0
ARTICLE |

Racial and Ethnic Differences in Outcome in Zidovudine-Treated Patients With Advanced HIV Disease

Philippa J. Easterbrook, MD, MRCP, MPH; Jeanne C. Keruly, RN; Terri Creagh-Kirk, MS; Douglas D. Richman, MD; Richard E. Chaisson, MD; Richard D. Moore, MD, MHS; John Bartlett, MD; Grace Link, RN; Sharon McAvinue, RN; Yvonne Bryson, MD; Helene Cohen, CNP; Margaret Fischl, MD; Terry Bolin; Harold Kessler, MD; Yvonne Burrough, RN; Donna Mildvan, MD; Alice Fox, PA; Douglas Richman, MD; Ben Freeman, LPN; Gary Simon, MD; Kathy Ward Grabowy, RN; David Chernoff, MD; Patricia Duff, RN; Sumner Thompson, MD; Kara Barrett, RN; Robert Awe, MD; Ruby Chapman, RN; Shirley Leonard, RN; Paul Turner, MD; Marge Hawkins; Henry Murray, MD; Jill Bowers, RN; Hugh H. Tilson, MD; Elizabeth Andrews, PhD; Lynn Smiley, MD; Clifford Lane, MD, PhD
JAMA. 1991;266(19):2713-2718. doi:10.1001/jama.1991.03470190061030.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Objectives.  —To determine if racial-ethnic differences exist in survival, disease progression, and development of myelosuppression in zidovudine-treated patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) disease.

Design.  —Prospective observational study.

Setting.  —Hospital and private clinics in 12 metropolitan centers.

Patients.  —The study included 754 non-Hispanic white, 165 black, and 106 Hispanic patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) or advanced AIDS-related complex (ARC) who received up to 2 years of zidovudine therapy.

Outcome Measures.  —Survival, development of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP), other opportunistic infections, and myelosuppression.

Results.  —At initiation of zidovudine therapy, Hispanic and particularly black patients had more advanced HIV disease than white patients, as indicated by lower baseline CD4+ counts, hematocrits, and AIDS-defining diagnoses. Black patients with AIDS also had a worse prognosis compared with white and Hispanic patients with AIDS. The product-limit survival rates at 2 years for white, black, and Hispanic patients with AIDS were 40%, 27%, and 39%, respectively (black vs white, P =.01; Hispanic vs white, P =.32, by the log-rank test). The respective proportions of patients who developed PCP at 2 years were 46%, 66%, and 44% (black vs white, P =.0001; Hispanic vs white, P =.86) and for other opportunistic infections the proportions were 56%, 63%, and 63%, respectively (black vs white, P =.03; Hispanic vs white, P =.09). There were no significant racial-ethnic differences in survival or in the development of opportunistic infections for patients with ARC, and there were no differences in the incidence of myelosuppression or dose reduction or suspension for patients with either ARC or AIDS. After adjusting for more advanced HIV disease (mainly low CD4+ counts and hematocrits), black race was no longer a significant independent predictor of survival. Adjustment for racial differences in the use of PCP prophylaxis accounted for most of the excess risk for the development of PCP in black patients compared with white patients with AIDS.

Conclusions.  —Racial differences in survival and the development of opportunistic infections are mainly due to the more advanced HIV disease in black patients when zidovudine therapy is started and to their less frequent use of PCP prophylaxis. Innovative approaches are needed to ensure more widespread use of and earlier access to zidovudine therapy and PCP prophylaxis.(JAMA. 1991;266:2713-2718)

Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

References

CME
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s “Cited By” API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Response

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Jobs