Editorial |

Lymph Node Counts in Colon Cancer Surgery:  Lessons for Users of Quality Indicators

Marko Simunovic, MD, MPH; Nancy N. Baxter, MD, PhD
JAMA. 2007;298(18):2194-2195. doi:10.1001/jama.298.18.2194.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


For patients undergoing curative colon cancer surgery, the presence of positive lymph nodes predicts a greater risk of disease recurrence than negative lymph nodes. Numerous studies have reported that for patients with negative nodes, survival is worse when relatively few lymph nodes are evaluated.1 Most reports suggest this is due to understaging (ie, positive lymph nodes are missed as a result of poor surgical or pathological practices) and consequently patients are falsely identified as having negative nodes. These incorrectly staged patients have a survival risk commensurate with their true node-positive status; additionally, such patients are less likely to receive (and potentially benefit from) chemotherapy. In the hope of improving patient outcomes, several stakeholder groups have identified the evaluation of 12 or more lymph nodes following colon cancer resection as an indicator of the quality of practice provided by individual surgeons or pathologists, hospitals, or regions.2 Due to concerns of understaging, the American Society of Clinical Oncology even encourages the use of chemotherapy for patients with nonmetastatic node-negative tumors in the presence of low lymph node counts.3

Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview




Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Web of Science® Times Cited: 27

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics
PubMed Articles

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature
Clinical Resolution

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature
Clinical Scenario