0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Other Articles |

EVALUATION OF CYTOLOGIC DIAGNOSIS OF LUNG CANCER

SEYMOUR M. FARBER, M.D.; ALLEN K. McGRATH Jr., M.D.; MORTIMER A. BENIOFF, M.D.; MILTON ROSENTHAL, M.D.
JAMA. 1950;144(1):1-4. doi:10.1001/jama.1950.02920010003001.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Since the pioneer report of Papanicolaou and Traut in 1943, most investigators have corroborated the application of cytologic technics to cancer diagnosis.1 Malignant cells have been identified in secretions and exudates from most accessible tracts of the body including the respiratory tract.

In the first evaluations of cytologic diagnosis of lung cancer, patients with a high incidence of carcinoma were studied. A circumscribed impression of the sensitivity and reliability of cytologic diagnosis was gained. A more meaningful appraisal of this diagnostic technic can be obtained by study of its result in a large series of cases with varied pulmonary conditions, in which lung cancer entered the differential diagnosis only as a possibility.2 Such a series is presented here, as are methods by which some of the pitfalls in evaluation and utilization of this technic may be avoided.

RESULTS OF EXAMINATIONS OF 2,066 PATIENTS  This report is a summary

Topics

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

References

January 19, 2009
Adhish Basu, MS, MRCS; Sarath Chandra Sistla, MS; Krishnan R. Iyengar, MD, DipNB
Arch Surg. 2009;144(1):89. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2008.527-a.
CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Jobs
brightcove.createExperiences();