0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention |

Child Passenger Deaths Involving Drinking Drivers—United States, 1997-2002 FREE

JAMA. 2004;291(8):934-935. doi:10.1001/jama.291.8.934.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

CHILD PASSENGER DEATHS INVOLVING DRINKING DRIVERS—UNITED STATES, 1997-2002

MMWR. 2004;53:77-79

1 table, 1 figure omitted

Motor-vehicle crashes are the leading cause of death among children aged ≥1 year in the United States,1 and one in four crash-related deaths among child passengers aged ≤14 years involves alcohol use.2 To characterize the occurrence of child passenger deaths involving drinking drivers during 1997-2002, CDC analyzed data from the Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. This report summarizes the results of that analysis, which indicated that among the 2,355 children who died in alcohol-related crashes, 1,588 (68%) were riding with drinking drivers; the majority of these children were not restrained. To reduce the number of child fatalities in alcohol-related motor-vehicle crashes, effective interventions are needed to prevent alcohol-impaired driving and to increase use of child passenger restraints.

FARS is a census of fatal motor-vehicle crashes that occur on public roadways in the United States and result in the death of an occupant or nonoccupant (e.g., pedestrian or bicyclist) within 30 days of the crash. A fatal motor-vehicle crash was classified as alcohol related if either a driver or nonoccupant had a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of ≥0.01 g/dL. When BACs were not available, they were imputed from driver and crash characteristics by using a two-stage estimation procedure.3 A drinking driver was defined as a driver with a measured or imputed BAC of ≥0.01 g/dL. Child passengers were defined as passengers aged ≤14 years.

During 1997-2002, a total of 9,622 child passengers died in motor-vehicle crashes; 2,335 (24%) were killed in crashes involving drinking drivers. Of the 2,061 alcohol-related crashes involving drinking drivers in which children were killed, 1,624 (79%) involved at least one driver with a BAC of ≥0.08 g/dL (in 31 states as of December 31, 2002, the legal BAC level for drivers aged ≥21 years is <0.08 g/dL). Of these crashes, 1,238 (60%) occurred during 6 a.m.–9 p.m.

Of the 2,335 children who died in alcohol-related crashes, 1,588 (68%) were riding with drinking drivers (Table). The median BAC of the 1,409 drinking drivers who were transporting children was 0.13 g/dL (range: 0.01-0.65 g/dL). Of the 1,409 drinking drivers involved in these crashes, 956 (68%) survived.

For all child passenger deaths, including those not involving drinking drivers, child passenger restraint use decreased as both the child's age and BAC of the child's driver increased (Figure). Of 1,451 child passengers with known restraint information who died while riding with drinking drivers, 466 (32%) were restrained at the time of the crash.

Reported by:

RA Shults, PhD, Div of Unintentional Injury Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, CDC.

CDC Editorial Note:

The findings in this report indicate that during 1997-2002, approximately 390 children died annually in alcohol-related crashes in the United States. The majority of children who died while riding with drinking drivers were not restrained at the time of the crash. The majority of drivers in these crashes survived, suggesting that certain children killed in alcohol-related crashes might have survived had they been restrained properly. Strong enforcement of child safety-seat laws and passage of primary enforcement safety-belt laws (i.e., laws that allow police to stop and ticket a driver solely because an occupant is unbelted) in all states could further reduce child passenger deaths. Because 60% of alcohol-related crashes involving child passenger deaths occurred during 6 a.m.–9 p.m., enforcement activities of child safety-seat and safety-belt laws (e.g., roadside checkpoints) are needed, especially during daylight hours. Drinking drivers have higher rates of severe crashes4; for this reason, stricter enforcement of restraint laws might substantially reduce the number of deaths of children who are transported by these drivers.

The findings in this report are subject to at least three limitations. First, because BAC data are imputed for approximately 60% of FARS cases,3 the precision of the reported BACs is reduced. Second, for crashes in which a child's driver survived, driver alcohol use might have been underreported because alcohol testing is more complete among fatalities.5 Finally, information about restraint use is obtained from police crash reports, which might overreport restraint use.6

To decrease alcohol-related crash fatalities among child passengers, communities should implement effective strategies to reduce alcohol-impaired driving, particularly among drivers who transport children. Effective policies that apply to the general driving population include sobriety checkpoints,7 lower legal BACs (e.g., <0.08 g/dL),7 administrative license suspension,8 and mandatory substance-abuse assessment and treatment for persons convicted of driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol.9 Strategies to deter persons from drinking and driving with children might include lower legal BAC limits for drivers transporting children and child endangerment laws that apply to persons who drive while intoxicated with a child in the vehicle.2 Such laws have been enacted in 35 states10; however, the effectiveness of these laws has not been evaluated.

Families and caregivers can reduce the risk to child passengers by adopting a "zero tolerance" policy regarding alcohol consumption when transporting children. When health-care providers advise caregivers about injury risks to children, they should counsel against drinking and driving. Health-care providers treating adults can screen patients for alcohol-related problems and provide them with brief interventions or refer them to treatment, as needed. Additional information regarding effective community-based interventions to increase child safety-seat and safety-belt use and to reduce alcohol-impaired driving is available from the Task Force on Community Preventive Services at http://www.thecommunityguide.org. Information about alcohol-impaired driving and child passenger safety is available from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration at http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov. Information about child endangerment laws is available from Mothers Against Drunk Driving at http://www.madd.org.

Acknowledgments

This report is based on contributions from T Lindsey, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC. KP Quinlan, MD, Dept of Pediatrics, Univ of Chicago, Illinois.

References
CDC.  Ten leading causes of death, 2000. Atlanta, Georgia: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, CDC, 2002. Available at http://webapp.cdc.gov/sasweb/ncipc/leadcaus10.html.
Quinlan KP, Brewer RD, Sleet DA, Dellinger AM. Characteristics of child passenger deaths and injuries involving drinking drivers.  JAMA.2000;283:2249-52.
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.  Transitioning to multiple imputation—a new method to impute missing blood alcohol concentration (BAC) values in FARS. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, National Center for Statistics and Analysis, 2002; publication no. DOT-HS-809-403.
Brewer RD, Morris PD, Cole TB, Watkins S, Patetta MJ, Popkin C. The risk of dying in alcohol-related automobile crashes among habitual drunk drivers.  N Engl J Med.1994;331:513-7.
Ostrom M, Huelke DF, Waller PF, Eriksson A, Blow F. Some biases in the alcohol investigative process in traffic fatalities.  Accid Anal Prev.1992;24:539-45.
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.  Police Accident Report Quality Assessment Project. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 1996; publication no. DOT-HS-808-487.
Shults RA, Elder RW, Sleet DA.  et al.  Reviews of evidence regarding interventions to reduce alcohol-impaired driving.  Am J Prev Med.2001;21:66-88.
Zador PL, Lund AK, Fields M, Weinberg K. Fatal crash involvement and laws against alcohol-impaired driving.  J Public Health Policy.1989;10:467-85.
Wells-Parker E, Bangert-Drowns R, McMillen R, Williams M. Final results from a meta-analysis of remedial interventions with drink/drive offenders.  Addiction.1995;90:907-26.
Mothers Against Drunk Driving.  Alcohol and child safety laws. Irving, Texas: Mothers Against Drunk Driving, 2004. Available at http://www3.madd.org/laws.

Figures

Tables

References

CDC.  Ten leading causes of death, 2000. Atlanta, Georgia: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, CDC, 2002. Available at http://webapp.cdc.gov/sasweb/ncipc/leadcaus10.html.
Quinlan KP, Brewer RD, Sleet DA, Dellinger AM. Characteristics of child passenger deaths and injuries involving drinking drivers.  JAMA.2000;283:2249-52.
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.  Transitioning to multiple imputation—a new method to impute missing blood alcohol concentration (BAC) values in FARS. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, National Center for Statistics and Analysis, 2002; publication no. DOT-HS-809-403.
Brewer RD, Morris PD, Cole TB, Watkins S, Patetta MJ, Popkin C. The risk of dying in alcohol-related automobile crashes among habitual drunk drivers.  N Engl J Med.1994;331:513-7.
Ostrom M, Huelke DF, Waller PF, Eriksson A, Blow F. Some biases in the alcohol investigative process in traffic fatalities.  Accid Anal Prev.1992;24:539-45.
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.  Police Accident Report Quality Assessment Project. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 1996; publication no. DOT-HS-808-487.
Shults RA, Elder RW, Sleet DA.  et al.  Reviews of evidence regarding interventions to reduce alcohol-impaired driving.  Am J Prev Med.2001;21:66-88.
Zador PL, Lund AK, Fields M, Weinberg K. Fatal crash involvement and laws against alcohol-impaired driving.  J Public Health Policy.1989;10:467-85.
Wells-Parker E, Bangert-Drowns R, McMillen R, Williams M. Final results from a meta-analysis of remedial interventions with drink/drive offenders.  Addiction.1995;90:907-26.
Mothers Against Drunk Driving.  Alcohol and child safety laws. Irving, Texas: Mothers Against Drunk Driving, 2004. Available at http://www3.madd.org/laws.
CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Web of Science® Times Cited: 2

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles