0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
msJAMA |

Do the Math FREE

Teri A. Reynolds, PhD
JAMA. 2003;289(9):1162. doi:10.1001/jama.289.9.1162-a.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

My 59-year-old mother is learning about trinomials and the subjunctive. When she is not working, she goes to algebra class, to French, to programming. As long as she can carry a halftime load at the local college, she is not one of the 41.2 million uninsured in the United States. Because her job does not offer benefits, she has no employer-based care. Because a doctor once wrote in a chart that she might have emphysema (which she apparently does not), she has been refused coverage from the major private carriers. Because she is not disabled or blind, and I am no longer a minor, she is not eligible for Medicaid. Because neither of us could afford the $796 per month "safety-net" coverage she was offered in her state, we pay tuition at the local college, and she sits up late at night doing homework.

Neither her situation nor our absurd solution is typical, and neither is anyone else's. There are many ways to end up uninsured in this country, and just as many ways to be insured. But something is not working. As a nation, we spend more (whether measured in absolute terms, as percentage of gross national product, or per capita),1 and we cover less. The numbers are overwhelming: 15% of the US population is uninsured, and millions more are underinsured.2,3 Lack of insurance is associated with more illness and earlier death.3

There are myriad possible solutions. California alone, in last year's Health Care Options Project, generated 9 proposals aimed at universal coverage. They provide a microcosm of current health policy: 5 involve expanding eligibility for current programs; 2 propose employer-based coverage plans, and 2 are publicly funded "single-payer" plans.4 Which, if any, will be politically plausible remains to be seen.

Because the formulation is shocking and because it is true, people like to say we are the only industrialized nation in the world without a national health care system. (And yet we are not a country without a public health care system—Medicare and Medicaid together cover approximately 80 million people—over a quarter of the population.1) What is left to understand is why, and whether what we do instead is working.

In this issue, Bridget Harrison looks back to the five moments in the last century when we might have created a national system. Asaf Bitton and James Kahn review what we spend now, and where it goes. Jason Etheredge and Paul Uhlig ask how far incremental change to these existing programs can take us, while Joseph Harrell and Olveen Carrasquillo consider the particular combination of factors that leaves 1 in 3 US Latinos uninsured. That too many people are without coverage is clear. That this compromises health has been proven. That we can do better is certain.

References
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.  2002 Data Compendium. Available at: http://cms.hhs.gov/researchers/pubs/datacompendium/2002/02pg14.pdf. Accessed February 6, 2003.
Short P, Blanthin J. New estimates of the underinsured younger than 65 years.  JAMA.1995;274:1302-1306.
Committee on the Consequences of Uninsurance.  Care Without Coverage: Too Little, Too Late. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2002.
Lewin Group.  Cost and Coverage Analysis of Nine Proposals to Expand Health Insurance Coverage in CaliforniaFalls Church, Va: Lewin Group; 2002.

Figures

Tables

References

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.  2002 Data Compendium. Available at: http://cms.hhs.gov/researchers/pubs/datacompendium/2002/02pg14.pdf. Accessed February 6, 2003.
Short P, Blanthin J. New estimates of the underinsured younger than 65 years.  JAMA.1995;274:1302-1306.
Committee on the Consequences of Uninsurance.  Care Without Coverage: Too Little, Too Late. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2002.
Lewin Group.  Cost and Coverage Analysis of Nine Proposals to Expand Health Insurance Coverage in CaliforniaFalls Church, Va: Lewin Group; 2002.
CME
Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.