To the Editor: Dr Verstappen and colleagues1 found that a practice-based, multifaceted strategy
using guidelines, feedback, and social interaction resulted in modest improvements
in the quality of test ordering by Dutch primary care physicians. In the intervention,
physicians received 3 personal feedback reports on 3 different clinical problems,
discussed these in small group meetings, related them to evidence-based guidelines,
and made plans for change. Such multifaceted interventions are time consuming,
and therefore difficult to implement for the large spectrum of clinical problems
that primary care physicians face. Furthermore, many studies have found that
the effects of information and feedback are limited, and the effects may disappear
soon after the end of intervention.2 In
their literature review, for instance, Wensing et al3 concluded
that some, but not all, multifaceted interventions are effective, but that
information linked to performance generally was not effective. Large-scale
interventions, related to sustained change in all possible test-ordering situations,
are likely to be ineffective. Thus, I wonder if this is the way to proceed
in improving test-ordering behavior.