0
ARTICLE |

Peer Review in Prague: Title and subTitle BreakThe International Congress on Biomedical Peer Review and Global Communications, 1997 FREE

Drummond Rennie, MD; Annette Flanagin, RN, MA
[+] Author Affiliations

Dr Rennie is Deputy Editor (West) of JAMA, and Ms Flanagin is Associate Senior Editor.

Reprint requests to JAMA, 515 N State St, Chicago, IL 60610 (Ms Flanagin).


JAMA. 1995;274(12):986-987. doi:10.1001/jama.1995.03530120078046
Text Size: A A A
Published online

When science operates well, the publication of research occurs after expert criticism and revision and is itself followed by unrestrained criticism from the scientists' peers: the readers. The existence of a rigorous peer review system is the best sign that science is functioning in an appropriate and nurturing environment. Recognizing the central position of editorial peer review in the scientific process, we at JAMA announced in 1986 that we intended to host a conference in 3 years at which the results of research into editorial peer review would be presented and discussed.1 We received an enthusiastic response, and in 1989 the First Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication was held in Chicago, under the auspices of the American Medical Association. Manuscripts developed from the research presentations were published in 1990.2 In 1993 we held another conference in Chicago, receiving twice as many abstracts from which to choose

REFERENCES

Rennie D.  Guarding the guardians: a conference on editorial peer reviw. JAMA . 1986;;256:2391-2392.
 Guarding the Guardians: Research on Editorial Peer Review. JAMA . (March 9) , 1990;;263(theme issue):1309-1456.
Rennie D, Flanagin A.  The Second International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication. JAMA 1994;;272:91.
 The Second International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication. JAMA . (July 13) , 1994;;272(theme issue):91-173.
Rennie D.  More peering into editorial peer review. JAMA . 1993;;270:2856-2858.
Kassirer JP, Campion EW.  Peer review: crude and understudied, but indispensible. JAMA . 1994;;272:96-97.
Rennie D.  Problems in peer review and fraud: cleave ever to the sunnier side of doubt.  In 'Balancing Act': Essays to Honour Stephen Lock . London, England: The Keynes Press; 1991;.
Bailar JC.  Reliability, fairness, objectivity and other inappropriate goals of peer review. Behav Brain Sci . 1991;;14:137-138.
Smith R.  Promoting research into peer review. BMJ . 1994;;309:143-144.
Gibbs WW.  Lost science in the Third World. Sci Am . 1995;;273:92-99.
Winograd S, Zare RN.  'Wired' science or whither the printed page. Science . 1995;; 269:615.
Goldwein JW, Benjamin I.  Internet-based medical information: time to take charge. Ann Intern Med . 1995;;123:152-153.
LaPorte RE, Marler E, Akazawa S, et al.  The death of biomedical journals. BMJ . 1995;;310:387-390.
Cotton P.  Flaws documented, reforms debated at congress on journal peer review. JAMA . 1993;;270:2775-2778.
Vanchieri C.  Peer review put to the test: credibility at stake. J Natl Cancer Inst . 1993;;85:1632.
McCarthy P.  Critics sharpen assault on peer review. Scientist . (May 30) , 1994;;8:1.
 Launch of the World Association of Medical Editors. JAMA . 1995;;273:981. Medical News & Perspectives.

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

Rennie D.  Guarding the guardians: a conference on editorial peer reviw. JAMA . 1986;;256:2391-2392.
 Guarding the Guardians: Research on Editorial Peer Review. JAMA . (March 9) , 1990;;263(theme issue):1309-1456.
Rennie D, Flanagin A.  The Second International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication. JAMA 1994;;272:91.
 The Second International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication. JAMA . (July 13) , 1994;;272(theme issue):91-173.
Rennie D.  More peering into editorial peer review. JAMA . 1993;;270:2856-2858.
Kassirer JP, Campion EW.  Peer review: crude and understudied, but indispensible. JAMA . 1994;;272:96-97.
Rennie D.  Problems in peer review and fraud: cleave ever to the sunnier side of doubt.  In 'Balancing Act': Essays to Honour Stephen Lock . London, England: The Keynes Press; 1991;.
Bailar JC.  Reliability, fairness, objectivity and other inappropriate goals of peer review. Behav Brain Sci . 1991;;14:137-138.
Smith R.  Promoting research into peer review. BMJ . 1994;;309:143-144.
Gibbs WW.  Lost science in the Third World. Sci Am . 1995;;273:92-99.
Winograd S, Zare RN.  'Wired' science or whither the printed page. Science . 1995;; 269:615.
Goldwein JW, Benjamin I.  Internet-based medical information: time to take charge. Ann Intern Med . 1995;;123:152-153.
LaPorte RE, Marler E, Akazawa S, et al.  The death of biomedical journals. BMJ . 1995;;310:387-390.
Cotton P.  Flaws documented, reforms debated at congress on journal peer review. JAMA . 1993;;270:2775-2778.
Vanchieri C.  Peer review put to the test: credibility at stake. J Natl Cancer Inst . 1993;;85:1632.
McCarthy P.  Critics sharpen assault on peer review. Scientist . (May 30) , 1994;;8:1.
 Launch of the World Association of Medical Editors. JAMA . 1995;;273:981. Medical News & Perspectives.
CME Course for:


You need to register in order to view this quiz.


To understand the clinical management of acute heart failure syndromes.
Accreditation Information The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
To view and print your certificate and access a summary of your CME courses go to My CME.
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s “Cited By” API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Response

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.