0
Letters |

Abstract Acceptance and Blinded Peer ReviewAbstract Acceptance and Blinded Peer Review

JAMA. 2006;296(10):1230-1231. doi:10.1001/jama.296.10.1230-b
Text Size: A A A
Published online

AUTHOR INFORMATION

Letters Section Editor: Robert M. Golub, MD, Senior Editor.

ABSTRACT ACCEPTANCE AND BLINDED PEER REVIEW

To the Editor: Dr Ross and colleagues1 provided evidence that the likelihood of acceptance of abstracts submitted for presentation at the American Heart Association annual scientific sessions was affected by the type of peer review. There was a higher percentage of abstracts accepted from authors from the United States, other English-speaking countries, and prestigious academic institutions with open rather than blinded peer review. They conclude that adoption of blinded peer review by scientific research meetings is a reasonable, low-cost intervention with substantial benefit and that future research should evaluate the effect of blinded peer review on manuscript reviewer bias.

However, their findings may not lead to these conclusions because they did not directly assess and compare the quality of research submitted in the form of abstracts by authors of different countries and institutions. Although it is perhaps challenging to perform, this would be the only way to derive a conclusion regarding the existence of a geographical and institutional reviewer bias.

Ross et al note several factors that may lead to considerable difference in the quality of research by authors from different countries and institutions. Knowing the identity of the authors and their institutions and, thus, being able to consider variables such as the quality record of previous publications and information regarding sponsorship and research funding may actually be beneficial in performing a fair and effective evaluation of research.

At a time of need for more openness in the peer review process, practices that provide as fair an evaluation of abstracts and manuscripts as possible should be supported. For example, peer reviewers may improve the quality of their evaluations if they are given feedback regarding their evaluation and how it compares with those of others. This may increase reviewers' awareness of various biases that may lead to unfair and ineffective review. In addition, openly signing the peer review may discourage reviewers from reacting based on biases. Finally, international meetings may modify their policies by readjusting the proportion of reviewers from various countries and institutions.

Financial Disclosures: None reported.

References
Ross JS, Gross CP, Desai MM.  et al.  Effect of blinded peer review on abstract acceptance.  JAMA. 2006;2951675-1680
PubMed

First Page Preview

First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

Ross JS, Gross CP, Desai MM.  et al.  Effect of blinded peer review on abstract acceptance.  JAMA. 2006;2951675-1680
PubMed
CME Course for:


You need to register in order to view this quiz.


To understand the clinical management of acute heart failure syndromes.
Accreditation Information The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
To view and print your certificate and access a summary of your CME courses go to My CME.
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s “Cited By” API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Response

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.