

First Page Preview

First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

Manzoni P, Rinaldi M, Cattani S,  et al; for the Italian Task Force for the Study and Prevention of Neonatal Fungal Infections, the Italian Society of Neonatology.  Bovine lactoferrin supplementation for prevention of late-onset sepsis in very low-birth-weight neonates: a randomized trial.  JAMA. 2009;302(13):1421-1428
CrossRef
Stoll BJ, Hansen N, Fanaroff AA,  et al.  Late-onset sepsis in very low birth weight neonates: the experience of the NICHD Neonatal Research Network.  Pediatrics. 2002;110(2, pt 1):285-291
PubMedCrossRef
Stoll BJ, Hansen NI, Adams-Chapman I,  et al; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network.  Neurodevelopmental and growth impairment among extremely low-birth-weight infants with neonatal infection.  JAMA. 2004;292(19):2357-2365
PubMedCrossRef
Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Ventura SJ. Births: preliminary data for 2007.  Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2009;57(12):3-18
Payne NR, Carpenter JH, Badger GJ, Horbar JD, Rogowski J. Marginal increase in cost and excess length of stay associated with nosocomial bloodstream infections in surviving very low birth weight infants.  Pediatrics. 2004;114(2):348-355
PubMedCrossRef
Yamauchi K, Wakabayashi H, Shin K, Takase M. Bovine lactoferrin: benefits and mechanism of action against infections.  Biochem Cell Biol. 2006;84(3):291-296
PubMedCrossRef
Kaufman DA. Fluconazole prophylaxis: can we eliminate invasive Candida infections in the neonatal ICU?  Curr Opin Pediatr. 2008;20(3):332-340
PubMedCrossRef
Shah PS, Kaufman DA. Antistaphylococcal immunoglobulins to prevent staphylococcal infection in very low birth weight infants.  Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(2):CD006449
PubMed
Kaufman D, Fairchild KD. Clinical microbiology of bacterial and fungal sepsis in very-low-birth-weight infants.  Clin Microbiol Rev. 2004;17(3):638-680
PubMedCrossRef
Brock JH. The physiology of lactoferrin.  Biochem Cell Biol. 2002;80(1):1-6
PubMedCrossRef
Berlutti F, Schippa S, Morea C,  et al.  Lactoferrin downregulates pro-inflammatory cytokines upexpressed in intestinal epithelial cells infected with invasive or noninvasive Escherichia coli strains.  Biochem Cell Biol. 2006;84(3):351-357
PubMedCrossRef
Otsuki K, Yakuwa K, Sawada M,  et al.  Recombinant human lactoferrin has preventive effects on lipopolysaccharide-induced preterm delivery and production of inflammatory cytokines in mice.  J Perinat Med. 2005;33(4):320-323
PubMedCrossRef
Buccigrossi V, de Marco G, Bruzzese E,  et al.  Lactoferrin induces concentration-dependent functional modulation of intestinal proliferation and differentiation.  Pediatr Res. 2007;61(4):410-414
PubMedCrossRef
Vorland LH, Ulvatne H, Andersen J,  et al.  Lactoferricin of bovine origin is more active than lactoferricins of human, murine and caprine origin.  Scand J Infect Dis. 1998;30(5):513-517
PubMedCrossRef
Sherman MP, Bennett SH, Hwang FF, Yu C. Neonatal small bowel epithelia: enhancing anti-bacterial defense with lactoferrin and Lactobacillus GG.  Biometals. 2004;17(3):285-289
PubMedCrossRef
 Neonatal Sepsis Club. Lactoferrin: hot new peptide or long time friend in human milk? Presented at: Pediatric Academic Societies Annual Meeting; May 2-5, 2009; Baltimore, MD 
CME Course for:


You need to register in order to view this quiz.


To understand the clinical management of acute heart failure syndromes.
Accreditation Information The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
To view and print your certificate and access a summary of your CME courses go to My CME.
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s “Cited By” API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Response

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics
PubMed Articles
JAMAevidence.com