0
ARTICLE |

The Auxometric Dimension: Title and subTitle BreakA New Method for Using Rate of Growth in Prognostic Staging of Breast Cancer FREE

Mary E. Charlson, MD; Alvan R. Feinstein, MD
[+] Author Affiliations

Reprint requests to Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT 06510 (Dr. Feinstein).


JAMA. 1974;228(2):180-185. doi:10.1001/jama.1974.03230270024019
Text Size: A A A
Published online

A system of auxometric staging for the clinical growth rate of breast cancer can be created by considering the observed duration of the tumor and the concomitant occurrence of transition events. In an inception cohort of 219 women with histologically confirmed breast cancers that had first been treated at the Yale-New Haven Hospital during the interval 1962 to 1964, the overall five-year survival rate was 63%. Within categories of the three new auxometric stages, the five-year survival rates were as follows: slow, 37/45 (82%); intermediate, 85/133 (64%); and rapid, 15/41 (37%).

These auxometric categories were combined with conventional TNM anatomic categories to form a composite anatomic-auxometric system of four stages, A through D. A particularly striking feature of the new composite system was the demarcation of 22 patients in stage A who had a 100% five-year survival rate, regardless of whether mastectomy was simple or radical. In stages B, C, and D, radical mastectomy appeared superior to simple mastectomy, but the results may have been affected by bias in selecting patients according to prognostic features that are not included in the composite new stages.

The results are pertinent in therapeutic decisions for individual patients, in the design of large-scale therapeutic trials, and in biologic correlation of diverse laboratory research. Because a cancer has biologic function as well as anatomic structure, both the function and the structure require appropriate analytic attention.

The exclusively anatomic categories that form the basis of conventional systems of staging for breast cancer can be complemented, augmented, and improved by suitable consideration of the clinical rate of growth. (JAMA 228:180-185, 1974)

REFERENCES

Feinstein AR:  Clinical biostatistics: XIV. The purposes of prognostic stratification . Clin Pharmacol Ther 13:285-297, 1972;.
Feinstein AR:  Clinical biostatistics: XXIV. The role of randomization in sampling, testing, allocating, and credulous idolatry (conclusion) . Clin Pharmacol Ther , 14:1035-1051, 1973;.
Charlson M, Feinstein AR:  An analytic critique of existing systems of staging for breast cancer . Surgery 73:579-598, 1973;.
Macdonald I:  Mammary carcinoma: A review of 2,636 cases . Surg Gynecol Obstet 74:75-82, 1942;.
Macdonald I:  Biologic predeterminism in human cancer . Surg Gynecol Obstet 92:443-452, 1951;.
Park WW, Lees JC:  The absolute curability of cancer of the breast . Surg Gynecol Obstet 93:129-152, 1951;.
Zelen M:  A hypothesis for the natural time history of breast cancer . Cancer Res 28:207-216, 1968;.
Lee BJ, Stubenbord JG:  A clinical index of malignancy for carcinoma of breast . Surg Gynecol Obstet 47:812-814, 1928;.
Richards GE:  Mammary cancer; place of surgery and of radiotherapy in its management; study of some of the factors which determine success or failure in treatment . Br J Radiol 21:109-127, 1948;.
Lalanne CM, et al:  Quelques aspects due prognostic du cancer du sein . J Radiol Electrol Med Nucl 48:705-708, 1967;.
Berkson J:  Prognosis of malignant tumors of the breast: A review of recent experience of the Mayo clinic . Acta Unio Int Contra Cancrum 18:1003-1008, 1962;.
Kusama S, et al:  The gross rates of growth of human mammary carcinoma . Cancer 30:594-599, 1972;.
Feinstein AR:  A clinical method for estimating the rate of growth of a cancer . Yale J Biol Med 41:422-433, 1969;.
Feinstein AR:  Clinical biostatistics: XI. Sources of "chronology bias" in cohort statistics . Clin Pharmacol Ther 12:864-879, 1971;.
Clinical stage classifications and presentation of results: Malignant tumors of the breast. 1960-1964: International Union Against Cancer . Committee on Clinical Stage Classification and Applied Statistics, Geneva.
Berndt H, Titze U:  TNM clinical stage classification of breast cancer . Int J Cancer 4:837-844, 1969;.
MacKay EN, Sellers AH:  A prospective trial of the TNM classification of breast cancer by the regional cancer treatment centres in Ontario, 1960-1964 . Int J Cancer 6:517-528, 1970;.
Feinstein AR:  Clinical biostatistics: XVII. Synchronous partition and bivariate evaluation in predictive stratification . Clin Pharmacol Ther 13:755-768, 1972;.
Crile G Jr:  The case for local excision of the breast in selected cases . Lancet 1:549-551, 1972;.

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

Feinstein AR:  Clinical biostatistics: XIV. The purposes of prognostic stratification . Clin Pharmacol Ther 13:285-297, 1972;.
Feinstein AR:  Clinical biostatistics: XXIV. The role of randomization in sampling, testing, allocating, and credulous idolatry (conclusion) . Clin Pharmacol Ther , 14:1035-1051, 1973;.
Charlson M, Feinstein AR:  An analytic critique of existing systems of staging for breast cancer . Surgery 73:579-598, 1973;.
Macdonald I:  Mammary carcinoma: A review of 2,636 cases . Surg Gynecol Obstet 74:75-82, 1942;.
Macdonald I:  Biologic predeterminism in human cancer . Surg Gynecol Obstet 92:443-452, 1951;.
Park WW, Lees JC:  The absolute curability of cancer of the breast . Surg Gynecol Obstet 93:129-152, 1951;.
Zelen M:  A hypothesis for the natural time history of breast cancer . Cancer Res 28:207-216, 1968;.
Lee BJ, Stubenbord JG:  A clinical index of malignancy for carcinoma of breast . Surg Gynecol Obstet 47:812-814, 1928;.
Richards GE:  Mammary cancer; place of surgery and of radiotherapy in its management; study of some of the factors which determine success or failure in treatment . Br J Radiol 21:109-127, 1948;.
Lalanne CM, et al:  Quelques aspects due prognostic du cancer du sein . J Radiol Electrol Med Nucl 48:705-708, 1967;.
Berkson J:  Prognosis of malignant tumors of the breast: A review of recent experience of the Mayo clinic . Acta Unio Int Contra Cancrum 18:1003-1008, 1962;.
Kusama S, et al:  The gross rates of growth of human mammary carcinoma . Cancer 30:594-599, 1972;.
Feinstein AR:  A clinical method for estimating the rate of growth of a cancer . Yale J Biol Med 41:422-433, 1969;.
Feinstein AR:  Clinical biostatistics: XI. Sources of "chronology bias" in cohort statistics . Clin Pharmacol Ther 12:864-879, 1971;.
Clinical stage classifications and presentation of results: Malignant tumors of the breast. 1960-1964: International Union Against Cancer . Committee on Clinical Stage Classification and Applied Statistics, Geneva.
Berndt H, Titze U:  TNM clinical stage classification of breast cancer . Int J Cancer 4:837-844, 1969;.
MacKay EN, Sellers AH:  A prospective trial of the TNM classification of breast cancer by the regional cancer treatment centres in Ontario, 1960-1964 . Int J Cancer 6:517-528, 1970;.
Feinstein AR:  Clinical biostatistics: XVII. Synchronous partition and bivariate evaluation in predictive stratification . Clin Pharmacol Ther 13:755-768, 1972;.
Crile G Jr:  The case for local excision of the breast in selected cases . Lancet 1:549-551, 1972;.
CME Course for:


You need to register in order to view this quiz.


To understand the clinical management of acute heart failure syndromes.
Accreditation Information The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
To view and print your certificate and access a summary of your CME courses go to My CME.
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s “Cited By” API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Response

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.