0
ARTICLE |

Circumcision in the United States: Title and subTitle BreakPrevalence, Prophylactic Effects, and Sexual Practice FREE

Edward O. Laumann, PhD; Christopher M. Masi, MD; Ezra W. Zuckerman, MA
[+] Author Affiliations

Reprints: Edward O. Laumann, PhD, Department of Sociology, University of Chicago, 5848 S University Ave, Chicago, IL 60637 (e-mail: eddie@cicero.spc.uchicago.edu)


JAMA. 1997;277(13):1052-1057. doi:10.1001/jama.1997.03540370042034
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Objective.  —To assess the prevalence of circumcision across various social groups and examine the health and sexual outcomes of circumcision.

Design.  —An analysis of data from the National Health and Social Life Survey.

Participants.  —A national probability sample of 1410 American men aged 18 to 59 years at the time of the survey. In addition, an oversample of black and Hispanic minority groups is included in comparative analyses.

Main Outcome Measures.  —The contraction of sexually transmitted diseases, the experience of sexual dysfunction, and experience with a series of sexual practices.

Results.  —We find no significant differences between circumcised and uncircumcised men in their likelihood of contracting sexually transmitted diseases. However, uncircumcised men appear slightly more likely to experience sexual dysfunctions, especially later in life. Finally, we find that circumcised men engage in a more elaborated set of sexual practices. This pattern differs across ethnic groups, suggesting the influence of social factors.

Conclusions.  —The National Health and Social Life Survey evidence indicates a slight benefit of circumcision but a negligible association with most outcomes. These findings inform existing debates on the utility of circumcision. The considerable impact of circumcision status on sexual practice represents a new finding that should further enrich such discussion. Our results support the view that physicians and parents be informed of the potential benefits and risks before circumcising newborns.

REFERENCES

Wiswell T, Smith FR, Bass JW.  Decreased incidence of urinary tract infections in circumcised male infants . Pediatrics . 1985;;75:901-903.
Herzog L.  Urinary tract infections and circumcision: a case control study . Am J Dis Child . 1989;;143:348-350.
Parker S, Stewart AJ, Wren MN, et al.  Cricumcision and sexually transmissible disease . Med J Aust . 1983;;2:288-290.
Task Force on Circumcision.  Report of the task force on circumcision . Pediatrics . 1989;;84:388-391.
Committee on Fetus and Newborn.  Report of the ad hoc task force on circumcision . Pediatrics . 1975;;56:610-611.
Masi CM. Circumcision: The Medical Issues . Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago School of Social Services Administration; 1995;. Working paper.
Morgan W.  Penile plunder . Med J Aust . 1967;;1:1102-1103.
Burger R, Guthrie T.  Why circumcision? Pediatrics . 1974;;54:362.
Masters W, Johnson V. Human Sexual Response . Boston, Mass: Little Brown & Co; 1966;.
Preston EN.  Whither the foreskin? a consideration of routine neonatal circumcision . JAMA . 1970;;213:1853-1858.
Cleary T, Kohl S.  Overwhelming infection with group B beta-hemolytic streptococcus associated with circumcision . Pediatrics . 1979;;64:301-303.
Goodwin W.  Uncircumcision: a technique for plastic reconstruction of a prepuce after circumcision . J Urol . 1990;;144:1203-1205.
Laumann EO, Michael RT, Gagnon JH, et al. The Social Organization of Sexuality: Sexual Practices in the United States . Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press; 1994;: chapt 2 , appendixes A, B.
Stata Corporation. STATA Version 4.0. College Station, Tex: Stata Corp; 1994.
Brown MS, Brown CA.  Circumcision decision: prominence of social concerns . Pediatrics . 1987;;80:215-219.
Graves EJ.  Detailed diagnoses and procedures: National Hospital Discharge Survey, 1993, from the National Center for Health Statistics . Vital Health Stat 13 . 1995;;122:128.
Lilienfeld AM, Graham S.  Validity of determining circumcision status by questionnaire as related to epidemiological studies of cancer of the cervix . J Natl Cancer Inst . 1958;;21:713-720.
Schlossberger NM, Turner RA, Irwin CE Jr.  Early adolescent knowledge and attitudes about circumcision: methods and implications for research . J Adolesc Health . 1991;;12:293-297.

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

Wiswell T, Smith FR, Bass JW.  Decreased incidence of urinary tract infections in circumcised male infants . Pediatrics . 1985;;75:901-903.
Herzog L.  Urinary tract infections and circumcision: a case control study . Am J Dis Child . 1989;;143:348-350.
Parker S, Stewart AJ, Wren MN, et al.  Cricumcision and sexually transmissible disease . Med J Aust . 1983;;2:288-290.
Task Force on Circumcision.  Report of the task force on circumcision . Pediatrics . 1989;;84:388-391.
Committee on Fetus and Newborn.  Report of the ad hoc task force on circumcision . Pediatrics . 1975;;56:610-611.
Masi CM. Circumcision: The Medical Issues . Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago School of Social Services Administration; 1995;. Working paper.
Morgan W.  Penile plunder . Med J Aust . 1967;;1:1102-1103.
Burger R, Guthrie T.  Why circumcision? Pediatrics . 1974;;54:362.
Masters W, Johnson V. Human Sexual Response . Boston, Mass: Little Brown & Co; 1966;.
Preston EN.  Whither the foreskin? a consideration of routine neonatal circumcision . JAMA . 1970;;213:1853-1858.
Cleary T, Kohl S.  Overwhelming infection with group B beta-hemolytic streptococcus associated with circumcision . Pediatrics . 1979;;64:301-303.
Goodwin W.  Uncircumcision: a technique for plastic reconstruction of a prepuce after circumcision . J Urol . 1990;;144:1203-1205.
Laumann EO, Michael RT, Gagnon JH, et al. The Social Organization of Sexuality: Sexual Practices in the United States . Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press; 1994;: chapt 2 , appendixes A, B.
Stata Corporation. STATA Version 4.0. College Station, Tex: Stata Corp; 1994.
Brown MS, Brown CA.  Circumcision decision: prominence of social concerns . Pediatrics . 1987;;80:215-219.
Graves EJ.  Detailed diagnoses and procedures: National Hospital Discharge Survey, 1993, from the National Center for Health Statistics . Vital Health Stat 13 . 1995;;122:128.
Lilienfeld AM, Graham S.  Validity of determining circumcision status by questionnaire as related to epidemiological studies of cancer of the cervix . J Natl Cancer Inst . 1958;;21:713-720.
Schlossberger NM, Turner RA, Irwin CE Jr.  Early adolescent knowledge and attitudes about circumcision: methods and implications for research . J Adolesc Health . 1991;;12:293-297.
CME Course for:


You need to register in order to view this quiz.


To understand the clinical management of acute heart failure syndromes.
Accreditation Information The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
To view and print your certificate and access a summary of your CME courses go to My CME.
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s “Cited By” API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Response

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.