0
Special Communication |

Health Risks Associated With Cigar Smoking

Frank Baker, PhD; Stuart R. Ainsworth, MA; Joseph T. Dye, PhD; Corinne Crammer, MM; Michael J. Thun, MD; Dietrich Hoffmann, PhD; James L. Repace, MSc; Jack E. Henningfield, PhD; John Slade, MD; John Pinney, BA; Thomas Shanks, MPH, MS; David M. Burns, MD; Gregory N. Connolly, DMD, MPH; Donald R. Shopland
JAMA. 2000;284(6):735-740. doi:10.1001/jama.284.6.735
Text Size: A A A
Published online

This article summarizes principal findings from a conference convened by the American Cancer Society in June 1998 to examine the health risks of cigar smoking. State-of-the-science reports were presented and 120 attendees (representing government and private agencies, academia, health educators, and tobacco control experts) participated in panels and summary development discussions. The following conclusions were reached by consensus: (1) rates of cigar smoking are rising among both adults and adolescents; (2) smoking cigars instead of cigarettes does not reduce the risk of nicotine addiction; (3) as the number of cigars smoked and the amount of smoke inhaled increases, the risk of death related to cigar smoking approaches that of cigarette smoking; (4) cigar smoke contains higher concentrations of toxic and carcinogenic compounds than cigarettes and is a major source of fine-particle and carbon monoxide indoor air pollution; and (5) cigar smoking is known to cause cancers of the lung and upper aerodigestive tract.

Cigar smoking has increased rapidly in recent years, coincident with the aggressive glamorization and promotion of cigars.1 (pp195-219) The American Cancer Society convened a conference June 15 and 16, 1998, in Washington, DC, to review current knowledge of the health risks of cigar smoking. The 120 invited attendees represented governmental and private agencies, academia, health educators, and tobacco control experts. Tobacco control experts with a specific interest in cigar smoking were invited to present papers. Many of these speakers had review articles published in the recent National Cancer Institute monograph on cigar smoking1 and were asked to provide an update on their research efforts. In addition, a series of panels discussed the implications of the data presented at the conference, and a final panel of all conference attendees provided a forum for summary discussion. This article summarizes the data presented at the conference and the formal discussions at the concluding session.

Cigars are defined by the US Department of the Treasury as "any roll of tobacco wrapped in leaf tobacco or in any substance containing tobacco"; cigarettes are defined as a "roll of tobacco wrapped in paper or a substance not containing tobacco."2 There is no universal agreement on how to classify the many types of cigars available today (Table 1).

Table Grahic Jump LocationTable 1. Cigar Types and Characteristics*

A fundamental difference between cigar and cigarette tobacco is in the processing. Cigars consist of filler (the inner part of the cigar), a binder, and a wrapper, all of which are made with air-cured and fermented tobaccos. US cigarettes contain a blend of heat-cured and air-cured tobaccos as major components and a small percentage of sun-cured (oriental) tobaccos; they do not contain fermented tobacco.

Air-curing tobacco involves hanging the whole tobacco plant or individually primed leaves (if intended for cigar use) in barns or sheds for 30 to 40 days. In heat-curing, leaves of tobacco are hung on tiers in barns where the air is gradually warmed to a temperature of 70°C to 75°C over a period of 5 to 7 days. After curing, the leaves are typically aged for 2 or more years. Fermentation entails packing the tobacco leaves with placement in fermentation rooms for 3 to 5 weeks; they are subsequently removed, repacked, and returned to the fermentation rooms several times to achieve the desired flavor and aroma.

Cigar tobacco compared with US cigarette tobacco is rich in nitrate (1.4%-2.1% vs 0.1%-1.7%). During fermentation, which contributes greatly to the flavor and aroma of cigar tobacco, nitrate is partially reduced to the strong N-nitrosating nitrite, which reacts with amines to form nitrosamines. Cigar tobacco, compared with cigarette tobacco, is rich in the highly carcinogenic N′-nitrosonornicotine (NNN) (3.0-4.5 µg/g vs 1.8-3.0 µg/g) and in 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK) (1.2-4.5 µg/g vs 0.1-1.0 µg/g); these tobacco-specific carcinogens are formed from nornicotine and nicotine. During fermentation, cigar tobacco is greatly reduced in protein, reducing sugars (0.9%-2.7%), phytosterols (0.14%-0.16%), and polyphenols (<0.1%), but in cigarette tobacco, sugar levels range from 5.5% to 20%, phytosterol levels range from 0.3% to 4.5%, and polyphenol levels range from 3.0% to 5.0%. Consequently, cigar smoke is rich in nitrogen oxides (150-300 µg/g of tobacco burned vs 90-150 µg/g from cigarettes), ammonia, and nitrosamines. Furthermore, cigar smoke tends to have a higher pH than cigarette smoke, which increases the amount of free nicotine in the particulate and vapor phases of the smoke.1

Between the years 1993 and 1997, the consumption of all types of cigars in the United States increased by 46.4%, reversing a steady decline (66%) in cigar consumption from 1964 to 1993.1 (pp21-53) Between 1993 and 1997, consumption of large cigars and cigarillos increased 69.4%.4

Premium cigars accounted for only a small part of this increased consumption. The vast majority of cigar smokers smoke other less expensive large cigars; small cigars, known as cigarillos; and little cigars, which resemble cigarettes and are packaged similarly but have a wrapper that contains tobacco (Table 1).1 (55-104)

Data on cigar sales are readily available from the US Department of Agriculture, but prevalence data on current cigar smoking are sparse. Since cigar-smoking rates had remained low for many years, questions on cigar use were omitted from many national health surveys. Surveys among California adults between 1990 and 1996 showed that the increases in cigar smoking occurred primarily among younger more educated adults.5 Some data indicate that adult men are more likely to smoke cigars than adult women and that cigar smoking is increasing among adolescents in both sexes, surpassing the use of smokeless tobacco.6 Data from the 1997 Youth Risk Behavior Survey7 indicated that 31% of male adolescents had smoked at least 1 cigar in the past month and that cigar smoking prevalence among adolescent girls was nearly 11%. Data from the 1998 National Household Survey on Drug Abuse indicate that the rate of current cigar use among those aged 12 years or older increased from 5.9% in 1997 to 6.9% in 1998, a statistically significant increase, and that an estimated 5.6% of youths aged 12 to 17 years were current cigar users in 1998. Statistically significant increases in past-month-cigar use were also reported for (1) white, non-Hispanic males, (2) those living in the Northeast, (3) those with some college education, and (4) the unemployed.8

An additional concern relates to initial evidence suggesting that some adolescent cigar smokers may engage in a practice known as blunting, whereby the cigar filler tobacco is removed and replaced with marijuana and possibly other illicit drugs.9

Beginning in the mid 1980s, the cigar industry intensified its public relations efforts in the United States through strategies such as cigar dinners, product placement in movies, feature stories, sporting events, and the development of cigar-friendly lifestyle magazines (such as Cigar Aficianado). Electronic and print media report America's "rediscovery" of the premium cigar smoked by the affluent and successful members of society.1 1(pp195-219), 10 11 The sale of cigars has expanded from tobacco stores, upscale restaurants, and luxury hotels to availability at gas stations, grocery stores, liquor stores, variety stores, and menswear sections in department stores. These promotional efforts resemble those undertaken in the early stages of the smokeless tobacco campaign, which ultimately became a major health problem.12 13 Advertising and promotional activities for cigars, similar to those for cigarettes, routinely include sexual imagery, affluence, and celebrity endorsement (explicitly and implicitly). Unlike cigarette marketing promotions, those for cigars are not required to mention the potential health risks associated with tobacco use, which gives the impression that cigars are a "safe" product.

National data indicate that 46.6% of cigar smokers surveyed believe that cigar smoking is a high-risk behavior for developing cancer.14 However, they evidence an "optimistic bias" in their estimate of their own risk of developing cancer in the next 20 years: only 8.7% consider themselves to be at high risk.14 16 Compared with nonsmokers, cigar smokers also underestimate the cancer risk of exposure to environmental cigar smoke.14

The glamorized image of cigar smokers presented in the media appears to be accepted both by those who smoke cigars and those who do not. A large fraction of both groups (about 40%) perceive cigar smokers as relatively well-to-do, well-educated, older managers or executives. Cigar smokers are more likely to associate athleticism with cigar smoking than are nonsmokers, which may be due in part to media imagery of sports figures smoking cigars at a victory celebration.14

Whether cigars deliver nicotine at a level capable of producing dependence is a function of the degree of cigar smoke inhalation, the rate of nicotine absorption, the development of tolerance to nicotine, the age of initiation, and the duration of exposure. The amount of nicotine in a cigar is approximately proportional to the amount of tobacco it contains; this may range from less than 1 g to more than 20 g of tobacco, depending on the cigar size and the amount of tobacco incorporated in its components.17 Thus, the nicotine in the smoke of a single cigar can vary from an amount approximate to that in the smoke of a single cigarette to the amount generated by smoking a pack or more of cigarettes. Cigars are capable of providing high levels of nicotine at a sufficiently rapid rate to produce clear physiological and psychological effects that lead to dependence, even if the smoke is not inhaled.

The manner in which tobacco products are smoked and their ability to deliver nicotine is influenced by the pH of the smoke. Accurate measurement of smoke pH has eluded scientists, and measurements obtained vary depending on the method used. However, if the concept of smoke pH is defined as the pH of the smoke and aerosol particles, it is generally correct to assume that cigar smoke aerosol particles are less acidic relative to cigarette smoke aerosol particles. Furthermore, the alkalinity of cigar smoke aerosol particles relative to cigarette smoke aerosol particles tends to deter inhalation, although cigar smoke is often partially inhaled, especially by current and former cigarette smokers.1 (pp181-193), 7 , 18 Studies indicate that two thirds of those who smoke both cigars and cigarettes (>40% of cigar smokers) inhale cigar smoke, compared with less than 15% of cigar smokers who never smoked cigarettes.1 (pp181-193), 19

Definitive studies of nicotine tolerance and withdrawal have not been conducted on cigar smokers. Some research suggests that cigars produce fewer abstinence-induced withdrawal symptoms than cigarettes, but their nicotine delivery characteristics and the daily patterns of cigar smoking by many persons suggest a distinct potential to produce dependence.1 (pp181-193) The number of cigar smokers in the population who smoke infrequently, who consume few cigars per day, and who inhale minimally suggests that cigar use beginning in adulthood may be less likely to induce dependence than that resulting from cigarette smoking.

Most of what is known about the nature and chemistry of tobacco and tobacco smoke is derived from studies on cigarettes, with little work specifically focused on cigar smoke. Tobacco and tobacco smoke contain about 6700 compounds, of which about 4000 have been identified in tobacco smoke.20 At least 63 of these compounds are known to be carcinogenic, including 11 known human carcinogens.21 The chemistry of cigar smoke is believed to be qualitatively similar to that of cigarettes, except for differences caused by the aging and fermentation of cigar tobacco and by the use of additives (primarily in cigarettes). Quantitative differences are primarily due to differences in the smoke pH and lower oxygen concentrations (resulting from the poor porosity of the tobacco wrappers compared with the paper wrappers of cigarettes).

A class of highly carcinogenic compounds known as tobacco-specific, N-nitrosamines (TSNA) is present in cigar smoke at significantly higher levels than in cigarette smoke.1 (pp55-104) Examination on a "per gram of tobacco smoked" basis reveals that tar, defined as the total particulate matter collected by a Cambridge filter after subtracting moisture and nicotine; carbon monoxide; and ammonia are produced in greater quantities by cigars than cigarettes. When equal doses are applied, the tar produced by cigars exerts greater tumorigenic activity in mice compared with the tar from cigarettes, because cigar tar contains higher concentrations of carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.1 (pp55-104) 22 24

Sidestream smoke (the aerosol emitted from the burning cone of a cigar, cigarette, or pipe during the interval between puffs and the portion of the inhaled smoke that is not retained and is exhaled25 ) contributes significant pollutants to the environment in the form of carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, respirable suspended particulate matter, nicotine, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and other compounds, and sidestream smoke from cigars does so to a greater degree than the sidestream smoke of cigarettes, when equal amounts of tobacco are burned.1 (pp55-104,161-179) Compared with a single cigarette (0.55 g) smoked to 70% of its mass, a large cigar smoked 70% emits about 20 times the carbon monoxide, 5 times the respirable particles, and twice the amount of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon.1 (pp161-179)

One study of environmental pollutants from tobacco smoke found the levels of carbon monoxide at cigar banquets and in some cigar smokers' homes equal to carbon monoxide concentrations on crowded California freeways. The indoor carbon monoxide level measured at a cigar banquet averaged 10 ppm over the 3-hour-20-minute event, and peak levels were comparable to that in a busy parking garage. By comparison, the ambient outdoor carbon monoxide level at rush hour was 1 to 2 ppm.1 (pp161-179), 26 The Environmental Protection Agency's standard for carbon monoxide places the maximum permissible level at an average of 9 ppm over an 8-hour period.27

Mathematical models designed for the analysis and interpretation of indoor air pollution measurements suggest that typical levels of respirable tar particles from cigar smoking in homes, offices, and restaurants may exceed the National Ambient Air Quality Standard for outdoor fine-particle air pollution (65 µg/m3 on a 24-hour average).1 (161-179), 27 Thus, it is clear that cigar smoke can be a major source of indoor air pollution.

Since the 1950s, epidemiologic studies of cigar smokers have found increased risk of oral, esophageal, laryngeal, and lung cancer.1 (105-158), 25 , 28 31 The risks of cancers of the oral cavity and esophagus are similar among cigarette and cigar smokers, probably due to the similar doses of tobacco smoke delivered directly to these areas by cigars and cigarettes.1 (pp105-158) Lung cancer risk is less strongly associated with cigar smoking than with cigarette smoking, but risk increases with the number of cigars smoked per day and depth of inhalation. Men who smoke 3 or more cigars per day and report moderate inhalation experience lung cancer death at about two thirds the rate of men who smoke 1 pack of cigarettes a day.1 (pp105-158) A recent case-control study from Europe (where inhalation patterns and tobacco composition in cigars may differ from those in the United States) found a relative risk (RR) of 9.0 (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.8-14.1) for lung cancer among European cigar and cigarillo smokers,32 substantially higher than the lung cancer risk in older studies of US cigar smokers.1

Additional estimates of the risk of cancer in cigar smokers come from an analysis of data from the Cancer Prevention Study 1 (CPS-1) of the American Cancer Society, a cohort study conducted between 1959 and 1972.1 (pp105-158) Of the 442,455 white male subjects in CPS-I, 15,191 were primary cigar smokers and had never smoked cigarettes, 7404 were secondary cigar smokers and had previously smoked cigarettes, 10,300 were mixed smokers and currently smoking both cigars and cigarettes; and 175,000 were cigarette-only smokers. The cancer risks for these groups were compared with rates for 92,300 men who never smoked based on mortality information. The analysis included consideration of a dose-response effect for all groups related to numbers of cigars smoked per day and degree of self-reported smoke inhalation.

This study provides strong support for an increased risk in cigar smokers for cancers of the lung, esophagus, larynx, oral cavity, and, probably, pancreas. The increase in risk appears to be roughly proportional to the degree of exposure to the cigar smoke. For example, the death rate from cancers of the oral cavity among male cigar smokers, compared with lifelong nonsmokers, is nearly 8 times higher (RR, 7.92; 95% CI, 5.12-11.69); similarly, the death rate from cancer of the larynx is about 10-fold higher (RR, 10.02; 95% CI, 4.0-20.6). For both of these cancers, a dose-response effect is evident and is related to the frequency of cigars smoked.1 (pp105-158) The death rate from esophageal cancer is 3 to 4 times higher in male cigar smokers than in lifelong male nonsmokers (RR, 3.60; 95% CI, 2.2-5.6). The increase in cancer risk associated with cigar smoking is thus greater in the oropharynx and larynx than in the more distant esophagus. The mucosa of the esophagus is exposed only to tobacco carcinogens that have been dissolved in saliva and swallowed but not to the smoke itself. Similarly, lung cancer risk is higher among cigar smokers who report inhaling the smoke than in those who report not inhaling, and higher among cigar smokers who previously smoked cigarettes than among those who only smoked cigars.1 (pp105-158)

Several older studies suggested that cigar smoking increases the risk for coronary heart disease (CHD), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and aortic aneurysm, particularly among heavy cigar smokers (≥3 cigars a day) and those who inhale smoke deeply,31 but there was no clear consensus that cigar smoking causes CHD. The 1983 Surgeon General's Report, which mainly emphasized the hazards of cigarette smoking, concluded that those who smoke only cigars did not appear to experience substantially greater risks than nonsmokers.33 The report notes that the category of nonsmokers also includes passive smokers so that the control group contains persons exposed to environmental tobacco smoke. However, an analysis of CPS-1 data concluded that "cigar smokers who smoke several cigars per day or who inhale [the smoke] are at increased risk for CHD."1 (pp105-158)

A second large cohort study, the Cancer Prevention Study II (CPS-II), was initiated by the American Cancer Society in 1982. A recent analysis of these data examined death rates due to CHD in relation to cigar smoking.34 After excluding men who had ever smoked pipes or cigarettes regularly, approximately 7000 current cigar smokers, 7000 former cigar smokers, and 113,000 men who had never regularly smoked tobacco remained in the analysis. As with cigarette smoking, the association between cigar smoking and death due to CHD was strongest among younger men and current rather than former smokers. There was no apparent increase in risk for cigar smokers aged 75 years or older or among former cigar smokers. Among men younger than 75 years, current cigar smokers experienced a death rate from CHD about one third higher than those who never smoked. This relationship held over the range of cigars smoked per day and was not limited to men who reported inhaling cigar smoke (although unintentional inhalation obviously occurs).

Fewer federal and state regulations pertain to cigars than to cigarettes or smokeless tobacco.35 Cigars are not included in many of the federal and state policies involving health warnings on tobacco, prohibition of sales to minors, and taxation. However, a recent Federal Trade Commission report to Congress recommended health warnings on all labeling and advertising for cigar products; prohibition on electronic advertising such as radio and television for all tobacco products, including all sizes and types of cigars; and consistency in regulating youth access to tobacco products, including cigars.3

Evidence of the health hazards and an alarming increase in rates of cigar smoking underscore the pressing need for cigars to be included in a coherent national policy on tobacco use and dependence. The research on the heavy impact of secondhand cigar smoke on indoor air pollution is particularly relevant for restricting smoking in restaurants and other public places. Although smoking is usually considered an adult problem, tobacco use by children and adolescents is of a particular concern. In addition to research showing high levels of adolescent cigar use, evidence is emerging that young persons use cigars to mask illicit substance abuse.9 The serious health risks associated with tobacco use, including cigars, highlights the need for a broad and inclusive national policy that addresses the constellation of tobacco products and their use by all age groups.

The available scientific knowledge on the health risks of cigar smoking is more than sufficient to conclude that cigar smoking is a cause of cancer and a serious risk to the public health. The increase in cigar smoking has particular implications for both research and policy development. First, rates of cigar smoking are increasing, and not just among adults. Both male and female adolescents are using cigars, and their rates of use have met or exceeded those of adults before 1993. Second, similar to other tobacco products, cigars contain nicotine, which is highly addictive; smoking cigars instead of cigarettes does not reduce the risk of becoming addicted to nicotine. Third, as the number of cigars smoked and the amount of smoke inhaled increases, the risks of death related to cigar smoking approach those of cigarette smokers. Switching to cigars from cigarettes does not necessarily reduce the risk of death from a tobacco-caused illness. Fourth, cigar smoking does not just affect cigar smokers: environmental cigar smoke contains high concentrations of toxic and carcinogenic compounds and can be a major contributor to indoor air pollution, in amounts greater than that produced from cigarettes. Most importantly, cigar smoking is known to cause cancer of the lung and upper aerodigestive tract.

The weight of the evidence indicates that smoking cigars is not a safe alternative to cigarette smoking. The recent increase in rates of cigar smoking and its risks to health underscore the pressing need for a comprehensive national tobacco policy and for active patient educational efforts (Table 2). Laws and regulations limiting the marketing of cigarettes and access to cigarettes by minors should be applied to all tobacco products.

Table Grahic Jump LocationTable 2. Implication for Patient Counseling

A number of avenues for research to define further the health risks exists. Such research could include efforts to understand better the nature of tobacco addiction associated with cigar smoking; the identification of biomarkers of the uptake of carcinogens, carbon monoxide, and nicotine in active cigar smokers; and the relationship of atmospheric nicotine to body fluid cotinine in nonsmokers exposed to environmental cigar smoke. Research is necessary to establish clearly the risks of cigar smoking associated with CHD, cancers, and pulmonary disease. Future studies should focus on morbidity in susceptible groups, including younger cigar smokers; give attention to the type, size, and pattern of use of cigars; examine intermediate markers of morbidity and mortality; and address the temporal relationships between cigar smoking and the development of disease.

National Cancer Institute.  Cigars: Health Effects and TrendsBethesda, Md: US Dept of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service. Smoking and Tobacco Control Monograph No. 9. NIH publication 98-4302. Available at: http://rex.nci.nih.gov/NCI_MONOGRAPHS/MONO9.HTM. Accessibility verified July 7, 2000.
Not Available.  Not Available IRC §5702 (1986).
Federal Trade Commission.  Report to Congress: cigar sales and advertising and promotional expenditures for calendar years 1996 and 1997. July 1999. Available at: http://www.ftc.gov/os/1999/9907/cigarreport1999.htm. Accessed August 8, 1999.
US Department of Agriculture.  Tobacco Situation and Outlook ReportWashington, DC: US Dept of Agriculture, Commodity Economics Division, Economic Research Service; 1998. Publication TBS-241.
Pierce JP, Gilpin EA, Farkas AJ.  et al.  Tobacco Control in California: Who's Winning the War? An Evaluation of the Tobacco Control Program, 1989-1996. La Jolla: University of California, San Diego; 1998.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.  Tobacco use among high school students.  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep.1998;47:229-233.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.  Cigar smoking among teenagers—United States, Massachusetts, and New York, 1996.  JAMA.1997;278:17-19.
US Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Office of Applied Studies.  Summary of Findings from the 1998 National Household Survey on Drug AbuseRockville, Md: US Dept of Health and Human Services; 1999.
US Dept of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General.  Youth Use of Cigars: Patterns of Use and Perceptions of RiskWashington, DC: US Dept of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General; February 1999.
Hamilton K. Blowing smoke.  Newsweek.July 21, 1997:54-56.
Trillin C. All puffed up.  Time.July 15, 1996:18.
Altman DG, Jackson C. Adolescent tobacco use and the social context. In: Shumaker SA, Schron EB, Ockene JK, McBee WL, eds. The Handbook of Health Behavior Change. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Co; 1998:305-329.
US Dept of Health and Human Services.  The Health Consequences of Using Smokeless Tobacco: A Report of the Advisory Committee to the Surgeon GeneralWashington, DC: US Dept of Health and Human Services; 1986. NIH publication 86-2874.
Baker F, Dye JT, Ainsworth SR, Denniston M. Risk perception and cigar smoking behavior. Presented at: American Cancer Society's Cigar Smoking Health Risks: State-of-the-Science Conference; June 15, 1998; Washington, DC.
Strecher VJ, Kreuter MW, Kobrin SC. Do cigarette smokers have unrealistic perceptions of their heart attack, cancer, and stroke risks?  J Behav Med.1995;18:45-54.
Weinstein ND. Unrealistic optimism about susceptibility to health problems: conclusions from a community-wide sample.  J Behav Med.1987;10:481-500.
Henningfield JE, Fant RV, Radvius A, Frost S. Nicotine concentration, smoke pH, and whole tobacco aqueous pH of some cigar brands and types popular in the United States.  Nicotine Tobacco Res.1999;1:163-181.
Wald NJ, Watt HC. Prospective study of effect of switching from cigarettes to pipes or cigars on mortality from three smoking-related diseases.  BMJ.1997;314:1860-1863.
Gilpin EA, Pierce JP. Cigar smoking in California: 1990-1996.  Am J Prev Med.1999;16:195-201.
Green CR, Rodgman A. The tobacco chemists' research conference: a half-century forum for advances in analytical methodology of tobacco and its products.  Recent Advan Tobacco Sci.1996;22:131-304.
Hoffmann D, Hoffmann I, Wynder EL. The changing cigarette, 1950-1997: facts and expectations: report of Canada's Expert Committee on Cigarette Toxicity Reduction. In: Conference Proceedings and Invited Papers; September 20-22, 1998; Toronto, Ontario. Paper No. 2.
Croninger AB, Graham EA, Wynder EL. Experimental production of carcinoma with tobacco products, V: carcinoma induction in mice with cigar, pipe, and all-tobacco cigarette tar.  Cancer Res.1958;18:1263-1271.
Kensler CJ. The pharmacology of tobacco smoke: effect of chronic exposure. In: James G, Rosenthal T, eds. Tobacco and Health. Springfield, Ill: Charles C Thomas Publishers; 1962:5-20.
Homburger F, Treger A, Baker JR. Mouse skin painting with smoke condensates made of pipe, cigar, and cigarette tobaccos.  J Natl Cancer Inst.1963;31:1445-1459.
US Department of Health and Human Services.  Smoking and Health: Other Forms of Tobacco UseWashington, DC: US Dept of Health and Human Services; 1979. DHHS publication PHS 79-500066.
Klepeis NE, Ott WR, Repace JL. The effect of cigar smoking on indoor levels of carbon monoxide and particles.  J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol.1999;9:622-635.
Not Available.  Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air and Radiation Clean Air Act Web site. Available at: http://www.epa.gov/airs/criteria.html. Accessed May 31, 2000.
Wynder EL, Graham EA. Tobacco smoking as a possible etiologic factor in bronchiogenic carcinoma: a study of six hundred and eighty-four approved cases.  JAMA.1950;143:329-336.
Levin ML, Goldstein H, Gerhardt PR. Cancer and tobacco smoking: a preliminary report.  JAMA.1950;143:336-338.
Zaridze D, Peto R. Tobacco: a major international health hazard. In: Proceedings of an International Meeting Organized by the International Agency for Research on Cancer and Co-Sponsored by the All-Union Cancer Research Centre of the Academy of Medical Sciences of the USSR; June 4-16, 1986. IARC 74.
Iribarren C, Tekawa IS, Sidney S, Friedman GD. Effect of cigar smoking on the risk of cardiovascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and cancer in men.  N Engl J Med.1999;340:1773-1780.
Boffetta P, Pershagen G, Joeckel KH.  et al.  Cigar and pipe smoking and lung cancer risk: a multi-center study from Europe.  J Natl Cancer Inst.1999;91:697-701.
US Surgeon General.  The Health Consequences of Smoking: Cardiovascular DiseaseRockville, Md: US Dept of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service Office on Smoking and Health; 1983.
Jacobs EJ, Thun MJ, Apicella LF. Cigar smoking and death from coronary heart disease in a prospective study of United States men.  Arch Intern Med.1999;159:2413-2418.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.  State tobacco control highlights, 1996. Atlanta, Ga: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 1996. CDC publication 099-4895.

First Page Preview

First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

Table Grahic Jump LocationTable 1. Cigar Types and Characteristics*
Table Grahic Jump LocationTable 2. Implication for Patient Counseling

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

National Cancer Institute.  Cigars: Health Effects and TrendsBethesda, Md: US Dept of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service. Smoking and Tobacco Control Monograph No. 9. NIH publication 98-4302. Available at: http://rex.nci.nih.gov/NCI_MONOGRAPHS/MONO9.HTM. Accessibility verified July 7, 2000.
Not Available.  Not Available IRC §5702 (1986).
Federal Trade Commission.  Report to Congress: cigar sales and advertising and promotional expenditures for calendar years 1996 and 1997. July 1999. Available at: http://www.ftc.gov/os/1999/9907/cigarreport1999.htm. Accessed August 8, 1999.
US Department of Agriculture.  Tobacco Situation and Outlook ReportWashington, DC: US Dept of Agriculture, Commodity Economics Division, Economic Research Service; 1998. Publication TBS-241.
Pierce JP, Gilpin EA, Farkas AJ.  et al.  Tobacco Control in California: Who's Winning the War? An Evaluation of the Tobacco Control Program, 1989-1996. La Jolla: University of California, San Diego; 1998.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.  Tobacco use among high school students.  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep.1998;47:229-233.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.  Cigar smoking among teenagers—United States, Massachusetts, and New York, 1996.  JAMA.1997;278:17-19.
US Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Office of Applied Studies.  Summary of Findings from the 1998 National Household Survey on Drug AbuseRockville, Md: US Dept of Health and Human Services; 1999.
US Dept of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General.  Youth Use of Cigars: Patterns of Use and Perceptions of RiskWashington, DC: US Dept of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General; February 1999.
Hamilton K. Blowing smoke.  Newsweek.July 21, 1997:54-56.
Trillin C. All puffed up.  Time.July 15, 1996:18.
Altman DG, Jackson C. Adolescent tobacco use and the social context. In: Shumaker SA, Schron EB, Ockene JK, McBee WL, eds. The Handbook of Health Behavior Change. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Co; 1998:305-329.
US Dept of Health and Human Services.  The Health Consequences of Using Smokeless Tobacco: A Report of the Advisory Committee to the Surgeon GeneralWashington, DC: US Dept of Health and Human Services; 1986. NIH publication 86-2874.
Baker F, Dye JT, Ainsworth SR, Denniston M. Risk perception and cigar smoking behavior. Presented at: American Cancer Society's Cigar Smoking Health Risks: State-of-the-Science Conference; June 15, 1998; Washington, DC.
Strecher VJ, Kreuter MW, Kobrin SC. Do cigarette smokers have unrealistic perceptions of their heart attack, cancer, and stroke risks?  J Behav Med.1995;18:45-54.
Weinstein ND. Unrealistic optimism about susceptibility to health problems: conclusions from a community-wide sample.  J Behav Med.1987;10:481-500.
Henningfield JE, Fant RV, Radvius A, Frost S. Nicotine concentration, smoke pH, and whole tobacco aqueous pH of some cigar brands and types popular in the United States.  Nicotine Tobacco Res.1999;1:163-181.
Wald NJ, Watt HC. Prospective study of effect of switching from cigarettes to pipes or cigars on mortality from three smoking-related diseases.  BMJ.1997;314:1860-1863.
Gilpin EA, Pierce JP. Cigar smoking in California: 1990-1996.  Am J Prev Med.1999;16:195-201.
Green CR, Rodgman A. The tobacco chemists' research conference: a half-century forum for advances in analytical methodology of tobacco and its products.  Recent Advan Tobacco Sci.1996;22:131-304.
Hoffmann D, Hoffmann I, Wynder EL. The changing cigarette, 1950-1997: facts and expectations: report of Canada's Expert Committee on Cigarette Toxicity Reduction. In: Conference Proceedings and Invited Papers; September 20-22, 1998; Toronto, Ontario. Paper No. 2.
Croninger AB, Graham EA, Wynder EL. Experimental production of carcinoma with tobacco products, V: carcinoma induction in mice with cigar, pipe, and all-tobacco cigarette tar.  Cancer Res.1958;18:1263-1271.
Kensler CJ. The pharmacology of tobacco smoke: effect of chronic exposure. In: James G, Rosenthal T, eds. Tobacco and Health. Springfield, Ill: Charles C Thomas Publishers; 1962:5-20.
Homburger F, Treger A, Baker JR. Mouse skin painting with smoke condensates made of pipe, cigar, and cigarette tobaccos.  J Natl Cancer Inst.1963;31:1445-1459.
US Department of Health and Human Services.  Smoking and Health: Other Forms of Tobacco UseWashington, DC: US Dept of Health and Human Services; 1979. DHHS publication PHS 79-500066.
Klepeis NE, Ott WR, Repace JL. The effect of cigar smoking on indoor levels of carbon monoxide and particles.  J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol.1999;9:622-635.
Not Available.  Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air and Radiation Clean Air Act Web site. Available at: http://www.epa.gov/airs/criteria.html. Accessed May 31, 2000.
Wynder EL, Graham EA. Tobacco smoking as a possible etiologic factor in bronchiogenic carcinoma: a study of six hundred and eighty-four approved cases.  JAMA.1950;143:329-336.
Levin ML, Goldstein H, Gerhardt PR. Cancer and tobacco smoking: a preliminary report.  JAMA.1950;143:336-338.
Zaridze D, Peto R. Tobacco: a major international health hazard. In: Proceedings of an International Meeting Organized by the International Agency for Research on Cancer and Co-Sponsored by the All-Union Cancer Research Centre of the Academy of Medical Sciences of the USSR; June 4-16, 1986. IARC 74.
Iribarren C, Tekawa IS, Sidney S, Friedman GD. Effect of cigar smoking on the risk of cardiovascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and cancer in men.  N Engl J Med.1999;340:1773-1780.
Boffetta P, Pershagen G, Joeckel KH.  et al.  Cigar and pipe smoking and lung cancer risk: a multi-center study from Europe.  J Natl Cancer Inst.1999;91:697-701.
US Surgeon General.  The Health Consequences of Smoking: Cardiovascular DiseaseRockville, Md: US Dept of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service Office on Smoking and Health; 1983.
Jacobs EJ, Thun MJ, Apicella LF. Cigar smoking and death from coronary heart disease in a prospective study of United States men.  Arch Intern Med.1999;159:2413-2418.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.  State tobacco control highlights, 1996. Atlanta, Ga: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 1996. CDC publication 099-4895.
CME Course for:


You need to register in order to view this quiz.


To understand the clinical management of acute heart failure syndromes.
Accreditation Information The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
To view and print your certificate and access a summary of your CME courses go to My CME.
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s “Cited By” API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Response

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics
PubMed Articles
JAMAevidence.com