0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
ARTICLE |

Observations vs Statistics-Reply

Naomi Vaisrub, PhD
JAMA. 1985;254(20):2896. doi:10.1001/jama.1985.03360200046026.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

In Reply.—  Regrettably, Dr Feldman has missed the major point of my editorial, namely, that "final recommendations concerning the suitability of manuscripts for publication are made in consideration of the overall quality of the studies submitted, the careful documentation of results and interpretation of findings, and the perceived validity and importance of research conclusions."1 Within the peer review process, the statistical reviewer may be called on to ascertain whether reported results are based on cogent observations and logical reasoning, as well as on appropriate data analysis. Therefore, the concept of statistically sound experiments that are flawed by unsound logic is incongruous and erroneous. It is the very preservation of basic principles of sound reasoning that constitutes the primary concern of the statistical reviewer—more so than the degree of statistical sophistication exhibited in any manuscript.Although some of the studies cited by Dr Feldman may not have benefited from statistical

Topics

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

Figures

Tables

References

Letters

CME
Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Jobs
brightcove.createExperiences();