We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Commentary |

Factors Contributing to High Costs and Inequality in China's Health Care System

Houli Wang, MD; Tengda Xu, MD; Jin Xu, MD
JAMA. 2007;298(16):1928-1930. doi:10.1001/jama.298.16.1928.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


China, the largest developing country in the world, has experienced great economic development in recent years. Since reform and the opening-up policy were implemented in 1978, the national economy has grown at an average rate of 9.6% each year, and in 2005 China's gross domestic product (GDP) per capita reached US $1698.1 Along with economic development have come social challenges. The gap between rich and poor has widened. In 2005, China's Gini coefficient, an indicator of income distribution difference, was estimated2 at more than 0.48 (for comparison, the US Gini coefficient was 0.45 in 2004).3 Although the proportion of the population with incomes below the poverty level has decreased dramatically over the past 3 decades, about 21.5 million individuals are absolutely poor (annual income <US $85) and another 35.5 million are underprivileged (annual income US $85-$115) in China.4 More than half of the poor reside in remote western counties.4 One result of economic inequality is wide disparity in access to many social programs, especially in the health care system.

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview




Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles
The rising incidence of pediatric empyema with fistula. Pediatr Surg Int Published online Oct 31, 2015;
Australian diagnosis related groups: Drivers of complexity adjustment. Health Policy Published online Oct 28, 2015;

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature
Are the results credible?

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature
Was the Choice of Participants or Observations Explicit and Comprehensive?