Commentary |

Improving Batterer Intervention Programs Through Theory-Based Research

Gregory L. Stuart, PhD; Jeff R. Temple, PhD; Todd M. Moore, PhD
JAMA. 2007;298(5):560-562. doi:10.1001/jama.298.5.560.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a major public health concern, with at least 1.3 million women abused annually in the United States.1 In the 1980s, states began passing mandatory arrest laws that required police officers responding to domestic violence calls to make arrests when there was evidence of probable cause of violence perpetration. The proliferation of these laws inevitably led to increasing numbers of male batterers (defined here as men who are arrested for aggression against a partner) entering the criminal justice system. In a rush to address the needs of abused women, states began implementing batterer intervention programs attempting to reduce IPV recidivism. Most jurisdictions require some intervention postarrest for partner-violent men, and the majority of men in these programs have been court ordered to attend.2 Unfortunately, the overwhelming demand for and expansion of these programs outpaced research efforts assessing their efficacy. An increasing proportion of women are being arrested for partner violence and mandated to attend batterer intervention programs. Although our focus is on male offenders, additional attention should be directed toward evaluating and improving these programs for women, particularly considering that they may have distinct needs from men and would likely benefit from a different form of intervention.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview




Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Web of Science® Times Cited: 25

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics