Commentary |

Reexamining Metrics for Glucose Control

Katya B. Rubinow, MD; Irl B. Hirsch, MD
JAMA. 2011;305(11):1132-1133. doi:10.1001/jama.2011.314.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


The hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) assay was first used more than 30 years ago as a marker of diabetes control. Despite its availability for 2 decades, HbA1c testing did not assume a central role in diabetes care until the publication of 2 major clinical trials. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) and the UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) demonstrated that HbA1c level strongly predicts risk of microvascular complications associated with type 1 and type 2 diabetes, respectively.1,2 Largely consequent to these findings, HbA1c level has become the primary basis for diabetes diagnosis, treatment decisions, and assessment of quality health care. As clinical application of HbA1c measurement expands, so does the need for caution in its interpretation and appreciation of its substantial limitations.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





You need to register in order to view this quiz.
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Web of Science® Times Cited: 14

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics
PubMed Articles