0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention |

Mumps Epidemic—United Kingdom, 2004-2005 FREE

JAMA. 2006;295(14):1636-1637. doi:10.1001/jama.295.14.1636.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

MMWR. 2006;55:173-175

2 figures omitted

During 2004-2005, the United Kingdom (UK) experienced a nationwide epidemic of mumps, which peaked during 2005 when 56,390* notified cases were reported in England and Wales. The majority of confirmed cases during 2004-2005 were in persons aged 15-24 years, most of whom had not been eligible for routine mumps vaccination. Mumps usually is a self-limited viral disease that appears as parotitis. However, mumps also can lead to serious complications such as encephalitis or pancreatitis. This report summarizes the epidemiology of the 2004-2005 mumps epidemic in England and Wales.

Reporting was based on notified cases (i.e., clinically diagnosed cases of mumps reported by general practitioners). Since late 1994, laboratory confirmation of all notified cases of mumps has been recommended using a test to detect mumps-specific IgM antibodies in either serum or an oral fluid.1 The proportion of such cases began to increase in 1999 and increased further in each subsequent year, indicating an increase in the incidence of true infection.

The number of notified cases began increasing in 2003 and continued to increase during 2004-2005, accompanied by further increases in the proportion of confirmed cases. During 2004, a total of 16,367 cases were notified; 10,641 (65.0%) of these were tested for oral fluid IgM, and 6,047 of those cases (56.8%) were determined to be IgM positive. When combined with those cases confirmed by serum IgM testing, a total of 8,128 (49.7%) cases were laboratory confirmed during 2004, compared with 3,907 (29.9%) of 13,087 notified cases during 1999-2003. In February 2005, because of high rates of laboratory confirmation of cases among persons born during 1981-1986, the UK Health Protection Agency recommended a temporary halt to testing persons with notified cases of mumps born during those years,2 although persons in other age groups with lower rates of confirmation continued to be tested. Testing for all age groups resumed in January 2006 after a sustained decline in the number of notified cases in the last quarter of 2005.

During 2004, approximately 79.1% of confirmed cases were in persons aged 15-24 years. Among all mumps patients during 2004, approximately 3.3% were reported as having received 2 doses of measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine, and another 30.1% had received 1 dose of MMR. The number of notified cases of mumps continued to increase through the first 6 months of 2005, with 20,653 cases occurring during the first quarter and 21,981 cases during the second quarter. During the third quarter of 2005, the number of notified cases decreased by 64.0% to 7,907; during the fourth quarter, a further decrease to 5,882 notified cases was observed. During the first month of 2006, notified cases of mumps averaged approximately 500 per week.

During 2005, the majority of notified mumps cases were in persons aged 19-23 years and attending colleges or universities; the third-quarter decrease in the number of notified cases coincided with summer vacations. Local health services have been encouraged by the UK Health Protection Agency to ensure that all students have received 2 doses of MMR before leaving school. In addition, many universities have advised enrolling first-year students to receive MMR vaccination before arriving at college.

Reported by:

E Savage, PhD, JM White, FFPH, DEW Brown, FRCPath, ME Ramsay, FFPH, Immunisation Dept, Health Protection Agency Centre for Infections, London, England.

CDC Editorial Note:

In October 1988, mumps vaccination was added to the UK vaccination schedule as part of the new combined MMR vaccine. MMR replaced single measles vaccine offered at age 12-15 months; since 1996, a second dose of MMR has been offered at age 3.5-5 years. Vaccination coverage in the UK peaked during 1995, when 92% of children aged 2 years were reported as having received at least 1 dose of MMR. As of the second quarter of 2005, vaccination coverage with at least 1 dose by age 2 years had declined to 82%, with 75% of children having received 2 doses by age 5 years.

During November 1994, approximately 8 million school children aged 5-16 years (i.e., born during September 1978–August 1989) were offered combined measles-rubella vaccine to prevent a predicted epidemic of measles. At that time, a global shortage prevented offering MMR to this group. Therefore, a proportion of the 8 million children remained susceptible to mumps. Modelling based on serologic surveillance data for 1993 estimated that 19% of children aged 11-15 years in 1997 (i.e., aged 19-23 years in 2005) would be susceptible to mumps.4

The 2004-2005 mumps epidemic in the UK did not result from the decrease in MMR vaccination coverage in recent years, but rather from gaps in eligibility of certain cohorts, which has been evident during the epidemic by the age breakdown among patients with confirmed cases; mumps occurred predominantly in older teens and young adults, with the highest attack rate occurring in those born during 1983-1986.3 Persons born before September 1987 generally were not eligible for any routine mumps vaccination, although some might have received 1 dose of MMR upon school entry as part of a catch-up campaign after October 1988 that targeted children who missed their measles vaccination. Persons born before 1982 are more likely to have been exposed to mumps infection when it was still a common childhood disease. Only 2.4% of confirmed cases in 2004 occurred in persons who would have been eligible for 2 doses of MMR routinely.

The UK epidemic illustrates the susceptibility of certain cohorts who have not been vaccinated and have not developed immunity through exposure to mumps because of a decrease in mumps circulation after implementation of a childhood immunization program. The epidemic also underscores the importance of ensuring high levels of mumps immunity among adolescents and young adults when vaccination with mumps-containing vaccine is introduced into the routine immunization schedule for children.

*Provisional total.

REFERENCES
Ramsay ME, Brown DEW, Eastcott HR, Begg NT. Saliva antibody testing and vaccination in a mumps outbreak.  CDR (Lond Engl Rev). 1991;1:R96-R98
PubMed
 Changes in laboratory testing as the increase in mumps cases in England and Wales continues.  CDR Weekly2005;15
Savage E, Ramsay M, White J.  et al.  Mumps outbreaks across England and Wales in 2004: observational study.  BMJ. 2005;330:1119-1120
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Gay N, Miller E, Hesketh L. Mumps surveillance in England and Wales supports introduction of two dose vaccination schedule.  Commun Dis Rep CDR Rev. 1997;7:R21-R26
PubMed

Figures

Tables

References

Ramsay ME, Brown DEW, Eastcott HR, Begg NT. Saliva antibody testing and vaccination in a mumps outbreak.  CDR (Lond Engl Rev). 1991;1:R96-R98
PubMed
 Changes in laboratory testing as the increase in mumps cases in England and Wales continues.  CDR Weekly2005;15
Savage E, Ramsay M, White J.  et al.  Mumps outbreaks across England and Wales in 2004: observational study.  BMJ. 2005;330:1119-1120
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Gay N, Miller E, Hesketh L. Mumps surveillance in England and Wales supports introduction of two dose vaccination schedule.  Commun Dis Rep CDR Rev. 1997;7:R21-R26
PubMed
CME
Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles