0
ARTICLE |

A 30-Week Randomized Controlled Trial of High-Dose Tacrine in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease

Margaret J. Knapp, PharmD; David S. Knopman, MD; Paul R. Solomon, PhD; William W. Pendlebury, MD; Charles S. Davis, PhD; Stephen I. Gracon, DVM; Jeffrey T. Apter, MD; Clifford N. Lazarus, PhD; Karen E. Baker, RN, PA; Michael Barnett, MD; Barry Baumel, MD; Larry S. Eisner, MD; David Bennett, MD; Concetta Forchetti, MD; Amy Levin; John P. Blass, MD, PhD; Karen A. Nolan, PhD; Eleonore R. Gaines, MD; Norman Relkin, MD, PhD; Richard L. Borison, MD, PhD; Bruce Diamond, MD; Gastone G. Celesia, MD; Amy Perrin Ross, RN, MSN, CRNR; James Dexter, MD; Rachelle Doody, MD, PhD; Lisa Lipscomb, RN; Kurt Kreiter; Eugene A. DuBoff, MD; Paul Block, PhD; Deborah Marshall; Nancy Westergaard; Nancy L. Earl, MD; Sarah Vann Wyne; Elisabeth Hinman-Smith; Martin Farlow, MD; Hugh C. Hendrie; Judith A. Caress; Mildred Farmer, MD; Jane E. Harper; James Ferguson, MD; Norman L. Foster, MD; Nancy R. Barbas, MD; Laurie A. Bluemlein, MS, RN; Douglas J. Gelb, MD, PhD; Stanley Berent, PhD; Bruno Giordani, PhD; Maria Greenwald, MD; Scott Bergman, MD; Linda F. Roger; Adrian Groenendyk, MD; Myrna Wood, RN; Claire Jurkowski, MD; Ira Katz, MD, PhD; Suzanne Doyle, RN; Buster D. Smith, MD; Charles Kellner, MD; Hilary J. Bernstein, MSN; David L. Bachman, MD; Susan Deinard; Linda Langley; Sarah Bridges; Richard A. Margolin, MD; Mary Candice Burger, PhD; Susan Longwith Wiser, RN, BSN; Caryn Crenshaw, RNC; John C. Morris, MD; Eugene H. Rubin, MD; Mary A. Coats, RN, MSN; Patricio F. Reyes, MD; Catherine Bentz, MS; Lara L. Doyle; Marilyn M. Rymer, MD; Irene E. Bettinger, MD; M. Pat Laubinger, RN, MPA; Carl H. Sadowsky, MD; Walter Martinez; José Zuniga; Reed Stone; Paul Winner; Lazlo Maté; Carla Lessard, RN; Lon Schneider, MD; Sonia Pawluczyk, MD; Ward T. Smith, MD; Scott N. Losk, PhD; Linda Marambe, RN; Mary Ellen Groccia-Ellison; Keith R. Edwards, MD; John Taylor, MD; Vincent P. Calabrese; Stephen W. Harkins; Stephen G. Thein Jr, PhD; Judith A. Dewar, RN; Geri Williams, LVN; Carol Drennan, RN; Paul Tuttle, MD; Nancy Principi, RN; Elaine M. Ford, RN; Robert J. Tyndall, MD; Connie K. Kelley, RN
JAMA. 1994;271(13):985-991. doi:10.1001/jama.1994.03510370037029.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Objective.  —To evaluate the efficacy and safety of high-dose tacrine hydrochloride over 30 weeks in patients with probable Alzheimer's disease.

Design.  —A 30-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial.

Setting.  —Outpatients at 33 US centers.

Patients.  —Men and women at least 50 years of age with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease and otherwise in good health.

Interventions.  —Group 1 received placebo; group 2 received 40 mg/d of tacrine for 6 weeks, then 80 mg/d for 24 weeks; groups 3 and 4 received 40 mg/d of tacrine for 6 weeks, 80 mg/d for 6 weeks, and 120 mg/d for 6 weeks. Group 3 remained on a dosage of 120 mg/d for a total of 18 weeks; after 6 weeks at 120 mg/d, group 4 titrated to 160 mg/d for the last 12 weeks.

Primary Outcome Measures.  —Clinician Interview-Based Impression (CIBI), Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale—Cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog), and Final Comprehensive Consensus Assessment (FCCA).

Results.  —A total of 663 patients entered the study; 653 patients were included in an intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis; 263 had evaluable data at 30 weeks. The results of the ITT analysis revealed significant (P≤.05) dose-response trends and between-group comparisons on CIBI and ADAS-Cog. In evaluable patients, significant dose-response trends were observed for all three primary measures (P≤.001). Significant differences in favor of 160 mg/d of tacrine vs placebo were observed on the CIBI (P≤.002) and ADAS-Cog and FCCA (P≤.001), as well as caregiver-global and quality-of-life assessments (P≤.05). On the CIBI, 23% and 42% of tacrine-treated patients in the ITT and evaluable-patient populations, respectively, were rated improved compared with 17% and 18% of placebo patients, respectively. The primary reasons for withdrawal of tacrine-treated patients were asymptomatic liver transaminase elevations (28%) and gastrointestinal complaints (16%). These adverse events were reversible on discontinuation of treatment, and many patients were able to restart tacrine.

Conclusions.  —Tacrine produced statistically significant, dose-related improvements on objective performance-based tests, clinician- and caregiver-rated global evaluations, and measures of quality of life. There was no evidence that the large number of patient withdrawals biased the overall conclusions of the study.(JAMA. 1994;271:985-991)

Topics

Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours

Figures

Tables

References

CME
Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Jobs
brightcove.createExperiences();