0
Letters |

Results of Clinical Trials Sponsored by For-Profit vs Nonprofit EntitiesResults of Clinical Trials Sponsored by For-Profit vs Nonprofit Entities

JAMA. 2003;290(23):3070-3070. doi:10.1001/jama.290.23.3070-a
Text Size: A A A
Published online

AUTHOR INFORMATION

Letters Section Editor: Stephen J. Lurie, MD, PhD, Senior Editor.

RESULTS OF CLINICAL TRIALS SPONSORED BY FOR-PROFIT VS NONPROFIT ENTITIES

To the Editor: Dr Als-Nielsen and colleagues1 found that trials funded by for-profit organizations favored the active drug more commonly than placebo. The authors concluded that this may have been due to biased interpretation of trial results. However, an association between funding and study conclusions is not surprising.

A major reason for this, which the authors alluded to briefly, is the "violation of the uncertainty principle," an unfortunate phrase, as it implies error or some nefarious or underhanded activity. There really is no reason to expect that "half of all [published] trials should favor the control intervention." While equipoise may be present in at least some trials sponsored by nonprofit organizations, it is unrealistic to think that there is anything like equipoise in studies sponsored by industry. It is not the business of pharmaceutical companies to do such studies; they are in the business of confirming efficacy. No pharmaceutical company would perform an expensive phase 3 study if it thought the probability of a positive outcome was only 50%. After a positive phase 2 program, one expects a considerably higher probability of success. So it is not surprising that such studies "have a higher likelihood of favoring the experimental drug." In addition, I believe that studies from for-profit organizations, conducted under the watchful eyes of regulatory agencies, are more likely to be better studies (ie, to have adequate double blinding), which would explain the association between double blinding and recommending the experimental drug.

Had the authors included the purpose of the study as a covariate in the analysis (eg, phase 3 study for drug approval), such a factor would be likely to be even more highly correlated with conclusions than sponsorship, although it might be difficult to find many such studies performed by nonprofit institutions.

Financial Disclosure: Dr Palmer is employed by Forest Laboratories Inc and was previously employed by GlaxoSmithKline.

References
Als-Nielsen B, Chen W, Gluud C, Kjaergard LL. Association of funding and conclusions in randomized drug trials: a reflection of treatment effect or adverse events?  JAMA.2003;290:921-928.
PubMed

First Page Preview

First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

Als-Nielsen B, Chen W, Gluud C, Kjaergard LL. Association of funding and conclusions in randomized drug trials: a reflection of treatment effect or adverse events?  JAMA.2003;290:921-928.
PubMed
CME Course for:


You need to register in order to view this quiz.


To understand the clinical management of acute heart failure syndromes.
Accreditation Information The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
To view and print your certificate and access a summary of your CME courses go to My CME.
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s “Cited By” API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Response

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.