The term "patient-physician communication" encompasses a wide range
of interactions. These range from physicians' conversational style to formal
techniques for coping with patients' concerns. It has become clear that the
quality and content of patient-physician interaction has important effects
on both participants. For example, good communication with patients can be
associated with improved treatment adherence,1 and
physician communication styles appear to be associated with the risk of malpractice
litigation.2 Although the actions that constitute
good communication with patients are still vaguely defined in the literature,
there has been a great deal of recent interest in refining methods to promote
better communication between physicians and patients. This issue of MSJAMA approaches patient-physician communication from
several different perspectives, reflecting both the breadth of the field and
its relevance to clinical practice.
Gregory Makoul summarizes recent developments in attempts to measure
medical students' communication skills in an objective way. The proposal to
include a clinical skills assessment as part of the United States Medical
Licensing Examination (USMLE) is the first nationwide attempt to standardize
and assess the clinical communication skills expected of medical graduates.
The remaining articles discuss communication aspects in medical practice.
Kiran and Pavi Kundhal address the growing need for physicians to understand
how culture affects patients' experience of illness. Two other articles address
specific clinical situations that, while common in medical practice, are frequently
difficult for clinicians to address effectively. Rebecca Gordon-Lubitz discusses
issues regarding the communication of risk and risk assessment to patients.
Statistical analyses and risk stratification for various treatment options
is complicated information and can confuse patients trying to make decisions
in the setting of illness and uncertainty. Gordon-Lubitz addresses some of
these difficulties and outlines strategies that can be used to improve understanding.
Similarly, Michael Hahn addresses ways in which physicians communicate with
patients about advance directives. He notes some specific problems with advance
directives as they are currently employed and describes approaches that may
increase the use and efficacy of advanced directives.
The goal of research in patient-physician communication is to find approaches
to help physicians interact with patients in ways that will be beneficial
for both parties, and these articles represent only a small sample of this
growing field. The best methods for promoting good communication with patients
are still being refined. The question of how to teach physicians to use these
approaches successfully is similarly unclear. However, the need for clear
and effective interactions with patients makes patient-physician communication
an issue of considerable clinical importance.
Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and
Association With Material Stature
Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early
dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal
Thank you for submitting a comment on this article. It will be reviewed by JAMA editors. You will be notified when your comment has been published. Comments should not exceed 500 words of text and 10 references.
Do not submit personal medical questions or information that could identify a specific patient, questions about a particular case, or general inquiries to an author. Only content that has not been published, posted, or submitted elsewhere should be submitted. By submitting this Comment, you and any coauthors transfer copyright to the journal if your Comment is posted.
* = Required Field
Disclosure of Any Conflicts of Interest*
Indicate all relevant conflicts of interest of each author below, including all relevant financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including, but not limited to, employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speakers’ bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued. If all authors have none, check "No potential conflicts or relevant financial interests" in the box below. Please also indicate any funding received in support of this work. The information will be posted with your response.
Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more
Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features
Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)
Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours
Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.
Download citation file:
Web of Science® Times Cited: 6
Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.
and access these and other features:
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a link to reset your password.
Enter your username and email address. We'll send instructions on how to reset your password to the email address we have on record.
Athens and Shibboleth are access management services that provide single sign-on to protected resources. They replace the multiple user names and passwords necessary to access subscription-based content with a single user name and password that can be entered once per session. It operates independently of a user's location or IP address. If your institution uses Athens or Shibboleth authentication, please contact your site administrator to receive your user name and password.