Arndt KA. Information excess in medicine: overview, relevance to dermatology,
and strategies for coping. Arch Dermatol.1992;128:1249-1256.
MacLehose R, Reeves B, Harvey I, Sheldon T, Russell I, Black A. A systematic review of comparisons of effect sizes derived from randomised
and non-randomised studies. Health Technol Assess.2000;4:1-154.
Barnes D, Bero L. Scientific quality of original research articles on environmental tobacco
smoke. Tob Control.1997;6:19-26.
Barnes DE, Bero LA. Why review articles on the health effects of passive smoking reach
different conclusions. JAMA.1998;279:1566-1570.
Cho M, Bero L. Instruments for assessing the quality of drug studies published in
the medical literature. JAMA.1994;272:101-104.
Cho M, Bero L. The quality of drug studies published in symposium proceedings. JAMA.1994;272:101-104.
de Jong J, Schaper W. The international rank order of clinical cardiology. Eur Heart J.1996;17:35-42.
Seglen P. The skewness of science. J Am Soc Inform Sci.1992;43:628-638.
Bloom B, Retbi A, Dahan S, Jonsson E. Evaluation of randomized controlled trials on complementary and alternative
medicine. Int J Technol Assess Health Care.2000;16:13-21.
Birken CS, Parkin PC. In which journals will pediatricians find the best evidence for clinical
Rennie D. The present state of medical journals. Lancet.1998;SII:18-22.
Opthof T. Sense and nonsense about the impact factor. Cardiovasc Res.1997;33:1-7.
Schoonbaert D, Roelants G. Citation analysis for measuring the value of scientific publications:
quality assessment tool or comedy of errors? Trop Med Int Health.1996;1:739-752.
Bruer JT. Methodological rigor and citation frequency in patient compliance literature. Am J Public Health.1982;72:1119-1123.
Gehanno J, Thirion B. How to select publications on occupational health: the usefulness of
medline and the impact factor. Occup Environ Med.2000;57:706-709.
Pittler M, Abbot N, Harkness E, Ernst E. Location bias in controlled clinical trials of complementary/alternative
therapies. J Clin Epidemiol.2000;53:485-489.
Joyce J, Rabe-Hesketh S, Wessely S. Reviewing the reviews: the example of chronic fatique syndrome. JAMA.1998;280:264-266.
Gallagher EJ, Barnaby DP. Evidence of methodologic bias in the derivation of the Science Citation
Index impact factor. Ann Emerg Med.1998;31:83-86.
Seglen P. Citations and journal impact factors: questionable indicators of research
Seglen PO. Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating
Moed H, Van Leeuwen T, Reeduck J. A critical analysis of the journal impact factors of Angewandte Chemie and The Journal of the American
Chemical Society: inaccuracies in published impact factors based on
overall citations only. Scientometrics.1996;37:105-116.
Larsson K. The dissemination of false data through inadequate citation. J Intern Med.1995;238:445-450.
Seglen P. Causal relationship between article citedness and journal impact. J Am Soc Inform Sci.1994;45:1-11.
Evans JT, Nadjari HI, Burchell SA. Quotational and reference accuracy in surgical journals: a continuing
peer review problem. JAMA.1990;263:1353-1354.
Campbell F. National bias: a comparison of citation practices by health professionals. Bull Med Libr Assoc.1990;78:376-382.
MacRoberts M, MacRoberts B. Problems of citation analysis: a critical review. J Am Soc Inform Sci.1989;40:342-349.
Gotzsche PC. Reference bias in reports of drug trials. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed).1987;295:654-656.
Moravcsik M, Murugesan P. Some results on the function and quality of citations. Soc Stud Sci.1975;5:86-92.
Djulbegovic B, Lacevic M, Cantor A.
et al. The uncertainty principle and industry-sponsored research. Lancet.2000;356:635-638.
Bero L, Rennie D. Influences on the quality of published drug studies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care.1996;12:209-237.
Davidson R. Source of funding and outcome of clinical trials. J Gen Intern Med.1986;1:155-158.
Institute for Scientific Information. Science Citation Index: Journal Citation Reports. Philadelphia, Pa: Institute for Scientific Information; 1998.
Not Available. Ulrich's International Periodicals Directory. 38th ed. New Providence, NJ: Bowker; 2000.
Hill D. Brandon/Hill selected list of books and journals for the small medical
library. Bull Med Libr Assoc.1999;87:145-169.
Moher D, Jadad A, Nichol G, Penman M, Tugwell P, Walsh S. Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: an annotated
bibliography of scales and checklists. Control Clin Trials.1995;16:62-73.
Juni P, Witschi A, Bloch R, Egger M. The hazards of scoring the quality of clinical trials for meta-analysis. JAMA.1999;282:1054-1060.
Lijmer JG, Mol BW, Heisterkamp S.
et al. Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic
Berlin J, Rennie D. Measuring the quality of trials: the quality of quality scales. JAMA.1999;282:1083-1085.
Clark H, Wells G, Huet C.
et al. Assessing the quality of randomized trials: reliability of the Jadad
scale. Control Clin Trials.1999;20:448-452.
Berlin J, Miles C, Crigliano M.
et al. Does blinding of readers affect the results of meta-analyses? results
of a randomized trial. Online J Curr Clin Trials.2001. Available at: http://gort.ucsd.edu/newjour/o/msg01600.html.
Haggard E. Intraclass Correlation and the Analysis of Variance. New York, NY: Dryden Press; 1958.
Davidoff F, DeAngelis CD, Drazen JM.
et al. Sponsorship, authorship, and accountability. JAMA.2001;286:1232-1234.
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. Ann Intern Med.1997;126:36-47.