We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Comment & Response |

Task-Oriented Rehabilitation Program for Stroke

Heather Tanksley Peters, MOT, OTR/L1; Stephen J. Page, PhD, MS, OTR/L1
[+] Author Affiliations
1School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Ohio State University, Columbus
JAMA. 2016;316(1):101-102. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.5016.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


To the Editor The Interdisciplinary Comprehensive Arm Rehabilitation Evaluation (ICARE) trial1 concluded that structured, task-oriented training is not superior to “usual and customary occupational therapy” (UCC) in moderately impaired stroke patients. Several weaknesses diminish confidence in the conclusions.

First, no control was exerted over the UCC content. Most occupational therapists administer repetitive, task-oriented training (ie, the treatment provided to the experimental group) as their usual care.2 Thus, the usual care provided as a control may have approximated therapy administered to patients in the experimental condition. The high resemblance between the UCC and experimental groups—and the fact that repetitive, task-oriented training has level 1A evidence supporting its application3—may at least partially explain why no statistically significant differences emerged between the groups. Additionally, because UCC was neither standardized nor controlled, clinicians likely provided a variety of efficacious, adjunctive modalities, home exercises, or both, as occurs in usual care.


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview




July 5, 2016
Carolee Winstein, PhD; Steven Wolf, PhD; Alexander W. Dromerick, MD
1University of Southern California, Los Angeles
2Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
3MedStar National Rehabilitation Hospital, Washington, DC
JAMA. 2016;316(1):102. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.5025.
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...