0
From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention |

Self-Reported Influenza-like Illness During the 2009 H1N1 Influenza Pandemic—United States, September 2009–March 2010 FREE

JAMA. 2011;305(10):991-993. doi:.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

MMWR. 2011;60: 37-41

2 figures, 1 table omitted

CDC identified the first case of 2009 H1N1 pandemic influenza on April 15, 2009. During the first 3 months of the outbreak, approximately 43,000 cases were reported to CDC (1). In June 2009, the World Health Organization declared the outbreak an influenza pandemic. Because no existing influenza surveillance system in the United States monitored influenza-like illness (ILI) among persons with ILI who did not seek health care, CDC initiated community-based surveillance of self-reported ILI (defined as the presence of fever with cough or sore throat) and health-care—seeking behavior through a supplementary module of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). This report summarizes results from BRFSS surveys conducted during September 2009–March 2010. Among 216,431 adults and 43,511 children (aged <18 years), the average monthly percentage of respondents reporting ILI in the 30 days preceding the interview was 8.1% among adults (range: 5.5% for September interviews to 9.5% for November) and 28.4% among children (range: 20.4% for September interviews to 35.9% for November). Health care was sought by 40% of adults and 56% of children with self-reported ILI. The results indicate that reported symptoms of ILI were widespread during the 2009-10 influenza season, with a substantial percentage of those reporting ILI seeking health care.

BRFSS conducts state-based, random-digit—dialed telephone surveys of the noninstitutionalized U.S. population aged ≥18 years to determine the prevalence of health conditions and health risk behaviors.2 From September 1, 2009, to March 31, 2010, BRFSS respondents in 49 states (excluding Vermont), the District of Columbia (DC), and Puerto Rico were interviewed using a new module for ILI. One of each respondent's children also was eligible to be the subject of the interview in 39 of the 49 states, DC, and Puerto Rico. Reported fever with cough or sore throat during the 30 days preceding the interview (for themselves or their child) was defined as having ILI in the past month.* Those respondents who reported ILI also were asked if they (or their child) visited a health-care professional for the illness.†

Average monthly percentages of self-reported ILI were calculated. ILI was analyzed by age group, month of interview, sex, race/ethnicity,‡ and U.S. Census region.§ Percentage estimates for race/ethnicity were age-adjusted by the direct method to the 2000 U.S. Census population. Respondents with missing ILI status or who resided in states where interviews were conducted for <6 months were excluded from analysis. Results were weighted to reflect selected demographic and geographic population estimates, in accordance with BRFSS weighting methodology.2 Response rates for BRFSS were calculated using Council of American Survey and Research Organizations (CASRO) guidelines. Median survey response rates were 55.2%, calculated as the percentage of persons who completed interviews among all eligible persons, including those who were not contacted. Median cooperation rates were 75.3%, calculated as the percentage of persons who completed interviews among all eligible persons who were contacted. Statistical significance was determined by t tests where appropriate; comparisons were considered statistically significant at p<0.05.

In interviews conducted during September 2009–March 2010, the average monthly percentage of adults reporting ILI was 8.1%, and the percentage of children with reported ILI was 28.4%. Reported ILI among adults (9.5%) and children (35.9%) peaked in November interviews, which corresponds with illness in October or November. This pattern was observed in all census regions, except among adults in the South, where ILI peaked in December interviews. Reported ILI among adults (5.5%) and children (20.4%) was lowest for September interviews.

The monthly percentage of respondents reporting ILI decreased with age; the percentage was highest among children aged 0-4 years (32.7%) and lowest among adults aged ≥65 years (3.2%). Among all adults, a significantly higher percentage of women (9.0%) reported ILI than men (7.1%), but no statistically significant difference by sex was observed among children (p=0.11). Compared with white adults (8.4%) and children (29.9%), those identified as American Indian/Alaska Native adults (16.3%) and children (40.8%) reported significantly higher ILI prevalence, and those identified as black adults (7.2%) and children (23.3%) reported significantly lower ILI prevalence.

Among adults, no statistically significant differences were observed by census region. However, among children, those in the Midwest (29.4%) and South (29.5%) were significantly more likely to have reported ILI than those in the Northeast (26.2%). By state, adults in Arkansas were the most likely to report ILI (11.5%), whereas those in Delaware were the least likely (5.3%). Among children, those in Oklahoma were the most likely to report ILI (33.4%), whereas those in DC were the least likely (21.5%). Health care was sought by 40% of adults and 56% of children with ILI.

Reported by: M Biggerstaff, MPH, L Kamimoto, MD, L Finelli, DrPH, Influenza Div, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases; L Balluz, PhD, ScD, Div of Behavioral Surveillance, Office of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Svcs, CDC.

CDC Editorial Note: With the emergence of 2009 H1N1 influenza, CDC initiated community-based monitoring of self-reported ILI as a method for assessing the impact of 2009 H1N1 influenza on persons who did not seek health care. Results indicate that self-reported ILI was more common among younger respondents and less common among older respondents, a finding consistent with reports from other influenza surveillance systems.1

After adjusting for age, the percentage of self-reported ILI in adults and children was similar among whites and Hispanics, moderately lower among black adults and children, and significantly higher among American Indian/Alaska Native adults and children. Reasons for these differences are not clear and are being investigated, but severe outcomes from influenza and other respiratory infections have been reported more commonly among children in certain racial/ethnic groups than in others.3

The findings in this report are subject to at least five limitations. First, BRFSS ILI data are self-reported or reported by parents for their children; thus, symptoms, including fever, were not confirmed. However, self-reported symptoms of infectious illness, including respiratory illnesses, have shown close congruence with physician documentation.4 Second, the reported cases of ILI were not laboratory-confirmed as influenza infection. Influenza infection can cause illnesses that do not meet the ILI case definition (e.g., respiratory illness without fever); conversely, illnesses meeting the ILI criteria can be caused by multiple pathogens other than influenza (e.g., respiratory syncytial virus). Studies have indicated that 10%-25% of all respiratory illnesses occurring during periods when influenza viruses are known to be circulating are actually laboratory-confirmed influenza.57 The sensitivity and specificity of the ILI definition for influenza illness can vary substantially, but requiring fever as part of the ILI criteria has been shown to increase the specificity of ILI for influenza illness.89 Third, BRFSS data are collected only from households with a landline telephone. Selection bias related to exclusion of households with only cellular phones or no telephone service is possible; however, BRFSS weighting methodology partially compensates for the exclusion of households without telephones. Fourth, respondents from nine states were excluded from the analysis of ILI in children, and six of the excluded states were in the South census region. Therefore, results from the ILI analysis for children might not be representative of the United States overall and particularly of the South census region. Finally, the median state response rate for this survey period was only 55.2%; low response rates can increase the potential for bias.

Community-based ILI surveillance through BRFSS provided important information to help describe the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic and the epidemiology of ILI in the United States. These data were a useful adjunct to routine influenza surveillance and provided the only source of information for persons with ILI who did not seek health care. CDC continues to use the supplementary ILI module during the 2010-11 influenza season; the results will enable analysis of year-to-year trends and factors associated with self-reported ILI.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This report is based, in part, on contributions by BRFSS state coordinators; M Jhung, MD, Influenza Div, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases; and W Garvin and M Qayad, Div of Behavioral Surveillance, Office of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Svcs, CDC.

What is already known on this topic?

CDC identified the first case of 2009 H1N1 pandemic influenza on April 15, 2009. In June 2009, the World Health Organization declared the outbreak an influenza pandemic. Routine U.S. influenza surveillance systems provided information describing visits to health-care providers for influenza-like illness (ILI) and reports of influenza-associated hospitalizations and deaths, but did not monitor ILI among persons who did not seek health care.

What is added by this report?

During September 2009–March 2010, the average monthly percentage of adults and children with reported symptoms of ILI during the preceding 30 days was 8.1% and 28.4%, respectively. Health care was sought by 40% of adults and 56% of children with ILI.

What are the implications for public health practice?

The results indicate that a large segment of the population reported symptoms of ILI and sought health care for those symptoms during the 2009-10 influenza season. Community-based surveillance of influenza was a useful adjunct to routine influenza surveillance and provided the only source of information regarding persons with ILI who did not seek health care.

*To determine the presence of ILI among adult respondents, two questions were asked: “During the past month, were you ill with a fever?” and “Did you also have a cough and/or sore throat?” A “yes” response to both was classified as ILI. To determine the presence of ILI among children, adult respondents were asked one question about their child: “Has the child had a fever with cough and/or sore throat during the past month?” A “yes” response was classified as ILI.

†To determine whether medical care was sought among those with ILI, respondents were asked: “Did you [or your child] visit a doctor, nurse, or other health professional for this illness?”

‡Respondents were categorized into four non-Hispanic racial populations: white, black, American Indian/Alaska Native, and other race. Person categorized as Hispanic might be of any race.

§Northeast: Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Vermont. Midwest: Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, and Wisconsin. South: Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, and West Virginia. West: Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming.

REFERENCES

Jhung M, Swerdlow D, Olsen S,  et al.  Epidemiology of 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) in the United States.  Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52(suppl 1)  S13-S26
Link to Article
CDC. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System operational and user's guide. 2006. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2006. Available at ftp://ftp.cdc.gov/pub/data/brfss/userguide.pdf. Accessed January 14, 2011
Iwane MK, Edwards KM, Szilagyi PG,  et al; New Vaccine Surveillance Network.  Population-based surveillance for hospitalizations associated with respiratory syncytial virus, influenza virus, and parainfluenza viruses among young children.  Pediatrics. 2004;113(6):1758-1764
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Orts K, Sheridan JF, Robinson-Whelen S, Glaser  R, Malarkey WB, Kiecolt-Glaser JK. The reliability and validity of a structured interview for the assessment of infectious illness symptoms.  J Behav Med. 1995;18(6):517-529
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Monto AS, Ullman BM. Acute respiratory illness in an American community. The Tecumseh study.  JAMA. 1974;227(2):164-169
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Bridges CB, Thompson WW, Meltzer MI,  et al.  Effectiveness and cost-benefit of influenza vaccination of healthy working adults: A randomized controlled trial.  JAMA. 2000;284(13):1655-1663
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Ren L, Gonzalez R, Wang Z,  et al.  Prevalence of human respiratory viruses in adults with acute respiratory tract infections in Beijing, 2005-2007.  Clin Microbiol Infect. 2009;15(12):1146-1153
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Monto AS, Gravenstein S, Elliott M, Colopy M, Schweinle J. Clinical signs and symptoms predicting influenza infection.  Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(21):3243-3247
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Ong AK, Chen MI, Lin L,  et al.  Improving the clinical diagnosis of influenza--a comparative analysis of new influenza A (H1N1) cases.  PLoS One. 2009;4(12):e8453
PubMed   |  Link to Article

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

References

Jhung M, Swerdlow D, Olsen S,  et al.  Epidemiology of 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) in the United States.  Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52(suppl 1)  S13-S26
Link to Article
CDC. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System operational and user's guide. 2006. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2006. Available at ftp://ftp.cdc.gov/pub/data/brfss/userguide.pdf. Accessed January 14, 2011
Iwane MK, Edwards KM, Szilagyi PG,  et al; New Vaccine Surveillance Network.  Population-based surveillance for hospitalizations associated with respiratory syncytial virus, influenza virus, and parainfluenza viruses among young children.  Pediatrics. 2004;113(6):1758-1764
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Orts K, Sheridan JF, Robinson-Whelen S, Glaser  R, Malarkey WB, Kiecolt-Glaser JK. The reliability and validity of a structured interview for the assessment of infectious illness symptoms.  J Behav Med. 1995;18(6):517-529
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Monto AS, Ullman BM. Acute respiratory illness in an American community. The Tecumseh study.  JAMA. 1974;227(2):164-169
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Bridges CB, Thompson WW, Meltzer MI,  et al.  Effectiveness and cost-benefit of influenza vaccination of healthy working adults: A randomized controlled trial.  JAMA. 2000;284(13):1655-1663
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Ren L, Gonzalez R, Wang Z,  et al.  Prevalence of human respiratory viruses in adults with acute respiratory tract infections in Beijing, 2005-2007.  Clin Microbiol Infect. 2009;15(12):1146-1153
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Monto AS, Gravenstein S, Elliott M, Colopy M, Schweinle J. Clinical signs and symptoms predicting influenza infection.  Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(21):3243-3247
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Ong AK, Chen MI, Lin L,  et al.  Improving the clinical diagnosis of influenza--a comparative analysis of new influenza A (H1N1) cases.  PLoS One. 2009;4(12):e8453
PubMed   |  Link to Article
CME
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s “Cited By” API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Response

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics
JAMAevidence.com

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature
Influenza

The Rational Clinical Examination
Make the Diagnosis: Influenza