We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Article |

Diagnosis of Metastatic Melanocarcinoma by Lymphography

Alex Norman, MD; Joseph R. Wilder, MD
JAMA. 1963;186(3):269-270. doi:10.1001/jama.1963.63710030045021e.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


THE ACCURACY in detecting tumor metastasis to lymph nodes by lymphography has clearly established limitations. After the initial wave of enthusiasm regarding patterns of lymph node opacification in specific disease entities, investigators in the field have developed more sober outlooks for the diagnostic value of lymphography. Our accumulated knowledge is pointing up less reliance on diagnosis of specific disease except for the group of lymphomas which demonstrate with reasonable frequency the "lacy" or "foamy" pattern of lymph node opacification.

The "moth-eaten" pattern of metastatic embolic carcinomatosis to lymph nodes has been an inconsistent finding in our experience, often seen in incomplete opacification from low-volume injections into intralymphatic channels. Fischer et al1 have likewise revealed radiolucencies in normal contrast medium-filled nodes, so that a filling defect cannot be unequivocally accepted as evidence of metastasis. They showed photographs of lymph nodes in eight individuals of a group of 38 normal males


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview




Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...