0
Letters |

Risk Stratification for In-Hospital Mortality in Acutely Decompensated Heart FailureRisk Stratification for In-Hospital Mortality in Acutely Decompensated Heart Failure

JAMA. 2005;293(20):2467-2468. doi:10.1001/jama.293.20.2467-c
Text Size: A A A
Published online

AUTHOR INFORMATION

Letters Section Editor: Robert M. Golub, MD, Senior Editor.

RISK STRATIFICATION FOR IN-HOSPITAL MORTALITY IN ACUTELY DECOMPENSATED HEART FAILURE

To the Editor: Dr Fonarow and colleagues1 estimate a risk model for in-hospital mortality in acutely decompensated heart failure using a large data set (>33 000 patients) and validate it on an equally large independent data set. However, their conclusion that a classification and regression tree (CART) model performs better than a linear logistic model in predicting the risk of death in patients with acutely decompensated heart failure is surprising. In the independent data set, the CART model yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.668 compared with 0.757 for the logistic model. Although apparently modest, this represents a large difference in performance. A useless model would on average have an AUROC of 0.5. Subtracting 0.5 from the AUROC and considering a scale from 0 to 0.5 (the upper limit), the relative improvement offered by the logistic model is (0.257-0.168)/0.168 or 53%, which is considerable.

The authors argue that their CART model is easier for clinical use than the presumably complex logistic model. In fact, the latter has only 4 predictors compared with 3 for the CART model. It is straightforward to scale the weights of a logistic model to whole numbers to make the arithmetic in calculating the risk score easy. A simple table can provide data to convert the risk score into a probability of dying.

The dichotomization of the continuous predictors in the CART model (a necessary consequence of CART) has led to a substantial loss of information. The ability of the CART model to discriminate between patients with a good and a poor prognosis is significantly reduced compared with the logistic model. Use of the CART model would lead to an unnecessary increase in the chance of suboptimal clinical management of patients with acutely decompensated heart failure compared with use of the logistic regression model.

In general, we recommend the use of continuous predictors in risk models without dichotomization or categorization.2 The creation of risk groups should be the final stage after the model-building process is complete. It is particularly undesirable to dichotomize continuous predictors before building a model.

References
Fonarow GC, Adams KF Jr, Abraham WT, Yancy CW, Boscardin WJ.ADHERE Scientific Advisory Committee, Study Group, and Investigators.  Risk stratification for in-hospital mortality in acutely decompensated heart failure: classification and regression tree analysis.  JAMA. 2005;293572-580
PubMed
Altman DG. Categorizing continuous variables. In: Armitage P, Colton T, eds. Encyclopedia of Biostatistics. 2nd ed. Chichester, England: John Wiley; 2005:708–711

First Page Preview

First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

Fonarow GC, Adams KF Jr, Abraham WT, Yancy CW, Boscardin WJ.ADHERE Scientific Advisory Committee, Study Group, and Investigators.  Risk stratification for in-hospital mortality in acutely decompensated heart failure: classification and regression tree analysis.  JAMA. 2005;293572-580
PubMed
Altman DG. Categorizing continuous variables. In: Armitage P, Colton T, eds. Encyclopedia of Biostatistics. 2nd ed. Chichester, England: John Wiley; 2005:708–711
CME Course for:


You need to register in order to view this quiz.


To understand the clinical management of acute heart failure syndromes.
Accreditation Information The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
To view and print your certificate and access a summary of your CME courses go to My CME.
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s “Cited By” API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Response

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.