0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention |

Vital Signs: Prevalence, Treatment, and Control of Hypertension—United States, 1999-2002 and 2005-2008 FREE

JAMA. 2011;305(15):1531-1534. doi:.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

MMWR. 2011;60:103-108

Abstract, 2 figures, 1 table omitted

On February 1, this report was posted as an MMWR Early Release on the MMWR website (http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr).

INTRODUCTION

Hypertension, a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease, affects approximately one in three adults in the United States. Every year, hypertension contributes to one out of every seven deaths in the United States and to nearly half of all cardiovascular disease—related deaths, including stroke.1 If all hypertensive patients were treated sufficiently to reach the goal specified in current clinical guidelines, 46,000 deaths might be averted each year.2 In addition to the cost in lives lost, hypertension is costly to the health-care system. The American Heart Association recently estimated that direct and indirect costs of hypertension are more than $93.5 billion per year, and that cardiovascular disease and stroke account for 17% of the total health expenditures in the United States annually.3

This report uses data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) to examine the prevalence, pharmacologic treatment, and control of hypertension among U.S. adults. The examination focuses on indicators of the use of medical care, as well as on demographic characteristics and socioeconomic factors.

METHODS

NHANES is a complex, multistage probability sample of the noninstitutionalized population of the United States. Details of the NHANES methodology can be found elsewhere.4 Data from NHANES from 2005-2008, the most recent nationally representative data available on hypertension, were analyzed. During this time frame, 11,154 participants aged ≥18 years were interviewed and examined. Women who were pregnant or whose pregnancy status could not be determined (505) were excluded, as were participants who did not have at least one complete blood pressure measurement or information on current medication usage (617), or were missing covariates of interest (56), yielding an analytic sample of 10,037.

To examine changes over time, 1999-2002 NHANES data also were analyzed. From the 10,393 adult participants included in those data, 830 women who were pregnant or whose pregnancy status was unknown were excluded, as were 631 participants who were missing blood pressure information and 275 participants who were missing data on the covariates of interest, yielding a sample size of 8,851. Mobile examination center response rates for NHANES ranged from 75% to 80% during the study period.

This study used the average of up to three blood pressure measurements, obtained under standard conditions during a single physical examination at the mobile examination center.4 Approximately 95% of participants had two or three complete blood pressure measurements. For participants with only one blood pressure measurement, that single measurement was used in place of an average. Current use of blood pressure—lowering medication was determined based on participant self-report. Hypertension was defined as an average systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg, an average diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg, or the current use of blood pressure—lowering medication. Treatment of blood pressure was defined as the self-reported current use of blood pressure—lowering medication, and its prevalence was calculated among all those defined as having hypertension. Blood pressure control was defined as a treated blood pressure <140 mmHg systolic and <90 mmHg diastolic, and its prevalence was calculated among all those with hypertension, as defined above.

Multivariate regression analysis was used to examine changes in prevalence of high blood pressure, blood pressure medication use, and pharmacologic control of high blood pressure from 1999-2002 to 2005-2008. All analyses were conducted using statistical software to account for sampling weights and adjust variances for the multistage, clustered sample designs. Population counts were calculated using the Current Population Surveys.*

RESULTS

The overall U.S. prevalence of hypertension among adults aged ≥18 years in 2005-2008 was 30.9% and was highest among persons aged ≥65 years (69.7%), non-Hispanic blacks (38.6%), and those participants with Medicare coverage (68.1%). Among persons with hypertension, the prevalence of pharmacologic treatment in 2005-2008 was 69.9%. The prevalence of treatment was lowest among persons aged 18-39 years (37.4%), Mexican Americans (56.1%), those without a usual source of medical care (19.8%), those who reported receiving medical care less than twice during the previous year (33.8%), and those without health insurance (43.5%). The overall prevalence of control among participants with hypertension was 45.8% during 2005-2008. The prevalence of control was lowest among persons aged 18-39 years (31.4%), Mexican Americans (36.9%), those without a usual source of medical care (12.1%), those who received medical care less than twice in the previous year (21.1%), and those without health insurance (29.0%). However, additional analysis using the same 2005-2008 NHANES data showed that 86.1% of adults with uncontrolled hypertension had either public or private medical insurance.

The prevalence of hypertension did not change significantly from 1999-2002 (28.1%) to 2005-2008 (30.9%), after adjustment for sex, age, race/ethnicity, and poverty-income ratio (p=0.24). The prevalence of pharmacologic treatment among those with hypertension increased from 60.3% to 69.9% during this period, and the adjusted increase was significant (p<0.01). The prevalence of control also changed significantly during this time, increasing from 33.2% in 1999-2002 to 45.8% in 2005-2008 (p<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS AND COMMENTS

The results of this analysis show that the prevalence of hypertension in U.S. adults during 2005-2008 was approximately 30%; another NHANES report has shown that this prevalence has remained unchanged during the past 10 years.5 Significant increases in the prevalence of pharmacologic treatment and control of blood pressure among persons with hypertension have been observed in the past decade.

In spite of these gains, 30% of patients with hypertension are not being treated pharmacologically, and only 46% of persons with hypertension have their blood pressure under control. The greatest need for improvement in control is among those persons who do not have a usual source of medical care, those who reported receiving care less than twice in the previous year, and those without health insurance.

The findings of this study are consistent with the findings of other studies illustrating that inadequate control of hypertension often is related to gaps in availability of, access to, use of, or continuity of health care.6,7 The Affordable Care Act (ACA) is intended to extend insurance coverage to 94% of the non-elderly U.S. population by 2019.8,9 By reducing patient out-of-pocket expenses for medical visits, ACA provisions extending insurance coverage for preventive services with no cost sharing are designed to enhance patient access to those preventive services and are anticipated to improve patient use of those services.8,9 Among those with uncontrolled hypertension, approximately 86% reported having some form of health insurance, indicating that for most patients, insurance is necessary but not sufficient to achieve blood pressure control. Several programmatic initiatives promoted by ACA, including patient-centered medical homes, accountable care organizations, and the federally qualified health center program,9 can contribute to improved health-care access and quality.

Poor adherence to medication regimens is another barrier to blood pressure control and might explain, in part, the low prevalence of blood pressure control observed even among patients with health insurance. Medication costs, complicated regimens, adverse effects, and insufficient physician-patient communication are among major factors cited as associated with decreased patient adherence to medication regimens.10

The American Heart Association; the Joint National Committee on the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure; and the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force also recommend the adoption of non-pharmacologic therapies associated with reductions in blood pressure. These recommendations include (1) achieving and maintaining a healthy body weight; (2) participating in regular leisure-time physical activity; (3) adoption of a healthy diet, including reduced salt intake and increased potassium intake; (4) smoking cessation; and (5) stress management.

Numerous clinical trials and longitudinal studies demonstrate that even small reductions in salt intake lower blood pressure and might prevent development of hypertension or improve blood pressure control among adults with hypertension.11 If average sodium intake in the United States was reduced from the current level of >3,400 mg/day to no more than 2,300 mg/day, an estimated 11 million fewer adults would be hypertensive. A reduction of 16.4 million cases of hypertension could be observed if intake were decreased to the recommended adequate intake of 1,500 mg/day.12 However, 90% of U.S. adults consume more salt than is recommended currently, nearly 80% of which comes from packaged, processed, and restaurant foods.13

Reducing sodium intake to recommended levels will require changes in the manufacture and production of packaged, processed, and restaurant food, as well as changes by persons in their food consumption. Some manufacturers have committed to substantial sodium reduction, as has been done in other countries.14 On January 20, 2011, for example, Walmart announced plans to reduce sodium content of their corporate label foods by 25% by 2015.15 Persons can lower their sodium intake by consuming more fresh fruits and vegetables and selecting food products and menu items labeled as “low sodium” or “no sodium added.” This is particularly important for those in population groups that have a high risk for cardiovascular disease, including those with hypertension, older adults, African Americans, and those with diabetes or chronic kidney disease.16 Food manufacturers and restaurants have an opportunity to positively affect the health of the nation by voluntarily and gradually reducing the amount of sodium used in processed, packaged, and restaurant foods.

Lifestyle and environmental strategies to reduce blood pressure also might benefit persons who have blood pressure that is below 140/90 mmHg, but not necessarily optimal. Blood pressure reductions below the threshold for clinical hypertension (i.e., down to 115/75 mmHg) can have additional health benefits over time. For example, in a meta-analysis of 61 prospective observational studies of blood pressure and mortality, each 20 mmHg increase in usual systolic blood pressure (or, approximately equivalently, 10 mmHg increase in usual diastolic blood pressure) above 115/75 mmHg was associated with more than a twofold increase in stroke mortality, and with a twofold increase in death from coronary heart disease and other vascular causes of death at ages 40-69 years.17

Progress in hypertension control cannot be achieved without improvements in health-care quality. Efforts to improve measurement of successes and shortfalls, such as the Physician Quality Reporting Initiative,† are designed to improve provider performance. System improvements, including adoption of electronic health records with registry and clinical decision support functions, will facilitate better patient management and the generation of patient and physician reminders to improve patient-physician interaction and patient follow-up.18 Other promising system improvements include nurse- or pharmacist-led care, which can improve preventive care delivery and reduce time pressures on physicians. Improved access and quality improvement efforts might need to be particularly focused on groups for whom the prevalence of control is especially low, such as young adults and Mexican Americans.

The findings in this report are subject to at least three limitations. First, the prevalence of hypertension in the U.S. population might be underestimated because older persons residing in nursing homes and other institutions, who have a higher prevalence of age-related hypertension, are not included in the NHANES. Second, although data collection is standardized, NHANES self-reported data on the use of blood pressure medications from interviews and questionnaires might be subject to misunderstanding and/or recall bias. Finally, this report focuses exclusively on pharmacologic treatment of hypertension. It does not take into account patients who might have reduced their blood pressure through lifestyle or dietary changes. Some of the participants in this study whose blood pressure levels were measured as normal might have been treated and successfully controlled with life-style modifications; thus, they would not have been classified as having hypertension.

Hypertension affects an estimated 68 million U.S. adults, yet only 70% receive treatment and fewer than half of these conditions are controlled. Better control of blood pressure is needed, not only through improved access to and use of health care, but also through improvements in medical care delivery systems and patients' adherence to treatment, increased access to healthful foods, and physical activity. The development of targeted programs for special groups (e.g., persons who are uninsured) is warranted. Success in improving blood pressure control requires comprehensive strategies with participation from federal, state, and local governments; health-care providers; employers; nonprofit organizations; and food, restaurant, and pharmaceutical industries.

REPORTED BY:

C Gillespie, MS, EV Kuklina, MD, PhD, PA Briss, MD, NA Blair, MPH, Y Hong, MD, PhD, Div for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This report is based, in part, on contributions by B Bowman, S Posner, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion; and S Yoon, N Sonnenfeld, and S Schober, National Center for Health Statistics, CDC.

Key Points

  • In 2005-2008, 31% of U.S. adults had hypertension (blood pressure ≥140/90 mmHg or reported current use of blood pressure lowering medication).

  • No significant decline in the national prevalence of hypertension occurred in the past decade, despite more people with hypertension being treated (70%) and controlled (46%).

  • Among hypertensive persons, the groups with the lowest prevalence of blood pressure control are adults aged 18-39 years (31%), Mexican Americans (37%), those without health insurance (29%), those without a usual source of medical care (12%), and those who received medical care less than twice in the previous year (21%).

  • Approximately 86% of persons with uncontrolled hypertension reported having some form of health insurance, indicating that for most patients, having insurance is not sufficient to achieve blood pressure control.

  • To control hypertension in the U.S. population, a comprehensive approach is needed that involves not only improved access to health care, but also improved medical care delivery systems, patient adherence to prescribed treatment, and increased access to healthful foods and physical activity.

  • Additional information is available at http://www.cdc.gov/vitalsigns.

REFERENCES

18 Available.

*Additional information is available at http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/tutorials/nhanes/faqs.htm.

†Available at https://www.cms.gov/PQRI.

Figures

Tables

References

Letters

CME
Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Web of Science® Times Cited: 1

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles
JAMAevidence.com

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature
Clinical Scenario

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature
Example 1: Diabetes and Target Blood Pressure