0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention |

Homicide and Suicide Rates—National Violent Death Reporting System, Six States, 2003 FREE

JAMA. 2005;293(20):2464-2465. doi:10.1001/jama.293.20.2464.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

HOMICIDE AND SUICIDE RATES—NATIONAL VIOLENT DEATH REPORTING SYSTEM, SIX STATES, 2003

MMWR. 2005;54:377-380

1 figure, 1 table omitted

In 2003, CDC instituted a new surveillance system, the National Violent Death Reporting System (NVDRS); the system collects detailed information regarding violent deaths from multiple sources. This report describes preliminary 2003 data from the first six states* that participated in NVDRS and compares these data with 1993-2002 data from the National Vital Statistics System (NVSS). The findings indicate a substantial increase in homicide rates among young males from 2002 to 2003 and substantial increases in both homicide and suicide rates among males from 2000 to 2003. These findings underscore the need for states to have timely information for effective violence-prevention programs.

NVDRS is a state-based, active surveillance system that collects information on all homicides, suicides, deaths of undetermined intent, deaths resulting from legal intervention, and deaths from unintentional firearm injuries. State health departments participating in NVDRS typically identify these violent deaths as their death certificates are filed and then establish details of the cases from medical examiner, coroner, and law enforcement records. Details collected include the circumstances contributing to the deaths, interpersonal relationships, and toxicology results. The first six states to join NVDRS in 2003 accounted for 10% of suicides and 11% of homicides in the United States in 2002.

International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes for the underlying cause of deaths in 2003 have not yet been reported to NVDRS from two of the six states. However, trained coders in each state routinely assign a cause of death to all cases by using standard NVDRS definitions after reviewing information from all available sources. The cause of death, as defined by NVDRS, is consistent with the way most medical examiners and coroners assign cause of death. The NVDRS cause of death used for this analysis was consistent with the underlying cause of death from death certificates in approximately 97% of the homicides and suicides for which ICD-10 codes were available. This analysis was restricted to occurrent deaths (i.e., deaths within the state borders of both residents and nonresidents) because of delays in reporting deaths of state residents that occurred out of state. All NVDRS 2003 data are preliminary.

NVDRS data for 2003 were compared with data for 1993-2002 from NVSS for the same six states. In NVSS, a homicide was defined as a death in which the underlying cause was coded as X85–Y09 or Y87.1; these codes exclude deaths attributed to legal intervention, operations of war, or terrorism.1 A suicide was defined as a death in which the underlying cause was coded as X60–X84 or Y87.0. Deaths that occurred in Oregon as a result of its Death with Dignity Act are not classified as suicides by Oregon law and were excluded from this analysis.

Rates were calculated by using intercensal and postcensal bridged-race population estimates compiled by the National Center for Health Statistics2 and were age-adjusted to the 2000 standard U.S. population. Rates were also stratified by sex and age. Because of limited death counts in some age groupings, the age categories were collapsed into ages 0-24 years, 25-64 years, and ≥65 years. Percentage changes in rates from 2002 to 2003 and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Trends in homicide and suicide rates in the six states during 2000-2003 were tested for statistical significance by using Poisson regression analysis.

During 1993-2000, the age-adjusted homicide rate for the six NVDRS states decreased 29%, from 7.0 to 5.0 per 100,000 population. During 2000-2002, the age-adjusted homicide rate for the same states increased 6%, from 5.0 to 5.3. In 2003, the six states recorded 1,952 homicides, representing a further increase of 4% (95% CI = -2%-11%) above 2002 rates. In four of the six states, homicide rates increased in 2003, but only an increase in New Jersey was statistically significant. The largest increase in rates was among males aged 0-24 years (18%; CI = 5%-32%); young males accounted for nearly all of the overall homicide increase in 2003. During 2000-2003, the trend test for homicide rates was significant, primarily because of the substantial increase in homicides among males aged 0-24 years.

During 1993-2000, the age-adjusted suicide rate for the six states declined 13%, from 10.2 to 8.9 per 100,000 population. During 2000-2002, the age-adjusted suicide rate was relatively stable in the six states, declining only 0.3%. However, in 2003, NVDRS recorded 3,415 suicides, representing a significant increase of 5% (CI = 0.4%-11%) above 2002 rates. From 2002 to 2003, suicide rates increased in four of six states, but only an increase in Oregon was statistically significant. From 2002 to 2003, significant increases were observed among females in all six states combined (19%; CI = 7%-32%) but not among males. However, during 2000-2003, the trend test for suicide rates was significant for males but not for females.

Reported by:

TL Serpi, MS, Maryland Dept of Health and Mental Hygiene. B Wiersema, Univ of Maryland, College Park; H Hackman, MD, L Ortega, MD, Massachusetts Dept of Health. BJ Jacquemin, MPH, KS Weintraub, MA, New Jersey Dept of Health and Senior Svcs. M Kohn, MD, L Millet, MSH, Oregon Dept of Human Svcs. LP Carter, MS, MA Weis, MPH, South Carolina Dept of Health and Environmental Control. KE Head, V Powell, PhD, Virginia Dept of Health. M Mueller, MPH, Public Health Prevention Svc; LJ Paulozzi, MD, Div of Violence Prevention; D White, MPS, G Ryan, PhD, Office of Statistics and Programming, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, CDC.

CDC Editorial Note:

During 1993-2000, NVSS data indicate that homicide and suicide rates declined in the United States; the age-adjusted rates of homicide and suicide declined 38% and 13%, respectively. These declines ended with small, consecutive increases in homicide and suicide rates in 2001 and 2002, even after exclusion of the deaths associated with the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.3 A similar pattern was observed during 1993-2002 in the six NVDRS states. Although preliminary national homicide and suicide rates did not increase in 2003, preliminary rates typically underestimate final rates for these conditions by 3%-4%.1 The homicide increase in NVDRS states, however, is consistent with final data from law enforcement reports compiled by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, which indicate an increase in the national homicide rate in 2003.4 The homicide rate increase in NVDRS was caused by a substantial increase in homicides among males aged ≤24 years. Similarly, fluctuations in the national homicide rate in the 1980s and early 1990s were caused by homicides among males aged 15-24 years.5

Although NVDRS collects detailed information about circumstances associated with these deaths, determining how risk factors might have changed in recent years with only 1 year of data was not possible. Changes in rates of violence have been attributed to various risk factors (e.g., changes in the economy, the availability of drugs and weapons, and gang violence),5,6 particularly with respect to homicide. NVDRS will monitor future data for changes in the proportions of violent deaths that involve specific risk factors.

The findings in this report are subject to at least three limitations. First, all death rates were based on deaths by place of occurrence rather than place of residence, and some decedents might not have resided in the six states that provided data. However, 2002 NVSS data indicate that the numbers of resident and occurrent homicides in these six states combined differed by only 1.7%, and the difference was only 0.7% with respect to suicides. Therefore, occurrent deaths are acceptable substitutes for resident deaths. Second, preliminary NVDRS data might differ from final NVDRS data if late cases are added to the system. Third, NVDRS data might differ from data generated from NVSS because the NVDRS classification of a death might differ from the way a death is recorded on a death certificate in a limited number of cases.

Although only six states began collecting data in 2003, NVDRS is now funding programs in 11 additional states† to collect data on violent deaths and submit these data to CDC. Further studies using NVDRS data will allow interpretation of broader trends across more states. Analyzing data on the circumstances associated with violent deaths should provide a better understanding of personal and social risk factors for violence and help identify potential prevention opportunities. Reviews of promising strategies conclude that those simultaneously addressing multiple risk factors for violence are most likely to be effective.7-9

Acknowledgments

The findings in this report are based, in part, on contributions by L Frazier Jr, MSPH, K Webb, J Vigeant, L Annest, PhD, other staff of the Office of Statistics and Programming, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, CDC.

REFERENCES: 9 available

*Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, Oregon, South Carolina, and Virginia

†Alaska, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Georgia, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, Utah, and Wisconsin.

Figures

Tables

References

CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles