Controversies |

Research Compensation and the Monetarization of Medicine

Stanley Joel Reiser, MD, PhD
JAMA. 2005;293(5):613-614. doi:10.1001/jama.293.5.613.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


The question of how to foster and reward research participation has 2 basic facets. One involves examining the issue from the perspective of the needs and traditions of research per se. A second facet, often neglected in discourse on the matter, is the influence of research compensation decisions on the fabric of medicine itself, particularly when it creates financial exchanges between investigators and participants. This article engages these intertwined matters.

The article by Dunn and Gordon1 draws attention to the difficult problem of recruiting research participants whose collective backgrounds mirror the population being examined. The authors maintain that the level of monetary compensation influences the participant sample created by investigators to study, which in turn requires a payment schedule that draws individuals from different income strata into given research projects. The authors do not indicate how they would determine compensation sums or convincingly deal with whether increased financial payments might exaggerate instead of diminish the overrepresentation of individuals from lower-income strata who, they argue, are disproportionately represented in many scientific studies. However, their article does point out a need to examine the generic issue of research compensation.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview




Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Web of Science® Times Cited: 5

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics