0
Letters |

Magnets for Patients With Heel PainMagnets for Patients With Heel Pain

JAMA. 2004;291(1):43-44. doi:10.1001/jama.291.1.43-b
Text Size: A A A
Published online

AUTHOR INFORMATION

Letters Section Editor: Stephen J. Lurie, MD, PhD, Senior Editor.

MAGNETS FOR PATIENTS WITH HEEL PAIN

To the Editor: Dr Winemiller and colleagues1 found that magnetic insoles did not improve symptoms among patients with chronic heel pain. I question the methods used to arrive at this conclusion.

Plantar heel pain is common and has many causes. The ability to distinguish various foot conditions by clinical examination alone can be fraught with error because of symptom overlap and spectrum bias.2 3 There is no evidence that patients in the study by Winemuller et al had magnetic resonance imaging, radiographs, or nerve conduction studies. There is also no mention of patients' weights, activity levels, or whether or not they had diabetes mellitus.

Plantar fasciitis originates in the calcaneal region. However, in this study the magnetic foil was placed under the proximal arch of the foot and therefore the calcaneal region may not have received magnetic exposure. Because morning pain is an important symptom of plantar fasciitis, it is surprising that the authors did not have the patients wear the magnetic devices continually during sleep, or better, for 24 hours per day. Other studies have reported that wearing night splints that maintain the arch can decrease morning pain by up to 88%.4

Winemiller et al treated symptoms refractory for up to 14 years with magnetic application of only 4 hours per day, 4 days per week, for 8 weeks. Therefore, during the 2-month study period, patients received only 16 hours of magnetic exposure of a possible total of 168 hours per week. The authors also did not cite my randomized placebo-controlled trial of magnetotherapy in diabetic peripheral neuropathy, another cause of foot pain, which found statistically significant benefits from cumulative exposure.5

At this stage, it would be premature to either advocate or reject the use of magnetic insoles in plantar fasciitis because this study clearly failed to effectively test the hypothesis.

References
Winemiller MH, Billow RG, Laskowski ER, Harmsen WS. Effect of magnetic vs sham-magnetic insoles on plantar heel pain: a randomized controlled trial.  JAMA.2003;290:1474-1478.
PubMed
Mulherin SA, Miller WC. Spectrum bias or spectrum effect? subgroup variation in diagnostic test evaluation.  Ann Intern Med.2002;137:598-602.
PubMed
Gill LH. Plantar fasciitis: diagnosis and conservative management.  J Am Acad Orthop Surg.1997;5:109-117.
PubMed
Wapner KL, Sharkey PF. The use of night splints for treatment of recalcitrant plantar fasciitis.  Foot Ankle.1991;12:135-137.
PubMed
Weintraub MI, Wolfe GI, Barohn RA.  et al.  Static magnetic field therapy for symptomatic diabetic neuropathy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil.2003;84:736-746.
PubMed

First Page Preview

First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

Winemiller MH, Billow RG, Laskowski ER, Harmsen WS. Effect of magnetic vs sham-magnetic insoles on plantar heel pain: a randomized controlled trial.  JAMA.2003;290:1474-1478.
PubMed
Mulherin SA, Miller WC. Spectrum bias or spectrum effect? subgroup variation in diagnostic test evaluation.  Ann Intern Med.2002;137:598-602.
PubMed
Gill LH. Plantar fasciitis: diagnosis and conservative management.  J Am Acad Orthop Surg.1997;5:109-117.
PubMed
Wapner KL, Sharkey PF. The use of night splints for treatment of recalcitrant plantar fasciitis.  Foot Ankle.1991;12:135-137.
PubMed
Weintraub MI, Wolfe GI, Barohn RA.  et al.  Static magnetic field therapy for symptomatic diabetic neuropathy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil.2003;84:736-746.
PubMed
CME Course for:


You need to register in order to view this quiz.


To understand the clinical management of acute heart failure syndromes.
Accreditation Information The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
To view and print your certificate and access a summary of your CME courses go to My CME.
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s “Cited By” API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Response

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.