0
Letters |

Use of Coronary Calcification Scores to Predict Coronary Heart DiseaseUse of Coronary Calcification Scores to Predict Coronary Heart Disease

JAMA. 2004;291(15):1831-1831. doi:10.1001/jama.291.15.1831-a
Text Size: A A A
Published online

AUTHOR INFORMATION

Letters Section Editor: Stephen J. Lurie, MD, PhD, Senior Editor.

USE OF CORONARY CALCIFICATION SCORES TO PREDICT CORONARY HEART DISEASE

To the Editor: Dr Greenland and colleagues1 reported that both the Framingham Risk Score (FRS) and the coronary artery calcium score (CACS) were predictive of coronary artery disease. The authors also reported that across categories of FRS, CACS was predictive of risk among patients with an FRS higher than 10%, but not with an FRS less than 10%. Furthermore, the CACS was less predictive than the FRS (hazard ratio, 3.9 vs 14.3), and only added slightly to the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve using FRS alone.

We point out that the FRS has a wide confidence interval (5.1%-6.9%) depending on the number of initial measurements in this type of patient2 and so it is possible that no significant difference exists given the size of the ROC envelope for the FRS and the small numbers of events that occurred in the study. The original cohort for the FRS included a larger proportion of smokers (40%) than is currently present in the population, and it is likely that the performance of the FRS was better than that observed now due to risk-factor drift away from smoking and toward diabetes.3 Modification of the FRS by the addition of inflammatory markers (eg, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein [hsCRP]) has been suggested as a way to improve performance,4 but this may be limited by large biological variation. While the combination of FRS and hsCRP levels might have been superior to the combination of FRS and CACS, the authors did not measure hsCRP levels.

Finally, we suspect that this study did not include patients with diabetes, given the National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines. However, the FRS used in many countries does include diabetes as a variable. The high rate of arterial calcification in this group may further confound estimates of risk determined by CACS scores.

References
Greenland P, LaBree L, Azen SP, Doherty TM, Detrano RC. Coronary artery calcium score combined with Framingham score for risk prediction in asymptomatic individuals.  JAMA.2004;291:210-215.
PubMed
Reynolds TM, Twomey P, Wierzbicki AS. Accuracy of cardiovascular risk estimation in patients without diabetes.  J Cardiovasc Risk.2002;9:183-190.
PubMed
Twomey P, Reynolds TM, Wierzbicki AS. Concordance evaluation of coronary risk scores—implications for CHD risk screening.  Curr Med Res Opin.In press.
Ridker P, Glynn RJ, Hennekens CH. C-reactive protein adds to the predictive value of total and HDL cholesterol in determining risk of first myocardial infarction.  Circulation.1998;97:2007-2011.
PubMed

First Page Preview

First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

Greenland P, LaBree L, Azen SP, Doherty TM, Detrano RC. Coronary artery calcium score combined with Framingham score for risk prediction in asymptomatic individuals.  JAMA.2004;291:210-215.
PubMed
Reynolds TM, Twomey P, Wierzbicki AS. Accuracy of cardiovascular risk estimation in patients without diabetes.  J Cardiovasc Risk.2002;9:183-190.
PubMed
Twomey P, Reynolds TM, Wierzbicki AS. Concordance evaluation of coronary risk scores—implications for CHD risk screening.  Curr Med Res Opin.In press.
Ridker P, Glynn RJ, Hennekens CH. C-reactive protein adds to the predictive value of total and HDL cholesterol in determining risk of first myocardial infarction.  Circulation.1998;97:2007-2011.
PubMed
CME Course for:


You need to register in order to view this quiz.


To understand the clinical management of acute heart failure syndromes.
Accreditation Information The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
To view and print your certificate and access a summary of your CME courses go to My CME.
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s “Cited By” API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Response

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.