Impact of Peer Review in Reduction of Permanent Pacemaker Implantations FREE

Atul B. Chokshi, MD; Howard S. Friedman, MD; Monte Malach, MD; Balendu C. Vasavada, MD; Sheldon J. Bleicher, MD

[+] Author Affiliations

Reprint requests to The Brooklyn Hospital, 121 DeKalb Ave, Brooklyn, NY 11201 (Dr Friedman).

JAMA. 1981;246(7):754-757. doi:10.1001/jama.1981.03320070038021

Text Size: A A A

Published online

Article

References

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT | REFERENCES

Because of a sharp increase in the number of permanent pacemakers inserted at The Brooklyn Hospital between 1972 and 1976, a peer-review committee was established to monitor subsequent pacemaker implantation. Total initial implants declined from 48 to 22 per year in the two years that followed. The number of implantations for sinoatrial bradycardias declined from 50 to 27 and the number of implantations for intraventricular conduction defects declined from 32 to five in the two years after peer review, compared with the two years before. There was no change in the number of pacemakers implanted for complete or advanced heart block. Almost 10% of patients who received a pacemaker between 1972 and 1976 had other conditions that might have accounted for the events that precipitated the decision to implant a pacemaker. The symptoms for which the pacemaker was implanted persisted in 19% of patients, despite a normally functioning pacemaker system. Patients receiving a permanent pacemaker before peer review had a 17% one-year and a 43% three-year mortality. When a more critical patient selection process was instituted, a smaller percentage remained symptomatic (9% vs 19%) and three-year survival rate was improved (86% vs 57%). From 1977 through 1978, when permanent pacemaker implantations declined, the number of hospital, medical service, and coronary care unit admissions increased. It is concluded that peer review can have substantial impact on permanent pacemaker implantations.

(JAMA 1981;246:754-757)

REFERENCES

ABSTRACT | REFERENCES

Chardack WM, Gage AA, Greatbatch W: Correction of complete heart block by a self-contained and subcutaneously implanted pacemaker: Clinical experience with 15 patients . J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1961;;42:814-830.

Damato AN, Lau SH, Helfant R, et al: A study of heart block in man using His bundle recordings . Circulation 1969;;39:297-305.

Chung E: Artificial Cardiac Pacing: A Practical Approach . Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins Co, 1978;, p 1.

Hill AB: A Short Textbook of Medical Statistics , ed 10. Philadelphia, JB Lippincott Co, 1977;, pp 199-213.

Vera Z, Mason DT, Fletcher RD, et al: Prolonged His-Q interval in chronic bifascicular block: Relation to impending complete heart block . Circulation 1976;;53:46-55.

Narula OS, Samet P, Javier RP: Significance of the sinus-node recovery time . Circulation 1972;;65:140-158.

Peters RW, Scheinman MM, Modin G, et al: Prophylactic permanent pacemakers for patients with chronic bundle branch block . Am J Med 1979;;66:978-985.

McAnulty JH, Rahimtoola SH, Murphy ES, et al: A prospect study of sudden death in 'high-risk' bundle-branch block . N Engl J Med 1978;;299:209-215.

Rosen KM, Dhingra RC, Wyndham CR, et al: Significance of H-V interval in 515 patients with chronic bifascicular block , abstracted. Am J Cardiol 1980;;45:405.

Crook B, Kitson D, McCornish M, et al: What is the role of clinical electrophysiology in evaluation of patients with sinoatrial disease ? Br Heart J 1976;;38:879-880.

Gupta PK, Lichstein E, Chadda KD, et al: Appraisal of sinus nodal recovery time in patients with sick sinus syndrome . Am J Cardiol 1974;;34:265-270.

Brodsky M, Wu D, Denes P, et al: Arrhythmias documented by 24-hour continuous electrocardiographic monitoring in 50 male medical students without apparent heart disease . Am J Cardiol 1977;;39:390-395.

Scheinman MM, Straus HC, Evans TG, et al: Adverse effects of sympatholytic agents in patients with hypertension and sinus node dysfunction . Am J Med 1978;;64:1013-1020.

Margolis JR, Straus H, Miller HC, et al: Digitalis and the sick-sinus syndrome: Clinical and electrophysiological documentation of a severe toxic effect on sinus node function . Circulation 1975;;52:162-169.

Strauss HC, Gilbert M, Svenson RH, et al: Electrophysiological effects of propranolol on sinus node function in patients with sinus node dysfunction . Circulation 1976;;54:452-459.

Shaw DB, Holman RR, Gowers JI: Survival in sinoatrial disorder (sick-sinus syndrome) . Br Med J 1980;;1:139-141.

Kaplan BM: Sick sinus syndrome . Arch Intern Med 1978;;138:28.

Kowey PR, DeSilva RA, Lown B: Pacemaker removal after unnecessary implantation: Clinical experience and analysis of cost , abstracted. Clin Res 1979;;27:565.

Gould L, Reddy CRV, Cifarelli MF, et al: Three hundred fifty-three consecutive patients with permanent transvenous pacemakers . PACE 1980;;3:452-455.

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal