We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention |

Update: FREE

JAMA. 2005;294(24):3082. doi:10.1001/jama.294.24.3082-a.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

MMWR. 2005;54:1104-1105

This report updates information on Ralstonia species associated with Vapotherm™ oxygen delivery devices (Vapotherm Inc., Stevensville, Maryland).1 CDC has obtained new information from a test developed by CDC and performed by The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (Pennsylvania) to assess the efficacy of the new chlorine dioxide disinfection protocol recommended by Vapotherm. Although limited, this information suggests that the new protocol for disinfecting Vapotherm devices and cartridges might not achieve sustained bacterial control in certain situations. At this time, the optimal protocol to disinfect machines and cartridges that might contain very heavy biofilms is not known.

Before development of the new disinfection protocol in October 2005, certain institutions had reported no growth of Ralstonia spp. in samples obtained from machines and cartridges disinfected according to the previous protocol. In addition, in an experiment conducted by an independent laboratory contracted by Vapotherm, a laboratory-generated biofilm (consisting of a mix of organisms) was grown in a Vapotherm device and cartridge for 3 weeks. The device and cartridge were then subjected to the new chlorine dioxide disinfection protocol. Results from this trial revealed no growth during the 4 days after disinfection.

However, in a single trial designed by CDC and involving one machine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia subjected a Vapotherm device and used filter cartridge to the new chlorine dioxide disinfection protocol. The device and cartridge were known to be contaminated with Ralstonia spp., and the unit had been out of service and not disinfected for multiple weeks. Samples obtained immediately after disinfection grew no organisms. The trial was initially designed to run for 30 days; however, after 7 days of continuous operation of the unit with no patient contact, samples from both the vapor condensate and the filter cartridge grew Ralstonia spp. in culture at CDC.

Whether the presence of an unusually heavy biofilm in the machine and cartridge in the hospital experiment resulted in the failure to eradicate Ralstonia spp. is unknown. Similarly, the impact of testing a laboratory-generated biofilm instead of a use-generated biofilm is not known. The varying results achieved with the new disinfection protocol might indicate that its efficacy depends on the maturity of any biofilm contained within Vapotherm machines or cartridges.

Testing is being conducted by a private laboratory and CDC to further assess the efficacy of and possible improvements to the new disinfection protocol; CDC continues to search for the source of Ralstonia spp. contamination in Vapotherm devices. Clinicians should continue to weigh the potential risks for Ralstonia spp. contamination of Vapotherm devices against the benefits of using the device in patients requiring humidified oxygen therapy.

Clinicians are encouraged to report findings of Ralstonia spp. in patients using any Vapotherm 2000 respiratory gas administration device directly to the device manufacturer, local or state health departments, or CDC by telephone, 800-893-0485. Cases or any other adverse events related to medical devices should be reported to MedWatch, the Food and Drug Administration's voluntary reporting program online at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/medwatch/; by telephone, 800-FDA-1088; by fax, 800-FDA-0178; or by mail, MedWatch, Food and Drug Administration, HF-2, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857.

Reported by:

The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Div of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Infectious Diseases, CDC.

REFERENCE: 1 available




Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles