We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention |

Update: Direct and Indirect Costs of Arthritis and Other Rheumatic Conditions—United States, 1997 FREE

JAMA. 2004;291(24):2935-2936. doi:10.1001/jama.291.24.2935.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


MMWR. 2004;53:388-389

1 table omitted

The medical and societal impact of arthritis and other rheumatic conditions (AORC) has been characterized with respect to disability,1 ambulatory care,2 hospitalization,3 and economic burden.4,5 CDC's estimates of the national and state-specific costs of AORC in the United States in 1997 have been published previously.4 However, CDC has re-estimated indirect costs by enhancing the statistical methods. This report summarizes the results of that analysis, which indicated that indirect costs were $30.1 billion less than previously estimated. The total cost of AORC in the United States in 1997 was $86.2 billion (including $51.1 billion in direct costs and $35.1 billion in indirect costs), approximately 1% of the U.S. gross domestic product. Total costs attributable to AORC by state ranged from $121 million in Wyoming to $8.4 billion in California. Although indirect costs were lower than estimated previously, costs for arthritis remain high and underscore the need for better interventions to reduce the economic burden of arthritis.

Data from the 1997 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey and 2002 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System were used to derive estimated costs; these data also were used in the previous report.4 In this analysis, direct costs were medical-care expenditures, and indirect costs were lost earnings attributable to AORC. A total of 22,435 respondents aged ≥18 years had complete data for all covariates. As with the previous study, a series of two- and four-stage Duan econometric regression models6 were used to derive individual-level direct and indirect cost estimates. Direct cost models adjusted for six sociodemographic factors (i.e., categorized age [18-44 years (referent group), 45-64 years, and ≥65 years], sex, race, Hispanic ethnicity, marital status, and education level), health insurance status, and nine of the most costly comorbidities (i.e., hypertension, other forms of heart disease, pulmonary conditions, stroke, other neurologic conditions, diabetes, cancer, mental illness, and nonarthritis musculoskeletal conditions). Indirect costs also were estimated by using the Duan two- and four-stage models with adjustments for the same sociodemographic and comorbidity variables as used for the direct cost estimates. However, the indirect models did not include health insurance. Two modifications were made to the original indirect models. First, age was included in the updated model as a categorical rather than a continuous variable (using the age groups 18-34 years [referent group], 35-44 years, 45-54 years, and 55-64 years). Age was modeled in categorical form to reflect a nonlinear relation between age and indirect costs. Second, nine costly comorbidities were included in the indirect model; these variables were omitted in the previous analysis. Results from the enhanced analysis reflect a model that adjusts for sociodemographic variables and nine costly comorbidities. Methods for generating the increment and total costs attributable to AORC were the same as described previously.4

No changes were made to the cost estimates or attributable fractions for direct costs. The national indirect cost estimates decreased by $30.1 billion. The revised total cost of AORC in the United States was $86.2 billion (i.e., $51.1 billion in direct costs plus $35.1 billion in indirect costs). By state, indirect costs for AORC ranged from $49 million in Wyoming to $3.4 billion in California (median: $499 million), and total costs ranged from $121 million in Wyoming to $8.4 billion in California (Table).

Reported by:

L Murphy, Business Computer Applications, Inc., Duluth, Georgia. M Cisternas, MA, MGC Data Svcs, Carlsbad; E Yelin, PhD, L Trupin, MPH, Univ of California, San Francisco. CG Helmick, MD, Div of Adult and Community Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC.

CDC Editorial Note:

This report presents enhanced population-based indirect and total cost estimates of AORC for states and the nation in 1997, based on a revised statistical model. Direct cost estimates are unchanged from those in the previous report for AORC, but the revised indirect cost estimates are now less than the direct costs, which is the opposite of what was found in the original analysis.4 Because the indirect costs only included value of time lost from work among persons aged 18-64 years, these estimates might be considered conservative.

The strengths and limitations discussed in the previous report also apply to these estimates.4 The statistical enhancement proved important in reducing residual confounding in the model on which the indirect cost estimates were based, and illustrates how simple choices, such as the variable form (e.g., continuous versus categorical), can result in substantially different cost estimates. In this study, inclusion of a categorized, rather than continuous, age variable resulted in a 17% decrease in the national estimate of total AORC costs.

Review of the current cost-of-illness (COI) literature indicates that many COI studies are limited to estimating direct costs, although indirect costs are an important measure of societal burden of disease. In addition, few methodologic standards are available for the statistical estimation of indirect costs. Developing a consensus on methodologic standards for COI studies will help ensure that study results are valid and comparable across disease groupings and therefore of greatest value to policy makers.

References: 6 available




Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

1 Citations

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis
Original Article: Does This Adult Patient Have Septic Arthritis?

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis
Original Article: Does This Adult Patient Have Septic Arthritis?