0
ARTICLE |

Withholding Research Results in Academic Life Science: Title and subTitle BreakEvidence From a National Survey of Faculty FREE

David Blumenthal, MD, MPP; Eric G. Campbell, PhD; Melissa S. Anderson, PhD; Nancyanne Causino, EdD; Karen Seashore Louis, PhD
[+] Author Affiliations

Reprints: David Blumenthal, MD, MPP, Health Policy Research and Development Unit, 50 Staniford St, Boston, MA 02114.


JAMA. 1997;277(15):1224-1228. doi:10.1001/jama.1997.03540390054035
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Objectives.  —To identify the prevalence and determinants of data-withholding behaviors among academic life scientists.

Design.  —Mailed survey of 3394 life science faculty in the 50 universities that received the most funding from the National Institutes of Health in 1993.

Participants.  —A total of 2167 faculty responded to the survey, a 64% response rate.

Outcome Measures.  —Whether respondents delayed publication of their research results for more than 6 months and whether respondents refused to share research results with other university scientists in the last 3 years.

Results.  —A total of 410 respondents (19.8%) reported that publication of their research results had been delayed by more than 6 months at least once in the last 3 years to allow for patent application, to protect their scientific lead, to slow the dissemination of undesired results, to allow time to negotiate a patent, or to resolve disputes over the ownership of intellectual property. Also, 181 respondents (8.9%) reported refusing to share research results with other university scientists in the last 3 years. In multivariate analysis, participation in an academic-industry research relationship and engagement in the commercialization of university research were significantly associated with delays in publication. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (Cls) were 1.34 (1.07-1.59) and 3.15 (2.88-3.41), respectively. Variables associated with refusing to share results were conducting research similar to the Human Genome Project (OR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.75-2.42), publication rate (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.03), and engagement in commercialization of research (OR, 2.45; 95% CI, 2.08-2.82).

Conclusions.  —Withholding of research results is not a widespread phenomenon among life-science researchers. However, withholding is more common among the most productive and entrepreneurial faculty. These results also suggest that data withholding has affected a significant number of life-science faculty and further study on data-withholding practices is suggested.

REFERENCES

Merton RA. The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigation . Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press; 1973;.
Rosenberg SA.  Secrecy in medical research . N Engl J Med . 1996;;334:292-294.
Cohen J.  Share and share alike isn't always the rule in science . Science . 1995;;268:1715-1718.
National Institutes of Health.  Developing sponsored research agreements: considerations for recipients of NIH research grants and contracts . Federal Register . 1994;;59:55674-55678.
Blumenthal D, Causino N, Campbell EG, Louis KS.  Relationships between academic institutions and industry: an industry survey . N Engl J Med . 1996;;334:368-373.
Blumenthal D, Campbell EG, Causino N, Louis KS.  Participation of life science faculty in research relationships with industry: extent and effects . N Engl J Med . 1996;;335:1734-1739.
Weinberg RA.  Reflections on the current state of data and reagent exchange among biomedical researchers . In: Panel on Scientific Responsibility and the Conduct of Research, Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy. Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process, II . Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1993;:66-78.
King RT.  Bitter pill: how a drug firm paid for university study, then undermined it . Wall Street Journal . (April 25) , 1996;:A1.
Peterson's Guide to Graduate Programs in the Biological and Agricultural Sciences. Princeton, NJ: Peterson's Guide; 1994.
Louis KS, Blumenthal D, Gluck ME, Stoto MA.  Entrepreneurs in academe: an exploration of behaviors among life scientists . Admin Sci Q . 1989;; 34:110-131.
Blumenthal D, Gluck M, Louis KS, Wise D.  Industrial support of university research relationships in biotechnology: implications for the university . Science . 1986;;232:1361-1366.
Statement Before the House Small Business Subcommittee on Regulation, Business Opportunities and Energy, 103rd Cong, 1st Sess (1993) (testimony of Bernadine Healy, MD, director of the National Institutes of Health).

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

Merton RA. The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigation . Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press; 1973;.
Rosenberg SA.  Secrecy in medical research . N Engl J Med . 1996;;334:292-294.
Cohen J.  Share and share alike isn't always the rule in science . Science . 1995;;268:1715-1718.
National Institutes of Health.  Developing sponsored research agreements: considerations for recipients of NIH research grants and contracts . Federal Register . 1994;;59:55674-55678.
Blumenthal D, Causino N, Campbell EG, Louis KS.  Relationships between academic institutions and industry: an industry survey . N Engl J Med . 1996;;334:368-373.
Blumenthal D, Campbell EG, Causino N, Louis KS.  Participation of life science faculty in research relationships with industry: extent and effects . N Engl J Med . 1996;;335:1734-1739.
Weinberg RA.  Reflections on the current state of data and reagent exchange among biomedical researchers . In: Panel on Scientific Responsibility and the Conduct of Research, Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy. Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process, II . Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1993;:66-78.
King RT.  Bitter pill: how a drug firm paid for university study, then undermined it . Wall Street Journal . (April 25) , 1996;:A1.
Peterson's Guide to Graduate Programs in the Biological and Agricultural Sciences. Princeton, NJ: Peterson's Guide; 1994.
Louis KS, Blumenthal D, Gluck ME, Stoto MA.  Entrepreneurs in academe: an exploration of behaviors among life scientists . Admin Sci Q . 1989;; 34:110-131.
Blumenthal D, Gluck M, Louis KS, Wise D.  Industrial support of university research relationships in biotechnology: implications for the university . Science . 1986;;232:1361-1366.
Statement Before the House Small Business Subcommittee on Regulation, Business Opportunities and Energy, 103rd Cong, 1st Sess (1993) (testimony of Bernadine Healy, MD, director of the National Institutes of Health).
CME Course for:


You need to register in order to view this quiz.


To understand the clinical management of acute heart failure syndromes.
Accreditation Information The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
To view and print your certificate and access a summary of your CME courses go to My CME.
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s “Cited By” API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Response

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.