Factors Affecting the Waiting Time of Cadaveric Kidney Transplant Candidates in the United States FREE

Fred P. Sanfilippo, MD, PhD; William K. Vaughn, PhD; Thomas G. Peters, MD; Charles F. Shield, III, MD; Patricia L. Adams, MD; Marc I. Lorber, MD; G. Melville Williams, MD

[+] Author Affiliations

Reprint requests to United Network for Organ Sharing, PO Box 13770, Richmond, VA 23225-8770.

JAMA. 1992;267(2):247-252. doi:10.1001/jama.1992.03480020057031

Text Size: A A A

Published online

Article

References

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT | REFERENCES

Objective. —To evaluate the relative impact of various factors that could account for differences in waiting time of cadaveric kidney transplant candidates (eg, black and sensitized patients).

Design. —A cohort study using multivariate analyses to identify associations between 36 patient, donor, and center factors with waiting time for all US cadaveric kidney transplant candidates listed between October 1, 1987, and June 30, 1990.

Setting. —All US kidney transplant centers.

Patients. —The study included 23468 cadaveric renal transplant candidates on active waiting status.

Results. —The patient characteristics most significantly associated with increased waiting time (adjusted for all other variables) were immunologic and included presensitization to HLA antigens, O or B blood type, candidacy for a repeat transplantation, and expression of rare HLA-A or HLA-B antigen phenotypes. Nonimmunologic factors also affected waiting times, which were significantly shorter for patients younger than 15 years vs those aged 15 through 44 years (8.4 vs 12.9 months, respectively; P<.0001), for those listed at multiple centers vs one center (7.0 vs 13.3 months, respectively;P<.0001), or for white vs black patients (11.9 vs 15.4 months, respectively;P<.0001). Local transplant center characteristics associated with a significantly shorter waiting time included a small number of transplantation candidates, a high (>35 per million population) local kidney organ recovery rate, and an approved variance from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network allocation algorithm.

Conclusions. —The time renal transplant candidates must wait for kidney transplantation is influenced by several factors in addition to those expected due to immunologic reasons of donor incompatibility, the algorithms used for organ distribution, or the effectiveness of local kidney recovery. The impact of these factors should be considered as the current US system for allocating scarce donor organs for kidney transplantation is modified.(JAMA. 1992;267:247-252)

REFERENCES

ABSTRACT | REFERENCES

Task Force on Organ Transplantation. Organ Transplantation: Issues and Recommendations . Rockville, Md: Health Resources and Services Administration; 1986;.

Pub L No. 98-507. National Organ Transplant Act, 42 USC §273.

Bollinger RR, Sanfilippo FS, Spees BK, Vaughn WK, Hawthorne R. Renal transplantation in highly sensitized patients. Transplant Proc . 1982;;14:46-48.

Sanfilippo F, Goeken N, Niblack G, Scornik J, Vaughn WK. The effect of first cadaver renal transplant HLA-A, -B match on sensitization levels and re-transplantation rates following graft failure. Transplantation . 1987;;43:240-244.

Office of the Inspector General. The Distribution of Organs for Transplantation: Expectations and Practices . Washington, DC: Office of Analysis and Inspections; 1991;. US Dept of Health and Human Services publication OE1-01-89-00550.

Kasiske BL, Neylan JF III, Riggio RR, et al. The effect of race on access and outcome in transplantation. N Engl J Med . 1991;;324:302-307.

Cox DR. Regression models and life-tables. J R Stat Soc B . 1972;;34:187-202.

Patel R, Terasaki PI. Significance of a positive crossmatch test in kidney transplantation. N Engl J Med . 1969;;288:735-739.

Baldwin WM III, Pruitt SK, Sanfilippo F. Alloantibodies: basic and clinical concepts. Transplantation Rev . 1991;;5:100-119.

Sanfilippo F. The influence of HLA and ABO antigens on graft rejection and survival. Clin Lab Med . 1991;;11:537-550.

Sutherland DER, Chow SY, Moudry-Munns KC. International Pancreas Transplant Registry Report, 1988. Clin Transplant . 1989;;3:129-149.

Park MS, Oriol R, Nakata S, Terasaki PI, Ford R, Bernoco D. ABH and Lewis antigens on lymphocytes: screening of pregnant women's sera with the B cell cytotoxicity test. Transplant Proc . 1979;;11:1947-1949.

Kerman RH, Kimball PM, VanBuren CT, et al. Influence of race on crossmatch outcome and recipient eligibility for transplantation. Transplantation . In press.

Shibata A, Hamajima N, Tamakoshi A, Suzuki S, Sasaki R, Aoki K. Dealing with the proportional hazards assumption when using the proportional hazards model with a single independent variable. Jpn J Clin Oncol . 1989;;19:195-201.

Sanfilippo F. The distribution of organs for transplantation: what is fair and practical? N C Med J . 1991;;52:367-369.

Opelz G. The benefit of exchanging donor kidneys among transplant centers. N Engl J Med . 1988;; 318:1289-1292.

Sanfilippo F, Vaughn WK, Alexander JW, LeFor WM, Lucas BA, Pfaff WW. Organ sharing for good HLA-A, -B, and -DR matching improves cadaver renal graft survival in SEOPF. In: Terasaki PI, ed. Clinical Transplants, 1988 . Los Angeles, Calif: UCLA Tissue Typing Laboratory; 1988;:211-223.

Takiff H, Iwaki Y, Cecka M, Terasaki PI. The benefit and underutilization of sharing kidneys for better histocompatibility. Transplantation . 1989;;47:102-105.

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal