0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
msJAMA |

Physician-Assisted Suicide FREE

Rahul Rajkumar
JAMA. 2003;289(17):2278. doi:10.1001/jama.289.17.2278-a.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

While I was on a clerkship in the intensive care unit (ICU), a friend drew my attention to a chapter in Robert Zussman's book, Intensive Care. In this chapter, an intern on an ICU rotation reports a bizarre dream in which he finds penguins in a basement. In order to save one of these penguins, who can only survive in a cold environment, he puts it in a blender with some ice and turns the blender on.1

For me, the enduring lesson of my time in the ICU was that bad things can sometimes happen to people in the hospital. Sometimes a treatment can be worse than the disease itself. Sometimes our efforts seem only to prolong a patient's suffering.

Many medical students have had a similar ICU experience at some point in their training; from this, it requires no great leap of reasoning to reconsider the role of the physician in addressing pain and suffering. Should unwilling patients be allowed to forgo life-sustaining therapy? Most systems of law concede this right. But this raises a more difficult question: Should physicians assist certain patients—perhaps those who meet some predefined criteria for measuring distress—in ending their own lives? Within the medical profession and among ethicists there are strong opinions, but there is no widely agreed-upon answer.

Perhaps mirroring or perhaps causing this conflicted thinking, lawmakers in our country are similarly divided. In 1997, the US Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution neither explicitly permits nor prohibits physician-assisted suicide. Since then, the states have been free to consider on their own the question of legalizing the practice of assisted suicide. Measures to legalize physician-assisted suicide have been proposed and defeated in eight state legislatures—bringing the number of states outlawing its practice to 38. Oregon, which held a popular referendum on this issue in 1994, became the only state to legalize assisted suicide by implementing its Death With Dignity Act in 1997.2

In this issue of MSJAMA Juan Carlos Batlle clarifies terminology in recounting the legal and historical differences among assisted suicide, euthanasia, and the withdrawal of life support. Joanne Lynn and Karl Lorenz examine some of the ethical problems that physicians might face in responding to a patient's request for assisted suicide and draw attention to the failure of the US health care system to provide reliable supportive and palliative care for the dying. Larry Palmer sizes up the legal struggle between the US attorney general and the state of Oregon over that state's assisted suicide law. All of these authors challenge us to think about this issue, which yields no easy answers.

References
Zussman R. Intensive Care: Medical Ethics and the Medical Profession. Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press; 1994.
Foley K, Hendin H. Conclusion: changing the culture. In: Foley K, Hendin H, eds. The Case gainst Physician-Assisted Suicide: For a Right to End-of-Life Care. Baltimore, Md: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2002.

Figures

Tables

References

Zussman R. Intensive Care: Medical Ethics and the Medical Profession. Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press; 1994.
Foley K, Hendin H. Conclusion: changing the culture. In: Foley K, Hendin H, eds. The Case gainst Physician-Assisted Suicide: For a Right to End-of-Life Care. Baltimore, Md: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2002.
CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

747 Views
1 Citations
×

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Jobs