0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
msJAMA |

Seeing the Fetus: The Role of Technology and Image in the Maternal-Fetal Relationship FREE

Nathan Stormer, PhD
JAMA. 2003;289(13):1700. doi:10.1001/jama.289.13.1700.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

SEEING THE FETUS: THE ROLE OF TECHNOLOGY AND IMAGE IN THE MATERNAL-FETAL RELATIONSHIP

It is only in the last 30 years that it has been possible to visualize the living fetus. Before then, its life was often acknowledged at "quickening," when the pregnant woman first noticed it moving within the uterus. With the new ability to see the fetus as an independent organism, however, both medical science and society now envision the maternal-fetal relationship as beginning at a much earlier stage in fetal development. Visual imagery, specifically sonography, has become an important representation of that relationship. Consider a recent television commercial featuring high-resolution 3-dimensional sonographic images of a third-trimester fetus or a Time cover story describing Alexander Tsiaras' beautifully detailed, computer-enhanced images of fetal development as "at the forefront of a biomedical revolution."1 These contemporary biomedical images of the fetus are changing public perception of the unborn and may shift the balance of legal rights from the maternal to the fetal body.

Due in part to laws restricting human anatomical dissection, accurate depictions of the fetus did not appear until 1799, when Samuel Thomas Soemmerring published plates of staged embryonic development.2 And it was not until 1965, when Lennart Nilsson's photograph of an 18-week fetus appeared on the cover of Life, that the image of a fetus became widely recognized.

The photographic quality of modern sonography, given its role in fetal measurement and diagnostics, carries with it a connotation of objectivity that may deflect attention from the cultural assumptions that give these images such authority. Fasouliotis and Schenker write, "The biological maternal fetal relationship has not changed but the medical model of that relationship has shifted emphasis from unity to duality. Physicians no longer look to the maternal host for diagnostic data and a therapeutic medium; they look through her to the fetal organism and regard it as a distinct patient in its own right."3

Casper agrees that as fetal imaging technology advances, so does the likelihood of seeing the fetus as an entity separate from its maternal host.4 Mirroring the improved resolution of the fetal image has been the growth of "fetus as patient" advocates who explicitly argue for equal and competing interests of the fetus.5 When the fetus is increasingly visualized as a person, resolving ethical tensions between the welfare of the mother and fetus becomes a contest between their rights and obligations.3 Pateman has argued that the assumption of the impregnable male body was implicit in the work of Locke and Rousseau, which continues to influence current debate.6 Liberal political theories have generally not accorded the pregnant body any unique individual rights. Against this ambiguous political context, biomedical images of the fetus gain meaning.

The fetal image in popular culture is frequently depicted without reference to the pregnant woman's body.7 Nilsson's photographs and Tsiaris' computer models depict the suspended, solitary, floating fetal individual without the maternal placenta, the gravid uterus, or the maternal vascular system that nourishes the fetus. In standard representations of pregnancy such as medical texts or the film The Miracle of Life, women's bodies are represented as oceanic environs: fertile media in which life grows.8,9 Duden has argued that "the public image of the fetus shapes the emotional and the bodily perception of the pregnant woman."2 The mother and fetus are represented not as equal individuals, but rather as a biological matrix and its product. While modern in medium, these images echo ancient depictions of the pregnant body. In Aristotle's biology, for instance, women were considered only as hosts to men's seed.10

The visual technologies of the latter 20th century have reconfigured and amplified the ancient concept of woman as a principally generative space. In her discussion of fetal surgery, Casper agrees that the fetus has become a conceptual entity independent from the mother.4 Whether or not the sonogram in its focus on the fetus in effect "erase[s] women,"4 there is a growing consensus that visual imagery of the fetus is changing the medical and cultural status of the maternal-fetal relationship.

References
Nash JM. Inside the womb.  Time.[serial online]. Available at: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1101021111-386944,00.html. Accessed November 16, 2002.
Duden B. Disembodying WomenHoinacki L, trans. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 1993.
Fasouliotis SJ, Schenker JG. Maternal-fetal conflict.  Eur J Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Biol.2000;89:101-107.
Casper MJ. The Making of the Unborn Patient: A Social Anatomy of Fetal SurgeryNew Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press; 1998.
Chervenak FA, McCullough LB. The fetus as a patient: an essential ethical concept for maternal-fetal medicine.  J Matern Fetal Med.1996;5:115-119.
Pateman C. The Sexual ContractStanford, Calif: Stanford University Press; 1988.
Petchesky RP. Fetal images: the power of the visual culture in the politics of reproduction.  Feminist Studies.1987;13:263-292.
Stormer N. Embodying normal miracles.  Q J Speech.1997;83:172-179.
Martin E. The Woman in the Body: A Cultural Analysis of ReproductionBoston, Mass: Beacon Press; 1987.
Lloyd GER. Science, Folklore, and Ideology: Studies in the Life Sciences in Ancient GreeceCambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 1983.

Figures

Tables

References

Nash JM. Inside the womb.  Time.[serial online]. Available at: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1101021111-386944,00.html. Accessed November 16, 2002.
Duden B. Disembodying WomenHoinacki L, trans. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 1993.
Fasouliotis SJ, Schenker JG. Maternal-fetal conflict.  Eur J Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Biol.2000;89:101-107.
Casper MJ. The Making of the Unborn Patient: A Social Anatomy of Fetal SurgeryNew Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press; 1998.
Chervenak FA, McCullough LB. The fetus as a patient: an essential ethical concept for maternal-fetal medicine.  J Matern Fetal Med.1996;5:115-119.
Pateman C. The Sexual ContractStanford, Calif: Stanford University Press; 1988.
Petchesky RP. Fetal images: the power of the visual culture in the politics of reproduction.  Feminist Studies.1987;13:263-292.
Stormer N. Embodying normal miracles.  Q J Speech.1997;83:172-179.
Martin E. The Woman in the Body: A Cultural Analysis of ReproductionBoston, Mass: Beacon Press; 1987.
Lloyd GER. Science, Folklore, and Ideology: Studies in the Life Sciences in Ancient GreeceCambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 1983.

Letters

CME
Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Web of Science® Times Cited: 7

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.