0
Letters |

Chlorthalidone vs Other Low-Dose DiureticsChlorthalidone vs Other Low-Dose Diuretics

JAMA. 2004;292(15):1816-1817. doi:10.1001/jama.292.15.1816-c
Text Size: A A A
Published online

AUTHOR INFORMATION

Letters Section Editor: Robert M. Golub, MD, Senior Editor.

CHLORTHALIDONE VS OTHER LOW-DOSE DIURETICS

To the Editor: Dr Psaty and colleagues1 compared the results of 2 meta-analyses, each of which looked individually at the efficacy of either chlorthalidone or other low-dose diuretics compared with placebo, not with each other. Based on small efficacy differences, Psaty et al concluded that “major health outcomes for chlorthalidone and other thiazide-like drugs appear to be similar.” We believe that it is necessary to directly compare treatments to reach conclusions about differences between them.

Evidence from active control clinical trials distinguishes chlorthalidone from diuretics that are similar but hardly identical.2 After an interim analysis at 5 years of follow-up in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial (MRFIT), the steering committee recommended that only chlorthalidone (and not hydrochlorothiazide) be used in the intervention arm.3 In the 9 clinics whose staff initially prescribed predominantly hydrochlorothiazide, coronary heart disease (CHD) mortality and all-cause mortality were increased by 44% and 16%, respectively, compared with usual care. In the 6 clinics whose staff predominantly used chlorthalidone, CHD mortality and all-cause mortality were decreased by 58% and 41%, respectively, compared with usual care. After changing diuretics, the CHD and all-cause mortality in clinics whose staff had initially predominantly used hydrochlorothiazide decreased by 28% and 26%, respectively, compared with usual care, over the ensuing 5 years. The longer-term success of treatment in MRFIT’s special intervention arm may be attributable in part to chlorthalidone, as men randomized to care in the community predominantly received hydrochlorothiazide.3

Contrasting results from 2 simultaneously-performed randomized clinical trials in North America and Australia also support the benefits of chlorthalidone. In the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT), chlorthalidone was superior to lisinopril in reducing blood pressure and in preventing stroke, combined cardiovascular events, and heart failure.4 In the Second Australian National Blood Pressure Trial, enalapril was found to be superior to hydrochlorothiazide in preventing major cardiovascular events or death in men, despite roughly equal reductions in blood pressure.5 Chlorthalidone is 50% to 100% more potent than hydrochlorothiazide on an equal-dosage basis, and has a much longer serum elimination half-life.2 We believe the evidence from active control clinical trials supports its use over other thiazide-type diuretics.

References
Psaty BM, Lumley T, Furberg CD. Meta-analysis of health outcomes of chlorthalidone-based vs nonchlorthalidone-based low dose diuretic therapies.  JAMA. 2004;29243-44
PubMed
Carter BL, Ernst ME, Cohen JD. Hydrochlorothiazide versus chlorthalidone: evidence supporting their interchangeability.  Hypertension. 2004;434-9
PubMed
Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial Research Group.  Mortality after 10 years for hypertensive participants in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial.  Circulation. 1990;821616-1628
PubMed
ALLHAT Officers and Coordinators for the ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group.  Major outcomes in high-risk hypertensive patients randomized to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blocker vs diuretic: the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT).  JAMA. 2002;2882981-2997
PubMed
Wing LM, Reid CM, Ryan P.  et al. Second Australian National Blood Pressure Study Group.  A comparison of outcomes with angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors and diuretics for hypertension in the elderly.  N Engl J Med. 2003;348583-592
PubMed

First Page Preview

First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

Psaty BM, Lumley T, Furberg CD. Meta-analysis of health outcomes of chlorthalidone-based vs nonchlorthalidone-based low dose diuretic therapies.  JAMA. 2004;29243-44
PubMed
Carter BL, Ernst ME, Cohen JD. Hydrochlorothiazide versus chlorthalidone: evidence supporting their interchangeability.  Hypertension. 2004;434-9
PubMed
Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial Research Group.  Mortality after 10 years for hypertensive participants in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial.  Circulation. 1990;821616-1628
PubMed
ALLHAT Officers and Coordinators for the ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group.  Major outcomes in high-risk hypertensive patients randomized to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blocker vs diuretic: the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT).  JAMA. 2002;2882981-2997
PubMed
Wing LM, Reid CM, Ryan P.  et al. Second Australian National Blood Pressure Study Group.  A comparison of outcomes with angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors and diuretics for hypertension in the elderly.  N Engl J Med. 2003;348583-592
PubMed
CME Course for:


You need to register in order to view this quiz.


To understand the clinical management of acute heart failure syndromes.
Accreditation Information The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
To view and print your certificate and access a summary of your CME courses go to My CME.
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s “Cited By” API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Response

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.