0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Original Investigation |

Temporal Trends in Late Preterm and Early Term Birth Rates in 6 High-Income Countries in North America and Europe and Association With Clinician-Initiated Obstetric Interventions

Jennifer L. Richards, MPH1; Michael S. Kramer, MD2; Paromita Deb-Rinker, PhD3; Jocelyn Rouleau3; Laust Mortensen, PhD4; Mika Gissler, DPhil5; Nils-Halvdan Morken, MD, PhD6,7; Rolv Skjærven, PhD8; Sven Cnattingius, MD, PhD9; Stefan Johansson, MD, PhD9; Marie Delnord, MSc, MA10; Siobhan M. Dolan, MD, MPH11; Naho Morisaki, MD, MPH, PhD12; Suzanne Tough, PhD13; Jennifer Zeitlin, DSc10; Michael R. Kramer, PhD1
[+] Author Affiliations
1Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
2Departments of Pediatrics and of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University Faculty of Medicine, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
3Centre for Chronic Disease Prevention, Surveillance and Epidemiology Division, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
4Section of Social Medicine, University of Copenhagen, and Methods and Analysis, Statistics, Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark
5Information Services Department, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland
6Departments of Global Public Health and Primary Care and Clinical Sciences, University of Bergen, Norway
7Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
8Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Norway
9Clinical Epidemiology Unit, T2, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska University Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
10INSERM UMR 1153, Center for Epidemiology and Statistics Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
11Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Women’s Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York
12Department of Social Medicine, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
13Departments of Pediatrics and Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
JAMA. 2016;316(4):410-419. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.9635.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Importance  Clinicians have been urged to delay the use of obstetric interventions (eg, labor induction, cesarean delivery) until 39 weeks or later in the absence of maternal or fetal indications for intervention.

Objective  To describe recent trends in late preterm and early term birth rates in 6 high-income countries and assess association with use of clinician-initiated obstetric interventions.

Design  Retrospective analysis of singleton live births from 2006 to the latest available year (ranging from 2010 to 2015) in Canada, Denmark, Finland, Norway, Sweden, and the United States.

Exposures  Use of clinician-initiated obstetric intervention (either labor induction or prelabor cesarean delivery) during delivery.

Main Outcomes and Measures  Annual country-specific late preterm (34-36 weeks) and early term (37-38 weeks) birth rates.

Results  The study population included 2 415 432 Canadian births in 2006-2014 (4.8% late preterm; 25.3% early term); 305 947 Danish births in 2006-2010 (3.6% late preterm; 18.8% early term); 571 937 Finnish births in 2006-2015 (3.3% late preterm; 16.8% early term); 468 954 Norwegian births in 2006-2013 (3.8% late preterm; 17.2% early term); 737 754 Swedish births in 2006-2012 (3.6% late preterm; 18.7% early term); and 25 788 558 US births in 2006-2014 (6.0% late preterm; 26.9% early term). Late preterm birth rates decreased in Norway (3.9% to 3.5%) and the United States (6.8% to 5.7%). Early term birth rates decreased in Norway (17.6% to 16.8%), Sweden (19.4% to 18.5%), and the United States (30.2% to 24.4%). In the United States, early term birth rates decreased from 33.0% in 2006 to 21.1% in 2014 among births with clinician-initiated obstetric intervention, and from 29.7% in 2006 to 27.1% in 2014 among births without clinician-initiated obstetric intervention. Rates of clinician-initiated obstetric intervention increased among late preterm births in Canada (28.0% to 37.9%), Denmark (22.2% to 25.0%), and Finland (25.1% to 38.5%), and among early term births in Denmark (38.4% to 43.8%) and Finland (29.8% to 40.1%).

Conclusions and Relevance  Between 2006 and 2014, late preterm and early term birth rates decreased in the United States, and an association was observed between early term birth rates and decreasing clinician-initiated obstetric interventions. Late preterm births also decreased in Norway, and early term births decreased in Norway and Sweden. Clinician-initiated obstetric interventions increased in some countries but no association was found with rates of late preterm or early term birth.

Figures in this Article

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Figures

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure.
Temporal Trends in Country-Level Rates of Labor Induction, Prelabor Cesarean Delivery, and Clinician-Initiated Obstetric Intervention Among Late Preterm Births and Early Term Births, 2006-2015

For denominator data, see Table 1.

Graphic Jump Location

Tables

References

CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

1,945 Views
1 Citations
×

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles
Jobs
JAMAevidence.com

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis
Supplemental Content

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis
Supplemental Methods

brightcove.createExperiences();