We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Commentary |

The NIH Undiagnosed Diseases Program Lessons Learned

William A. Gahl, MD, PhD; Cynthia J. Tifft, MD, PhD
JAMA. 2011;305(18):1904-1905. doi:10.1001/jama.2011.613.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


On May 19, 2008, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Undiagnosed Diseases Program (UDP) was launched to address an unmet need in the US health care system, ie, the diagnosis of mysterious, often multisystem diseases. A prime mover in initiating the program was the recognition by the NIH Office of Rare Diseases Research that it took 1 to 5 years to reach a proper diagnosis for 33% of patients with rare disorders and more than 5 years for 15% of these patients.1 Moreover, at least 6% of the inquiries to the Genetic and Rare Diseases Information Center were from individuals still seeking a diagnosis. A second critical motivation for establishing the program was to discover new diseases that would provide medically relevant insights into biochemistry, physiology, and cell biology. After receiving $280 000 in funding from the Office of Rare Diseases Research, and with the support of the National Human Genome Research Institute and the NIH Clinical Center, the program's popularity and publicity increased rapidly, and the budget was increased to $1.9 million in fiscal year 2009 and to $3.5 million annually for fiscal years 2010 through 2012.

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview




Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

31 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: A Manual for Evidence-Based Clinical Practice, 3rd ed
Finding the Evidence