0
Letters |

Strategies to Improve Test Ordering in Primary CareStrategies to Improve Test Ordering in Primary Care

JAMA. 2003;290(17):2253-2253. doi:10.1001/jama.290.17.2253-a
Text Size: A A A
Published online

AUTHOR INFORMATION

Letters Section Editor: Stephen J. Lurie, MD, PhD, Senior Editor.

STRATEGIES TO IMPROVE TEST ORDERING IN PRIMARY CARE

To the Editor: Dr Verstappen and colleagues1 found that a practice-based, multifaceted strategy using guidelines, feedback, and social interaction resulted in modest improvements in the quality of test ordering by Dutch primary care physicians. In the intervention, physicians received 3 personal feedback reports on 3 different clinical problems, discussed these in small group meetings, related them to evidence-based guidelines, and made plans for change. Such multifaceted interventions are time consuming, and therefore difficult to implement for the large spectrum of clinical problems that primary care physicians face. Furthermore, many studies have found that the effects of information and feedback are limited, and the effects may disappear soon after the end of intervention.2 In their literature review, for instance, Wensing et al3 concluded that some, but not all, multifaceted interventions are effective, but that information linked to performance generally was not effective. Large-scale interventions, related to sustained change in all possible test-ordering situations, are likely to be ineffective. Thus, I wonder if this is the way to proceed in improving test-ordering behavior.

Verstappen et al also concluded that multifaceted interventions are superior to single interventions. However, they made no comparison to any single intervention. Some of these interventions may in fact be quite effective. In a study of Dutch primary care physicians,4 my colleagues and I found that computer-guided decision support during the actual process of ordering the tests led to much larger effects than those reported by Verstappen et al. Such computer-based interventions are not time consuming, affect behavior at the moment the test is ordered, can be extended to all tests ordered, and can be sustained indefinitely.

I suggest that it is time to move forward to more powerful single and simple interventions rather than to more time-consuming and complex combinations of interventions with limited effectiveness.

References
Verstappen WH, van der Weijden T, Sijbrandij J.  et al.  Effect of a practice-based strategy on test ordering performance of primary care physicians: a randomized trial.  JAMA.2003;289:2407-2412.
PubMed
Axt-Adam P, van der Wouden JC, van der Does E. Influencing behavior of physicians ordering laboratory tests: a literature study.  Med Care.1993;31:784-794.
PubMed
Wensing M, van der Weijden T, Grol R. Implementing guidelines and innovations in general practice: which guidelines are effective?  Br J Gen Pract.1998;48:991-997.
PubMed
van Wijk MA, van der Leij J, Mosseveld M, Bohnen AM, van Bemmel JH. Assessment of decision support for blood test ordering in primary care, a randomized trial.  Ann Intern Med.2001;134:274-281.
PubMed

First Page Preview

First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

Verstappen WH, van der Weijden T, Sijbrandij J.  et al.  Effect of a practice-based strategy on test ordering performance of primary care physicians: a randomized trial.  JAMA.2003;289:2407-2412.
PubMed
Axt-Adam P, van der Wouden JC, van der Does E. Influencing behavior of physicians ordering laboratory tests: a literature study.  Med Care.1993;31:784-794.
PubMed
Wensing M, van der Weijden T, Grol R. Implementing guidelines and innovations in general practice: which guidelines are effective?  Br J Gen Pract.1998;48:991-997.
PubMed
van Wijk MA, van der Leij J, Mosseveld M, Bohnen AM, van Bemmel JH. Assessment of decision support for blood test ordering in primary care, a randomized trial.  Ann Intern Med.2001;134:274-281.
PubMed
CME Course for:


You need to register in order to view this quiz.


To understand the clinical management of acute heart failure syndromes.
Accreditation Information The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
To view and print your certificate and access a summary of your CME courses go to My CME.
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s “Cited By” API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.