0
Letters |

Supplemental Oxygen and Risk of Surgical Site InfectionSupplemental Oxygen and Risk of Surgical Site Infection

JAMA. 2004;291(16):1956-1956. doi:10.1001/jama.291.16.1956-a
Text Size: A A A
Published online

AUTHOR INFORMATION

Letters Section Editor: Stephen J. Lurie, MD, PhD, Senior Editor.

SUPPLEMENTAL OXYGEN AND RISK OF SURGICAL SITE INFECTION

To the Editor: Dr Pryor and colleagues1 reported that patients who received 80% inspired oxygen during and 2 hours after abdominal surgery had a significantly higher rate of surgical site infections (SSIs) than did those who received 35% oxygen. Although the authors controlled the concentration of inspired oxygen, they apparently did not consider other crucial factors such as fluid management, temperature, anesthetic management, and pain control. Tissue perfusion, and thus oxygenation, is often inadequate when these variables are not closely monitored and controlled.2

By contrast, Greif et al3 reported that 80% inspired oxygen decreased SSIs by 50%, after controlling for these other factors. Pryor et al did not report whether they attempted to optimize tissue perfusion, a factor recognized as critical by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.4

There are a number of other problems with the study. For example, the sample is smaller and more heterogeneous than that in the study by Greif et al. Furthermore, the 2 groups appear to have differed in their baseline comorbid conditions. Patients receiving 80% oxygen were more likely to be obese, had longer operations, and lost more blood. All these factors may be associated with increased risk of SSI. Five patients in the group receiving 80% oxygen remained intubated in the postanesthesia care unit vs only 1 in the group receiving 35% oxygen, a factor that was significantly associated with SSI using multivariate analysis. The high infection rate (25%) in the group receiving 80% oxygen further suggests failure of randomization and/or inadequate sample size. Finally, wound infections were identified by retrospective chart review, a notoriously inaccurate approach.5

References
Pryor KO, Fahey 3rd TJ, Lien CA, Goldstein PA. Surgical site infection and the routine use of perioperative hyperoxia in a general surgical population: a randomized controlled trial.  JAMA.2004;291:79-87.
PubMed
Hopf HW, Hunt TK, West JM. Wound tissue oxygen tension predicts the risk of wound infection in surgical patients.  Arch Surg.1997;132:997-1005.
PubMed
Greif R, Akça O, Horn E-P, Kurz A, Sessler DI.  et al. for the Outcomes Research Group.  Supplemental perioperative oxygen to reduce the incidence of surgical-wound infection.  N Engl J Med.2000;342:161-167.
PubMed
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee.  Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999.  Am J Infect Control.1999;27:97-132.
PubMed
Leaper DJ, Melling AG. Antibiotic prophylaxis in clean surgery: clean non-implant wounds.  J Chemother.2001;13:96-101.
PubMed

First Page Preview

First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

Pryor KO, Fahey 3rd TJ, Lien CA, Goldstein PA. Surgical site infection and the routine use of perioperative hyperoxia in a general surgical population: a randomized controlled trial.  JAMA.2004;291:79-87.
PubMed
Hopf HW, Hunt TK, West JM. Wound tissue oxygen tension predicts the risk of wound infection in surgical patients.  Arch Surg.1997;132:997-1005.
PubMed
Greif R, Akça O, Horn E-P, Kurz A, Sessler DI.  et al. for the Outcomes Research Group.  Supplemental perioperative oxygen to reduce the incidence of surgical-wound infection.  N Engl J Med.2000;342:161-167.
PubMed
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee.  Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999.  Am J Infect Control.1999;27:97-132.
PubMed
Leaper DJ, Melling AG. Antibiotic prophylaxis in clean surgery: clean non-implant wounds.  J Chemother.2001;13:96-101.
PubMed
CME Course for:


You need to register in order to view this quiz.


To understand the clinical management of acute heart failure syndromes.
Accreditation Information The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
To view and print your certificate and access a summary of your CME courses go to My CME.
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s “Cited By” API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Response

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.