We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Comment & Response |

Consequences of Influencing Physician Behavior—Reply

Timothy J. Judson, MD, MPH1; Kevin G. Volpp, MD, PhD2; Allan S. Detsky, MD, PhD3
[+] Author Affiliations
1Department of Medicine, University of California-San Francisco
2LDI Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
3Institute for Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
JAMA. 2016;315(21):2351. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.1226.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


In Reply In response to our Viewpoint on extrinsic and intrinsic motivations to change physician behavior, Dr Meador states that incentives should be assessed for intended and unintended consequences, and we agree.

However, Meador argues that the rise of financial motivators has directly caused a decrease in clinical research and teaching. This argument is difficult to make conclusively, since so many factors have changed in academic medicine over this period. Our thesis in the Viewpoint was that a careful balance of extrinsic and intrinsic motivators, thoughtfully customized to one’s own organization, is key to promoting efficiency and drive. It is unlikely that any single financial motivator is decreasing the time spent on research and teaching. Instead, it is the balance of motivators and shifts in that balance that may affect how physicians spend their time.


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview




June 7, 2016
Kimford J. Meador, MD
1Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California
JAMA. 2016;315(21):2350-2351. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.1223.
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...