We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Editorial |

Searching for Evidence to Support Pulmonary Artery Catheter Use in Critically Ill Patients

Jesse B. Hall, MD
JAMA. 2005;294(13):1693-1694. doi:10.1001/jama.294.13.1693.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


Five years ago in JAMA,1 I commended the critical care community for beginning in earnest the arduous process of evaluating the efficacy and effectiveness of pulmonary artery catheterization (PAC) in the treatment of high-risk surgical patients and critically ill patients cared for in the intensive care unit (ICU). I deemed this process arduous because over the years following its introduction in the 1970s, this technology had found widespread application in the ICU and perioperative setting, despite a remarkable lack of high-quality evidence supporting such use. An observational retrospective study published in 1996 suggested PAC use might be associated with adverse outcome.2 Thus, the proper study of PAC using prospective randomized study design represented a rigorous and necessary “back pedaling” from practice current at the time, never a simple process. In this issue of JAMA, 2 important articles concerning this evaluation process are published,3,4 making it timely to revisit recent studies and determine what has been learned.

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview




Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

19 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles